USDA's Cheryl Cook Asked Shirley Sherrod To Pull Over And Resign

by NowPublic Staff | July 20, 2010 at 10:38 am
10027 views | 16 Recommendations | 32 comments

Videos

Shirley Sherrod Defended by White farmers Wife; Eloise & Rodger Spooner

see larger video

sourced by NowPublic Staff

Shirley Sherrod Defended by White farmers Wife; Eloise & Rodger Spooner

Shirley Sherrod Forced To Resign By USDA Deputy Under Secretary Cheryl Cook - "Asked To Pull Over And Quit", Sherrod Alleges

Update: Tom Vilsack, Agricultural Secretary - Sticks By Decision To Fire Shirley Sherrod

"I didn't speak to the White House...nobody from the White House contacted me about this decision at all."

Earlier Sherrod Story

The handling or mis-handling of the Shirley Sherrod resignation is clear sign that the White House and the Obama administration are completely spooked by the right wing blog-o-sphere and their head bingo caller, Glenn Beck. 

Sherrod a former federal employee has been accused of discriminating against a white farmer back in 1986 - an accusation that surfaced on the the web after a 2009 speech to the NAACP by Sherrod

They asked me to resign, and, in fact, they harassed me as I was driving back to the state office from West Point, Georgia yesterday," Sherrod told CNN. "I had at least three calls telling me the White House wanted me to resign…and the last one asked me to pull over to the side of the road and do it."

Sherrod said the final call came from Cheryl Cook, an undersecretary at the Department of Agriculture. Sherrod said White House officials wanted her to quit immediately because the controversy was "going to be on Glenn Beck tonight."

Here is what prompted the resignation of Sherrod, up until now, an obscure federal employee for the Department of Agriculture.

A 2 mintue snippte of 40 mintue 2009 speech Sherrod gave to the NAACP was posted online by the right wing journalist, Andrew Breibart.

In the snippet Sherrod discuss her thoughts about helping a white farmer who came to the USDA for assistance. Shirley Sherrod said,

What he didn't know while he was taking all that time trying to show me he was superior to me was, I was trying to decide just how much help I was going to give him. I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farm land, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. 

So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough, so that when he... I assumed the Department of Agriculture had sent him to me, either that or the Georgia Department of Agriculture, and he needed to go back and report that I did try to help him."

As soon as the clip became public and began circulating in the media the the NAACP condemned Sherrod, and the right-wing meida was chomping eager to devour Ms. Sherrod. 

However before Glenn Beck could launch his vitriol the White House acted, launching a pre-emptive take out of Shirley Sherrod.

Ms. Sherrod says the 2 mintue snippet is not reflective of her 40 minute speech. Sherrod told CNN her entire speech was trying to illustrate that we must all overcome our deep seated prejudices and Sherrod said she used her own personal anecdote with the farmer to illustrate how we can fall to discrimination. 

And I went on to work with many more white farmers," she said. "The story helped me realize that race is not the issue, it's about the people who have and the people who don't. When I speak to groups, I try to speak about getting beyond the issue of race.


Now the NAACP is back tracking. It says it has launched an investigation hoping to interview the farmer in question, watching the full video of the Sherrod speech, and actually speaking with Shirley Sharrod herself.

Eloise Spooner the wive of the Farmer in question talked to CNN from the couple's home in Albany, Georgia.

It took Mrs. Spooner, a humble farmer's wife to set the record straight. 

"They have not treated her right....she helped save our farm," she told CNN while Shirley Sharrod was appearing as a guest. 

It was clear from the exchange on CNN that Eloise Spooner and Shirley Sharrod had both respect and affection for each other.

Further, at the time of alleged discrimination in 1986 Shirley Sherrod was working for a non-profit and was not a Federal employee.

