In our previous artcile on Wikileaks and UFOs, we reported that Wikileaks upcoming UFO disclosure documents, may contain Cosmic Top Secret files.read more
What story? I could say my butt might contain UFOs. How about making a headline when you have a story or some of the Wikileaks info. This headline only has one ancient example of unsubstantiated hearsay, from 40 years ago! This is why I usually don't even look at these stories anymore. After 50 years you might expect some evidence by now, or at least I expect some evidence. Unless this is a UFO religion, like Scientology, then only good stories are needed.
Faithless Templar and The 1 are US government sponsored computer-disinfo agents who relentlessly stalk Scrivener. They are illiterate computer-perps, which is why they cannot come up with a whole article -- writing coherent paragraphs is beyond them. Any articles or sites they recommend contain disinformation. So I highly recommend that you read the articles that they recommend to find out what not to believe. In that way, they perform a service, just not the one they intend.
Ken70 (not verified)
at 13:09 on December 21st, 2010
TI, what do you think about Wikibomb’s post about Wikileaks ufo reports?
Ken70 (not verified)
at 13:11 on December 21st, 2010
www.wikileaksforum.net/topic/and-the-wikibomb-is
Ken70 (not verified)
at 13:14 on December 21st, 2010
www.wikileaksforum.net/topic/and-the-wikibomb-is
Ken70 (not verified)
at 13:19 on December 21st, 2010
i cannot add the link!www.nowpublic.com/world/us-crawling-internet-ahead-upcoming-wikileaks-ufo-disclosure
Don't know this (TI) person who thinks it's his right to accuse other posters of being some sort of US government sponsored computer-disinfo agent. I'd say this person may have a few screws loose, and doesn't actually know anyone who is a 'computer-disinfo agent'.
1
Ken70 (not verified)
at 13:26 on December 21st, 2010
I cannot enter the url here! Try to search in google for WIKIBOMB WIKILEAKSFORUM dot NET
MOCAM1 (not verified)
at 17:13 on December 19th, 2010
Look for anyone to state that something does not exist simply for a lack of evidence is what we as americans have been conditioned to. Personally we should not discredit anything unless we can prove it otherwise.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (12)
at 16:31 on December 16th, 2010
What story? I could say my butt might contain UFOs. How about making a headline when you have a story or some of the Wikileaks info. This headline only has one ancient example of unsubstantiated hearsay, from 40 years ago! This is why I usually don't even look at these stories anymore. After 50 years you might expect some evidence by now, or at least I expect some evidence. Unless this is a UFO religion, like Scientology, then only good stories are needed.
at 23:19 on December 16th, 2010
@ aligatorhardt - Anyways who asked you to comment here, if you don't even like to look at UFO stories with evidence? Or you just a Debunker ...
at 00:26 on December 17th, 2010
I dont think anybody has to be 'asked' to comment here. Its a public site.
Besides he made a fair point, your stories are totally shit as a rule.
at 04:49 on December 17th, 2010
Thxs 4 that UFO Blogger !
These two below articles were the ones that got me thinking. To many reports to think this is a hoax anymore.
http://www.subversiveelement.com/dulceschneider.html
http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2010/08/ufo-are-real-ben-rich-lockheed-skunk.html
at 06:13 on December 17th, 2010
Faithless Templar and The 1 are US government sponsored computer-disinfo agents who relentlessly stalk Scrivener. They are illiterate computer-perps, which is why they cannot come up with a whole article -- writing coherent paragraphs is beyond them. Any articles or sites they recommend contain disinformation. So I highly recommend that you read the articles that they recommend to find out what not to believe. In that way, they perform a service, just not the one they intend.
at 13:09 on December 21st, 2010
TI, what do you think about Wikibomb’s post about Wikileaks ufo reports?
at 13:11 on December 21st, 2010
www.wikileaksforum.net/topic/and-the-wikibomb-is
at 13:14 on December 21st, 2010
www.wikileaksforum.net/topic/and-the-wikibomb-is
at 13:19 on December 21st, 2010
i cannot add the link!www.nowpublic.com/world/us-crawling-internet-ahead-upcoming-wikileaks-ufo-disclosure
at 19:44 on December 17th, 2010
Don't know this (TI) person who thinks it's his right to accuse other posters of being some sort of US government sponsored computer-disinfo agent. I'd say this person may have a few screws loose, and doesn't actually know anyone who is a 'computer-disinfo agent'.
1
at 13:26 on December 21st, 2010
I cannot enter the url here! Try to search in google for WIKIBOMB WIKILEAKSFORUM dot NET
at 17:13 on December 19th, 2010
Look for anyone to state that something does not exist simply for a lack of evidence is what we as americans have been conditioned to. Personally we should not discredit anything unless we can prove it otherwise.