Vancouver study finds free heroin reduces crime: BC reviewing Study

by Barry Artiste | October 19, 2008 at 05:25 am
748 views | 7 Recommendations | 15 comments

Photos

Vancouver study finds free heroin reduces crime: BC reviewing Study

Vancouver study finds free heroin reduces crime: BC reviewing Study

see larger image

uploaded by eastvanray

Barry Artiste Op/Ed

You know I do not even know where to begin in all this, first taking blame away from addicts whose excuses for their addiction ranging from rape to murder, now have a new ally. More Heroin, and wait for it............................................it's FREE!

What's next? One can be certain there will be a study on alcoholism, Rubbies and the working Alcoholics alike who commit crimes and or murder while under the influence may also get a sympathetic judicial ear, perhaps a "Free Pass Get out of Jail Card", and to even one better, alcoholics who drink the cheap stuff, may supersize their addictions and say they are addicted to RVSP 20 year old Schotch, so they can line up for a free bottle versus the Aqua Velva they usually consume.

Currently the Supreme Court of British Columbia has struck down a ruling that now allows Transients to set up Tent Cities in our Taxpayer supported Parks and the associated litter and eyesore that follows.  I for one say, Okay send the Homeless tent people to the Supreme Court Justices home, and let them set up Tents on their Front Lawn!

Vancouver City Hall for one has a Tent City on their Doorstep, and are allowing it for fear of reprisal for special interest groups.

To that I say par for the course in Leftville BC, obviously we have a Mayor without a spine to kick some ass. Granted housing is on serious short supply, but they are doing something about it, it takes time, most hotels and rooming houses are currently being bought and renovated in large numbers by BC housing all over the city, as past tenants and slum lords who owned it before BC housing took over, let it go into ruin.

Rest assured the more FREE housing we provide the Dregs of Society from all over Canada will ride the Rails to the BC Mecca of FREE, thus a never ending cycle of more and more homeless.

We one day will be known as the City of the Free Homes for everyone, while those with families who are working menial jobs to make ends meet and need housing, will be pushed aside in favour of the Druggies and Unemployed who feel working is a Four Letter Word.

Now giving Free heroin, will just allow a Free Shooting Gallery with Cable TV instead of the city streets and back alleys. Thank Christ the Federal Conservatives under Stephen Harper got in, and let's hope The Prime Minister and the Federal Conservative state to the BC Government that any Federal Health Transfer payments they receive better not go anywhere near this FairyLand Heroin Induced program, if they wish to implement it.

Taxpayers I am sure will agree we need to nip this study in the Bud, before the British Columbia Government Bleeding Hearts in all due haste use our Taxdollars and give out Free Trips to Addicts, without having to leave the Farm. What we need is a long term incarceration of those addicted in the form of treatment to stop COLD TURKEY, job training as well.

If they refuse, then screw em, you are on your own. It is time this Province gets a Law and Order Backbone and tells everyone the Free Taxpayer Ride is over, you wants something, ya better god damn well work for it like the rest of us.

http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=027f3392-9e41-45f5-8e4c-bfdec60e3c9c

Vancouver study finds free heroin reduces crime NAOMI project reveals heroin addicts can be treated with legal painkiller

Cheryl Chan, The Province Published: Saturday, October 18, 2008

A legal painkiller called Dilaudid is more effective in treating serious heroin addiction than methadone therapy, according to a groundbreaking Canadian study.

The North American Opiate Medication Initiative, also known as NAOMI, examined the effectiveness of prescription heroin on hard-core addicts in Vancouver and Montreal, who have repeatedly failed treatment in the past.

Over a 12 to 15-month period beginning March 2007, 115 addicts in the study were prescribed medical-grade heroin, while 25 addicts were given hydromorphone or Dilaudid in a double-blind study.

A control group of 111 addicts received oral methadone. The results, released Friday, showed improved physical and psychological health, a decrease in illicit heroin use and a drop in criminal activities among all participants.

The retention rate for addicts receiving heroin or Dilaudid was 88 per cent.