The fact that her boss Deputy Undersecretary Cheryl Cook asked her to resign, and apparently, asked her to pull off the highway and submit her resignation by phone, on the side of the road is an indication of how sensitive the Obama administration is to attacks from the Right.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
5
Bill Andersoot

How is this an indication of how sensitive the Obama administration is to attacks from the right? So far, all I've heard is an exchange between Cheryl Cook and Shirley Sherrod. Is Cheryl Cook (a Tom Vilsak hire) now, suddenly, a spokesperson for the entire Obama administration?

2
NowPublic Staff

Simply put, the White House must have surely been informed and knew about the USDA action - within hours of the story surfacing her resignation was asked for and received - the USDA is not exactly a swift moving institution and one suspects that they would not have moved on this without administration approval

3
gloria   davis

I pray the USDA official who fired her at least saw the entire video, if not I agree with the first poster, the White house is spooked and  acted too soon to treat an employee this way. I have read what she said in it's entirety and and I don't like how she  responded to this man 24 years ago, But, I understand.....  the racial climate at that time was totally differrent, especially regarding women in  positions of authority. She was being just a little too honest ( outloud)  concerning her feelings regarding black farmers not receiving help and now  being faced with being black and having to help a white farmer as she watched her own race not receiving the same  help. These were clearly thought processes she  was relaying to the audience/ feelings from a past era , she even said so, these are not the things she did or how she feels now. She helped the family. Doing enough is all that is required, she is not required to go above and beyond, but you know I think she really did go beyond and above because  the family loves her to this day... 24 years later.   I don't personally know her, but I saw her character and I think she is an honorable woman and she should hold her head up high.   SHAME ON YOU USDA FOR USING PEOPLE AS PAWNS IN THE HEATED POLITICAL ARENA,   MS.SHRLEY DIDN'T DESERVE THIS.  

1
YankeeJim

Context doesn't really matter. It was a poor choice of an example, and it was discrimination on her part.

2
Alric_IV

Evidently you didn't see the whole video.  The point she was making was that she learned that racism was wrong, and she went on to help this farmer keep his farm.  That's not an example of discrimination.  It's an example of an epiphany. ______

1
YankeeJim

She put limits on the help. Her honesty is OK, but politically harmful. Everyone has bias in the history if they have done anything in their lives. Yes, we all learn from it. But, when you go political, it all hangs out.

4
Karen Hatter

The assertion that Ms. Sherrod put limits on her aid to the White couple is incorrect, Jim. Further in the same video, Ms. Sherrod reveals her efforts to replace the first attorney she acquired for the couple because she felt nothing was getting done to help them. 

The full video reveals her attempt to give a life lesson against discriminating, saying she realized helping poor people was the goal she should strive for in her position, 24 years ago, not concerning herself with the color of the man's skin.

As Gloria Davis (not verified) pointed out above, context is everything.

Ms. Sherrod's story is one of overcoming her own experiences as a southern Black woman in Georgia, her father having been killed by a Ku Klux Klansman, finding her humanity to aid a poor white farming couple in need, who testify to the aid they were given, calling her a friend.

It seems self described TEA Party activist Andrew Breitbart spent hours combing through NAACP tape, trying to find some red meat to wave in front of those among the Right Wing desirous of proof of the alleged racist elements within the NAACP rather than addressing the racist elements found within the TEA Party.

Mr. Breitbart's efforts were duly rewarded.

A link to the entire speech delivered by Ms. Sherrod.

1
un

Where do you live, on Mars?

2
Roderick Brown

Yes you're right.  My grandfather, is one of the black farmers that should have been paid from the lawsuit they won before I was born.  He still hasn't seen a dime.  Nothing is done quickly by the USDA.   With exception to this.    

1
YankeeJim

Roderick, that is an excellent point. Government moves too slowly in matters that are essential to people and their short lives.

6
Jack Johnson

Cheryl Cook was a cutthroat territorial individual when she worked in the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.  It is no surprise that she is involved in corruption at the federal level.  

