NP Rank:
VA Gov. McDonnell Angers Civil Rights Advocates with Declaration
Virginia Governor Robert F Mc Donnell has angered civil rights leaders with his revival of Confederate History Month
Conflict follows on Gay workers' protection controversy
GOP Gov. Robert F. McDonnell of Virginia has declared that April will be Confederate History Month in his state. By doing so, he has revived an eight year old conflict and angered civil rights leaders.
Honoring those who fought for the South in the Civil War, the month proclamation is said to be mainly symbolic. Two previous Democratic governors had refused in their terms to acknowledge the month.
Reviving a Tradition of Controversy
McDonnell has revived a tradition begun by Republican Governor George Allen in 1997. McDonnell, though, has gone a step further than his predecessor, leaving out anti-slavery language that Allen's successor, James S. Gilmore III (R), had asked be included in his proclamation.
McDonnell said Tuesday that the move was designed to promote tourism in the state, which next year will mark the 150th anniversary of the start of the war. McDonnell said he did not include a reference to slavery because "there were any number of aspects to that conflict between the states. Obviously, it involved slavery. It involved other issues. But I focused on the ones I thought were most significant for Virginia."
Sovereign States Rights
Within the 7 pages of the Declaration, Virginians are asked to understand the sacrifices of confederate leaders and soldiers during the Civil War crisis.
April also honors child abuse prevention, organ donations, financial literacy and crime victims in the state. McDonnell had the proclamation posted on his Governor's website last week, when it became noticed by media today.
McDonnell and State Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli were embroiled last month in a controversy when they attempted to remove special gay rights protections for state workers in public colleges and universities.
The proclamation could change that view among Republicans who believe appropriate respect for the state's Confederate past has been erased by an over-allegiance to political correctness, observers said.
Some academics and political conservatives have applauded McDonnell for his action, and say that it supports the fight for states rights and energizes his conservative base.
The NAACP of VA along with Virginia's legislative black caucus called the proclamation an insult to a large segment of the state's population, especially with the tacit approval of slavery.
"Governor McDonnell's proclamation was offensive and offered a disturbing revision of the Civil War and the brutal era that followed," said Del. Kenneth Cooper Alexander (D-Norfolk), chairman of the Legislative Black Caucus. "Virginia has worked hard to move beyond the very things for which Governor McDonnell seems nostalgic."
Richmond served as the capital of the Confederacy during the Civil War and many of its statesmen were slave holders. Since the Reconstruction period's beginning, the state in 1989 made L Douglas Wilder the first African American governor.
McDonnell's is eager to attract companies to Virginia in order to re-energize the state's economy. Some say that corporations might begin to perceive McDonnell's proclamation -- preceded by Cuccinelli's decision to sue the federal government over health-care reform legislation and his advice to state colleges and universities that they remove sexual-orientation language from their anti-discrimination policies -- as behaviors that may become liabilities for them and their employees.
McDonnell's proclamation comes just before the April 17, 1861, anniversary of the day Virginia seceded from the union.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States
Recommendations (39)
-
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Paul Conneally
Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
ACE PRESTON
Manhattan, New York, United States
-
bpulhem
New York, New York, United States -
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
Barbara McPherson
Nanaimo, Canada -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (26)
at 00:45 on April 7th, 2010
For many it will seem a little like modern Germany holding events to celebrate some of Hitler's actions - this couldn't happen in Germany though as it would be illegal.
Maybe a better tourist attraction would be a The Virginian theme park. The TV series is still running and for many it's all they know of Virginia that and the tragic Virginia Tech shootings.
I'm here in the UK but am thankful to Virginia Tech who at their Center for Digital Discourse host an archive of some of my work: haikumania
at 05:43 on April 7th, 2010
"For many it will seem a little like modern Germany holding events to celebrate some of Hitler's actions - this couldn't happen in Germany though as it would be illegal."
