US has given "amber light" to Israeli plan for strike on Iran

by korzac | July 12, 2008 at 09:48 pm
214 views | 10 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

US has given "amber light" to Israeli plan for strike on Iran

US has given "amber light" to Israeli plan for strike on Iran

see larger image

uploaded by korzac

Saber-rattling is intensifying, but here in Israel "things are as usual"..I drink my first morning cafe.

President George W Bush has told the Israeli government that he may be prepared to approve a future military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations with Tehran break down, according to a senior Pentagon official.

Despite the opposition of his own generals and widespread scepticism that America is ready to risk the military, political and economic consequences of an airborne strike on Iran, the president has given an “amber light” to an Israeli plan to attack Iran’s main nuclear sites with long-range bombing sorties, the official told The Sunday Times.

“Amber means get on with your preparations, stand by for immediate attack and tell us when you’re ready,” the official said. But the Israelis have also been told that they can expect no help from American forces and will not be able to use US military bases in Iraq for logistical support.

Nor is it certain that Bush’s amber light would ever turn to green without irrefutable evidence of lethal Iranian hostility. Tehran’s test launches of medium-range ballistic missiles last week were seen in Washington as provocative and poorly judged, but both the Pentagon and the CIA concluded that they did not represent an immediate threat of attack against Israeli or US targets.

The full article is here.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Jordan Yerman
Jordan Yerman
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:06 on July 13th, 2008

korzac, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
korzac

Jordan, thanks fo the GS.

0
scout29c

While searching for posts on the recent Iranian missile launch, I came across yours.  I recently posted on the subject myself and was wondering what others thought.

<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 

What’s going on in the Middle East is not about <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Israel, the U.S. occupation of Iraq, or even Europe or Russia.  It’s about an age-old war that has been going long before there was an Israel or even the U.S.  Europe was in the midst of the Dark Ages, and the land that is Russia was ruled by Mongols when this Mid-East struggle began.

 

It would have surfaced sooner if not for the Israel situation that arose in the middle of the previous century.  The insurgency that Saddam feared more than some possible U.S. takeover was always bubbling just below the surface.  The U.S. overthrow of Saddam has caused a rebalancing of age-old rivalries in the Middle East that will affect us all.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from