7
Anjoh

Sounds to me like Cheryl Cook lied!  She knew if she said the White House, Ms. Sherrod would comply as would most people who work for the government.  Ms Cook needs to be called on the carpet because she had no authority to speak for the administration.Cook and her boss are the two people who should be fired.

1
YankeeJim

Good point. We'll see all of the facts on the table.

4
Roderick Brown

There is much fault to be handed out here, and from what I've seen none of it should be placed on Mrs. Sherrod.  The Age of Journalism has ended and been replaced by gotcha tactics.   A woman that has done actual good for the place she calls home has been raked through the mud.  There was once a time when you'd hear the  words, "We're investigating the issue to learn all the facts," but not anymore.   People who don't take stock in words, are being allowed to determine which ones are important.  Racist - - is being tossed around as easy as the "He, She, and It."  Use to be you actually had to be confirmed hard, to be labeled as one.  Now anyone wanting to throw attention off themselves jump to calling anyone else it.  The NAACP, after having their point proven over the weekend needed someone to demonize on their side of the spectrum, and were too ready to do so the second an opportunity was presented.   Instead of doing what anyone in their position was supposed to do and investigate first then speak second, they chose to, jump on the bandwagon.  In so, they have lost my respect.  And that's hard to do seeing I'm an actual a former NAACP scholarship recipent and up to now supporter and defender.  The Obama administration is being pulled into this.  Their response on TV was they didn't have anything to do with this, but I have to believe Mrs. Sherrod when she said someone higher up used them as an influencing measure.  If they truly want to make this right, cause this is a hotbed that will only get even more out of hand, they need to speak themself to Mrs. Sherrod.  Let her confirm she has spoken to by them and that they have done everything in their effort to rectify this.  If not Shirley Sherrod will be reduced as a talking point tool by people like Glenn Beck as a prime example of Big Government over stepping bounds.  I just got word from a friend that he has already taken steps to defend her, which is the right thing to do.  Let's face it, from what he has said and done in the pass, it's not like he actually cares for her, but he'll be more than happy to use her. There are some that have done the right thing.  I thank CNN for actually doing what more should have.  True Journalism, lifting up the stones and looking under them.  Vilesack is only making things worse as he defends his decision.  Right now you're proving to the world you don't control what you're in charge of.  Someone else is pulling you're strings to do what they want, be it the Administration, Right extreme, or your own fears.  Everyone, Stop!!!  Take a breathe...  and think...

3
jw456

Tom Vilsack should reinstate her.  Here is his email address:AgSec@usda.gov

3
R Ellis

I have for sometime wondered why Mister Obama has not used the mandate which he was given last year to put a stop to all the problems this country is facing due to the republicans and Bush instead of forcing the republicans and his own party to pony up and help this country when he had the power he has tried to play the so called bipartisan game which any fool knew would not work with the republicans. Now that he has lost the power he once commanded and will likely lose the majority in either the house or the senate or both we see that the white house has also lost the guts to stand up for a decent hard working and courageous woman like Mrs. Sherrod only to cower like some frightened child before the lying individuals on the right. After seeing this last folly the white house has been involved in I can say for certain that Mr. Obama and the democratic party will never receive another vote of mine we need a leader who is not afraid to use the big stick when needed and stand up for what is right in this country and not wait until it is too late to do anything the Obama administration has become impotent and we need new blood in the white house to get the job done it seems he had plenty to say during the Gates matter but not one word for a decent human being like  Mrs. Sherrod.  Mrs. Sherrod I only wish you where sitting in the oval office.

1
dbski4it

Sherrod is a bigot, pure and simple. She should have her pension taken away.

2
skegee84

Apparently you did not view Mrs. Sherrod's speech in it's entirety.  I believe if you do you will reconsider your opinion of her.  If nothing else, she is due a full review of the omments she made.