Unfortunately you're correct. The problem is that it's a major stretch to compare the extermination of 6 million Jews with the plight of American slaves or to compare the 600,000 Americans that died in the war between the states with the millions that died in WWII as a result of Germany's aggression.
at 10:38 on April 7th, 2010
Hi Rory - i see what you're saying - but that Specials song "War Crimes" comes to mind: "the numbers are different, the crime is still the same" - that song was inspired by the Israeli attacks on Beirut - I don't know enough about the American Civil War to say too much that's informed but the sentiments of the song sit well with me around most oppression. The ordinary guys that fight in wars usually do so at behest of some power-monger or another and at some point we get beyond 'celebrating' former wars to grieving the dead and the fact they ever happened or had to happen...
at 12:29 on April 7th, 2010
I had to add a story to complement SMK's good reporting. I anticipated this yesterday when I posted about General Lee contemplating surrender. His actual surrender will occur on April 9th (1865) and he wrote his signature in disappearing ink. So, they had to track him down a couple of days later and make him sign it again with real ink. That's a true story. Can't trust them Rebs.
at 10:43 on April 7th, 2010
Well, we should not compare tragedies at all. But I don't think that Paul is out of line with his comparison of the Holocaust and the 100+ years of African Americans being viewed as cattle. Many killings were not recorded and no opposing army came in to count dead bodies. I highly doubt that there was full disclosure from plantation to plantation as to the number of murdered slaves over the subsequent "generation". So lets not act as if the two events should not be mentioned in the same breath. Every other nation in the world puts the two events in the same hat except the country that was responsible. So, lets be a little more understanding of Paul's point.
at 14:13 on April 7th, 2010
Chris Cooper (not verified): Good try . . . is that really your name? : )
It seems like any sincere and contrary response to a topic such as this is not welcomed. Indeed, there's no room for an opposing voice here, because the choir is singing from the same songbook . . . .
at 12:10 on April 7th, 2010
From the Constitution of the Confederate States of America, enumerated under Section 9, Limits on Congress, Bill of Rights, adopted on March 11, 1861:
Source: usconstitution.net
The vision of the Confederate States of America hinged on the continued enslavement of the nearly 4 million enslaved persons of African descent in America during that time period, located primarily in the southern states, with the Confederacy distributing printed money with idyllic and pastoral imagery meant to portray slavery as a wondrous existence.
Source: rrcoins.net
Protection of individual states rights was the cry as the profiteers of the highly profitable business of slavery sought a cessation of all attempts to prevent the centuries long, legally sanctioned, inhuman practice.
Governor Robert McDonnell's explanation for why he did not mention slavery in his proclamation was an attempt to dismiss the cultural and monetary significance slavery played in the development of the United States, particularly at the time of the Civil War in the southern United States, can only be described as dishonest.
at 12:33 on April 7th, 2010
A call for impeachment is not out of order. Doing so, however, might ignite the Tea Party right into secession, don't you think?
at 12:46 on April 7th, 2010
No doubt about that. And they would likely be glad for the opportunity, YJ ; )
at 12:20 on April 7th, 2010
Thanks so much for all of that, KH. Yes, McDonnell is up to something, it has been clear to me for some time now....
at 14:43 on April 7th, 2010
You're welcome, SMK.
A few facts about slavery in Virginia:
Source: history.org
On February 24, 2007, the state of Virginia's lawmakers voted unanimously on a resolution to express "profound regret" for the state of Virginia's role in the enslavement of people of African descent.
Source: washingtonpost.com
at 14:15 on April 7th, 2010
McDonnell and Company have been up to something for some time now. In short- as has been written millions of times, The South will always fight the Civil War. They do have some history in their Confederacy and some of the multitudes who rose up against the North but, the North has always dominated the south in terms of educational awareness which allows for civil debate. The South it seems has always regarded education as a side issue. Many of the Southern States have the lowest educational levels in the nation, It is little wonder that to spice the tea of Southern Constituents so called leaders advocate confrontational and divisive tactics amongst it peoples. The Tea Party Movement is a clear example of the uneducated following a southern donkey swinging honey from its rear instead of normal donkey droppings. I would have no problem if the entire Southern States did secede along with Texas. Take their poor uneducated people and the pittance they donate to the federal Government and let them eat tea leaves.
at 15:41 on April 7th, 2010
I think the comparison to observing Hitler's regime in Germany is correct.I can not think of one reason to honor the Confederate which was a criminal. The worst part is that instead of being tried for WAR CRIMES they were allowed to set up JIM CROW laws all over the South and further punish the BLACKS which had been held as slaves.This is a total disgrace and every conscious Virginian should have this stricken from the books. The governor should be recalled,
at 16:15 on April 7th, 2010
jo an (not verified):
"I think the comparison to observing Hitler's regime in Germany is correct.I can not think of one reason to honor the Confederate which was a criminal."
There are millions of Americans descended from those that fought on the south's side during the war between the states.And their forefathers not only fought in the Civil War, but they fought in WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and throughout the Middle East. The slavery issue was the main impetus behind the war. But most of the Confederate soldiers that fought, didn't see it that way. They saw the war more in terms of defending their homes and families against encroachment by the federal government. Keep in mind that virtually all of those that fought on the confederate side during the Civil War never "owned" a slave.
Read some Bruce Catton books about the Civil War. Those books serve as a good primer for those , such as yourself, that have no knowledge of American history.
at 18:00 on April 7th, 2010
Rory, your statement that most Confederate soldiers were not fighting for slavery is partially true, in that the soldiers themselves did not see themselves as fighting for slavery.
However, with the 5%-6% of southern slaveholders organizing the seceded states into the Confederate States of America, with Jefferson Davis himself being a slaveholder, whether 'most' of those soldiers realized or acknowledged it, their fight for states' rights, " .... defending their homes and families against encroachment ....", theirs was a rebellion against the elected United States' president and government, with those secededing states doing so because an anti slavery leaning President Lincoln had been elected.
The history of the Confederate States of America as citizens defending their homeland is a fictional, romanticized rendering, offered to re-write history.
The valor and bravery on both sides should be acknowledged as, in war, soldiers are called upon to fight on the side with which, for the most part, they have affinity. In this case, one side was engaged in treasonous acts against the government.
The average non slaveholding soldier drafted into the Confederate Army, or volunteering, had little control over the politics in which he now found himself.
Just as those engaged in the abolition movement to free the enslaved, while slavery was still the law of the land, were criminals, those fighting in the Confederate Army in opposition to an elected U.S. government were also engaged in unlawful actions.
Source: americanhistory.suite101.com
at 18:29 on April 7th, 2010
Karen: I would like nothing better than to have an open and honest dialogue with you. However the last person that attempted that didn't fair too well and we all know what happened to him . . .don't we?
But I ain't him! With that said, I'll dare to say this: The first comment to this post set the tone. And when I see confederate soldiers equated to NAZIs and comments defending that equation, it tells me that I should just hush up and sit down . . . .
at 18:44 on April 7th, 2010
what happened to him . . .don't we?Long overdue and a valid editorial decision. He should have been cut off a longtime ago as he has been from several other sites. A cancer in the community needs to be surgically removed for the greater health of the host. Please don't blame Karen for that. It was an editorial decision and a damn fine one in my opinion
at 05:12 on April 8th, 2010
Royneededremoval (not verified): HA! That's funny! Well he sure was removed in more ways the one!
But please don't blame me or others for refraining from commenting on and recommending stories that contain a racial component vis a vis African Americans. After all, no one wants to be deemed "a cancer in the community". If the choir is happy singing from the same page of the same song book over and over again so be it. The problem for the choir, however, is that people will get tired of hearing that same song over and over again and ultimately stop listening.
at 05:58 on April 8th, 2010
Hi RoryDiffering opinions are the lifeblood of debate. Your comments are civil, rational and frequently data supported. I fully support your rights to express contrary opinions to the writer. Roy was in a whole other category of hate speech, obsessive observations, distorted understanding and circular logic. He needed to go for the greater good, You I would want to encourage to stay and comment for exactly the same reason. You are a positive force in he NP community, Roy was a diseaseThanks and I look forward to your future observations
at 08:32 on April 8th, 2010
Royneededremoval (not verified): Oh what joy!
"Differing opinions are the lifeblood of debate."
Yes! That's precisely my point! But I don't see any differing opinions here! They're all of the same mindset! You're familiar with yin and yang I'm sure. Opposing forces that ultimately merge and become one in the same. What that translates into is balance.
It is oh so predictable that any time someone posts a story about America's institutions, culture, values, mores, etc. virtually all comments invariably contain invidious and absurd comparisons to America and fascist and dictatorial regimes such as Hitler's Germany. And one of the interesting things about those that make these comparisons is that they never compare America to Stalin's Russia in which millions upon millions were murdered and literally starved to death. And the reason why they don't make that comparison is obvious--because in many respects, they subscribe to Stalin's ideology.
The facts are that in NAZI Germany, an entire race of people (Jews) were marked for literal extermination as if they were nothing but mere insects. And virtually all non-Jewish German citizens went along with it. Six million Jews were murdered by any number of means. And the extermination would have continued until there was not one Jew left on the face of the earth had countries such as America, Britain, and yes, Russia, not gone to war against Germany.