2
Californiagirl

I do not see how anyone could view the entire speech and not see her message was one of peace, telling the kids of today racism in any form is wrong, and that she felt what she did  was wrong at first for not doing all she could for the white farmer just because of his skin color, and in the end she did help him, cause she knew in her heart that if she did not help him just because of his skin color that would make her a racisist.We all could learn from her. After everything she and her family went through, and to raise above it is something special, and we can all learn from her. We do have to work together to better our neighborhoods. I think she is great. I hope she takes her job back because we need people like Shirly in office to stand up for all the people.

6
Disgusted with Cheryl Cook

Cheryl Cook is a crook and corrupt.  I know.......She was a boss of mine.She pulled in favors for people and fired people for her friends. She does not practice what she preaches....I hated her.  I will never forgive her for ruining people's lives.

4
james goldberg

yankee jim is just looking to rattle a cage. he knows better. ignore this clown please.

1
james goldberg

everyone in government is corrupt to someone or another. all depends on who is getting the help and who isnt. that slavery thing was pretty corrupt to me.

1
james goldberg

everyone in government is corrupt at one point to someone. it all depends on who is getting helped. that slavery thing was kinda corrupt to me.

3
Lucy B

Well spoken, Gloria Davis!  What has come out of this cluster is what a bumbling bunch of idiots will do when the paranoia flag is raised. How dare all invoved  not investigate? How dare the NAACP make ANY statement without its guard up? Who the heck is Cheryl Cook that she can call someone, travelling, and bully them into a resignation?  And why did Ms. Sherrod take the bait?  She should have told Cook where to go. Wrong is wrong, 24/7/365.  Sherrod never should have resigned. She should have made Cook and Vilsack fire her, then try to sell that one to the public.  And whoever was involved at the White House needs to be fired too. At best they should all be assigned to a war zone. Let's see how proactive and aggressive they can be, attacking petty issues like these in Iraq or Afghanistan.

1
Cap'n Rusty

It's not a demonstration of how "sensitive" the Obama Administration is, it's a demonstration of how incompetent they are.

2
Karen Hatter
It's also important to understand that Andrew Breitbart's timing of the release of the grossly distorted video of Sherrod, which he admits having had for weeks, may not be entirely random. Congress will soon vote on whether to fund part of a settlement between the USDA and African-American farmers who faced acknowledged discrimination -- farmers like Sherrod and her husband used to be. It's a tiny piece of the upcoming war supplemental bill.

The USDA settlements with African-American farmers are a longtime bête noire of the right, which they deem a giveaway to a core Democratic constituency. It's not clear whether Brietbart's release of the video was specifically intended to hurt the chances of other African-America farmers to receive recompense from decades of discrimination that caused them to lose their farms, but conservatives immediately used the video to attack the settlement. The discrimination claims, known globally as the Pigford settlement, is the elephant in the room, so here's the background.

For years, and continuing through the 1990s, the USDA denied loans and grants to scores of farmers simply because they were African-American. Timothy Pigford finally sued the department in 1997; the suit became a class action with 400 additional plaintiffs and 2,000 farmers thought eligible; and the result was what's known as the Pigford settlement, decided in 1999.

The Pigford settlement offered two tracks: Track A offered $50,000 (plus loan forgiveness and tax offsets) to each eligible African-American farmer who had complained of discrimination since 1983, subject to applications and reviews; Track B offered the possibility of larger damages, provided plaintiffs could show a preponderance of evidence to arbitrators, prove their losses were greater than $50,000 and, of course, wait out the process. Less than 1 percent of the 22,721 class members chose to pursue Track B.

According to multiple sources that TPMmuckraker has not independently confirmed, Sherrod and her husband, Charles, were two of only 170 plaintiffs that chose Track B. Vilsack acknowledged in his press conference that Sherrod was a claimant in the Pigford settlement.

Earlier this year, Sherrod's story was featured as part of the Fort Valley State University's Middle Georgia Oral History Project. Her story describes her view of the incidents leading up to the end of her case before the Pigford v. Vilsack arbitrator.

Sherrod's story is the first in the collection. The self-described farm girl grew up with five sisters. In 1963, a white farmer murdered her father, but was never prosecuted. The shocking incident inspired Sherrod, a young college student at FVSU, to join the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. There, she met and married its leader Charles Sherrod.

The couple traveled overseas, studying at a kibbutz. In 1968, armed with knowledge, the SNCC members returned to Georgia to develop a community. They obtained a 6,000-acre land trust in Lee County, Ga., for New Communities, Inc., established with other black families. They received funding for its development, but then-Gov. Maddox called a halt to further expansion. Despite the roadblock, the group pushed forward and built train tracks, sugar cane mills, grew corn, peanuts, soy beans and also processed meats.

The organization thrived until 1970s when a drought damaged crops causing a major loss of revenues. The group applied for an emergency loan but was denied. "The National Conservancy could have paid the debt on the land, but every time we wanted to do something, the doors closed because we were black," Sherrod said. In 1985, the bank foreclosed on the property.

"They wanted to wipe all traces of us off the land," Sherrod said. "They dug holes, took a bulldozer and destroyed all of our buildings."

Nearly a decade later, the Sherrods filed a lawsuit. After legal wrangling and several incompetent lawyers, the case was brought before a judge who awarded the couple and New Communities, Inc., almost $13 million ($8 million for the land, $4 million in lost income and $1 million in personal damages) in 2009.

Sherrod's story is similar to those of many of the farmers who were denied loans commonly granted to white farmers, which was the reason for the initial Pigford suit and the initial settlement by the government.

But thousands of farmers missed the original Pigford deadline, due to shoddy work by their own lawyers and inadequate promotion, among other reasons. In response to a decades-long movement to re-open the Pigford class, Congress passed another $100 million in the 2008 farm bill to help settle new claims; earlier this year, the Obama administration announced an additional grant -- called Pigford II -- of $1.25 billion.

But the money hasn't been doled out, because Congress hasn't given the okay yet. It missed a March 31 deadline. Then a May 31 deadline. Currently, the money for the new Pigford settlement resides in the war supplemental -- which Majority Leader Harry Reid announced last Friday would be up for a vote some time this week.

2
Junie B

Ms. Hatter,

Thank you so much for this wealth of information regarding Ms. Sherrod and the background surrounding her speech. This helps to clarify even more, what is behind much of the activities surrounding this story. I certainly wish Ms. Sherrod the best from this most unfortunate situation.

Well done.

1
Karen Hatter

You're welcome and my sincere thanks, Junie B.

2
jaid elkins

I think the Cheryl Cooke aspect is not as scrutinized as it should be.  What role did she actually play in this debacle; whose permission did she have to request and secure a resignation; were her efforts on behalf of preserving the integrity of the agency or was she attempting to rid the department of someone she saw as hostile.  Only a true journalist would investigate this aspect and draw up a timeline to determine perhaps one of the most overlook players in this story.  Follow the Cooke story line and you may find a uninvestigated aspect

2
Dora Knell

Shirley Sherrod thinks someone in the White House told Cheryl Cook to see that she resign immediately.  Sherrod was a White House appointee, so it seems Cook or Kilseck would have checked with the White House about how to handle the matter.  Kilseck says he had full responsibility. He may have been told to handle it anyway he wanted.  It is possible, as someone else has said, the fact Sherrod is a claimant in the Black farmers' suit may be a thorn in the side of Kilseck. Cook has a reputation of being tough, so she was given the job to contact Sherrod.  The perfect hatchet-man for any company! Er, hatchet woman? The biggest problem is  bloggers can run doctored video's and set everyone aflame without regard to the truth. I hope Sherrod sues  Breitbatt for defamation of her character. Something has to be done to correct such blog games, or there will be new rules made for everyone on the internet. Good journalism appears to be dead! San Rafael, California  

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Jordan Yerman
First Flagged at 10:39 AM, Jul 20, 2010 by Jordan Yerman
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (16)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from