Had America sat back and done nothing during WWII, the face of Europe would have been completely different today. And those Europeans that just love to go on about what a terrible country America is, wouldn't even be allowed to express their views in speech and in writing.
Slavery was the impetus behind the Civil War. And the war would have occurred much sooner had President Andrew Jackson not prevailed in preserving the Union. Brothers fought against brothers in that war. Generations were destroyed. Homes were burnt to the ground. Union troops murdered, raped, looted and pillaged. Hatred and animosity lingered for decades upon decades. But the facts are that the overwhelming majority of Confederate soldiers (those that fought for the south) did not own slaves. And in their minds, their fight against the Union transcended the slavery issue. They believed that they were fighting for a nobler cause.
I've said it before and I say it again: People need to cast off their ideological blinders and crack open some history books. Only then will they stop seeing things merely in terms of black and white . . . .
at 18:43 on April 8th, 2010
In fact, Rory, only about 25% of those fighting in the Confederate Army during the Civil War were slaveholders.
As far as blinders go, there is a need for many Southerners to come to grips with the fact that DESPITE their ancestors' most likely highly PERSONAL motivations for fighting on the side of the Confederacy, the war waged was waged on behalf of those states that proclaimed they no longer belonged to the United States of America, seceding in an attempt to continue slavery and the way of life of which those who owned slaves had become accustomed.
It's not a Black thing or a White thing; it's a history thing.
To pretend the war wasn't about the desire of the seceding states to withdraw from the United States because they wanted to preserve slavery as a system, with those states claiming their states' rights to maintain the system of slavery, is ridiculous.
As far as a correlation between Nazi Germany and the Confederacy and its fight to preserve the system of chattel slavery, in relation to the dehumanization, torture, neglect and murder of an entire people, a reasonable comparison can be made.
Chattel slavery had progressed in parts of the so called New World to the most deplorable realization that it was cheaper to work an enslaved person to death and replace him or her than to maintain his or her life.
As in Nazi Germany and its officially enacted policies, the policies related to chattel slavery in the United States in the southern states were the legally enacted legislation of the states.
Source: pbs.org
at 21:09 on April 10th, 2010
The unresolved contradictions that existed before and after the War Between the States, a.k.a. the Civil War, has resulted in various factions discussing the secession of almost half of the states in the United States of America as if those states had existed as independent entities, not of the U.S., who were unjustly attacked and forced to defend themselves.
That is not the reality of the circumstances.
Source: pbs.org
The compromise spoken of in the above highlight was the Compromise of 1850, a series of bills which included the Fugitive Slave Act.
Source: pbs.org
After the Civil War began:
Source: pbs.org
at 16:33 on April 7th, 2010
Susan, this has since been added to Governor McDonnell's proclamation:
Source: governor.virginia.gov
I'm not sure the Sons of Confederate Veterans, who requested the proclamation, would approve.
Source: splcenter.org
A Sons of Confederate Veterans' spokesperson Brandon Dorsey addressed the group's decision to ask Governor McDonnell to issue the proclamation:
Source: voices.washingtonpost.com
The Governor has issued an apology for the original proclamation's omission of any reference to slavery:
Source: www2.timesdispatch.com
at 19:43 on April 7th, 2010
Yes, I doubt they has such additional words in mind, and there is much nostalgia and much which cannot be overcome in the Southern psyche, for some. McDonnell has this modus operndi: Tips his hand, shows all 5 fingers at once , steps back, acquieces .
at 17:46 on April 8th, 2010
Let us not be too easy to pass this action by this Governor off. It is clear to me that their is a tremendous resurgence of Ku Klux Klan mentality in a lot of the coded messages this governor and other right wing elected officials are using. The Tea Party wing nuts who influence these So called responsible politicians demand nothing less than to resume that war with a different approach. Secessionist ambitions and the use of the word 'nullify" are part and portion of these coded words. Thus McDonnell being a straw man like all of his associates with the same views occupy a seat of scrutiny right now and rightfully so. I am not sorry to say this folks but the only difference between the fringe lunatics in the Tea Party Movement and the KKK is that the Tea party folks have discarded the robes and Pointed Hats. I would urge the author of this article to continue pursuing this story with continued updates.
at 14:09 on April 10th, 2010
Source: civilwarhome.com