All but one of the addicts receiving Dilaudid were not able to distinguish it from heroin.

recommend This comment thread is now closed
eastvanray
eastvanray
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 09:33 on October 23rd, 2008

Barry Artiste, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Hey Barry, my heart is with you but my wallet says "prescribing" a legal alternative to herion is MUCH cheaper for us taxpayers.  On one side you have a 5% to 10% chance of successfully getting addicts off heroin using current treatment methods.  Add to that the costs of treatment, and when treatment fails (as it usually does) you have police, courts, incarceration, property loss claims by the victoms of the property crimes and the substantial health care costs when these addicts end up in hospitals for the various reasons that addicts do (overdose, Hep, HIV, liver failure, getting beat up.......).  I am not in any way a promoter of opiate use but sometimes we have to ask the question: "Is this a good expenditure of tax dollars?"

0
Barry Artiste

Thanks for the flag and  comments Eastray, I agree in part Eastray, but when does it end, drunks wanting free booze, meth addicts wanting pescription grade crack., I think send them off somewhere, COld Turkey, and make damn sure they are not dropped back into their own neighbourhood, where friends and peer pressure will put them right back on Heroin.

Giving free heroin is not going to get them to quit, that is like giving a smoker 5 cigarettes, or a drunk 5 ounces of scotch instead of liquid shoe polish in the hopes they quit.


Barbara McPherson
Barbara McPherson
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 10:29 on October 23rd, 2008

Barry Artiste, I like this story. It's good stuff.  Gee, if I threaten to litter, do you think I can get some free VSOP cognac?

0
Barry Artiste

Ha, Thanks Barbara for the flag and comments, good luck in getting the cognac.

0
nessachu

Regardless of how people have gotten to the point where they are addicted to drugs, the issue that our community needs to deal with is how as a society we help treat these people with an addiction. To sweep the problem away under the guise that it's an individual choice and therefore not my problem, is our societies' greatest failure. We do not tell heart disease patients that they deserved their current state of health because they chose a stagnant unhealthy lifestyle. We don't judge them and tell them that they do not have the right to seek treatment. Neither is poverty a product of the poor's inability to find work or education.

Addiction, whether you believe it to be a moral or immoral, is ultimately a disease that needs to be treated like heart disease, cancer, depression, etc. It is a mental health and physical health problem, which also leads to societal issues that we all share in.

The North American Opiate Medication Initiative is one of several studies around the world that have looked at alternative ways to treat heroin addiction including heroin assisted treatment. We need to understand the facts of what NAOMI is about before we reject it. Heroin assisted treatment is about controlling the quality and quantity of drug used by its patients.  When we take street drugs (which are often laced with many different kinds of chemicals and often used in a very unsafe environment leading to the spread of HIV, HEP C) out of the equation and provide safe clean heroin used in a controlled environment under medical supervision, we not only control a person's use of the drug, but we dramatically reduce overdose and the spread of HIV and HEP C. The economic costs of offering heroin assisted treatment further significantly reduces crime and the burden on healthcare for these patients. They do not need to commit crimes in the city to be able to purchase street drugs, and overdose and treatment of HIV and HEP is reduced dramatically, relieving a tremendous amount of tax dollars that would go to secondary issues related to street drug use.

Further, NAOMI is a treatment space where these individuals who often have mental illness and suffer tremendous societal difficulties can access doctors, social workers, and psychologists. Through heroin assisted treatment, these individuals gain a certain amount of stability in their lives. Even though they remain dependent on drugs, this treatment brings them into the treatment system so that they can receive help to deal with the various complicated problems they face in their lives, including housing.

Harm reduction is about humanity. It is about health.  It is about finding ways to treat a problem that society has neglected for much too long in a way that recognizes the challenges and needs of the patient group.  The "it's a choice and therefore not my problem attitude", IS the problem. We have to start looking at the problem of drugs in Vancouver as a health problem and to start thinking of ways to support individuals who suffer from it. Poverty, health, housing, security are all interrelated. NAOMI attempts to tackle the problem from the health perspective, but the results trickle into every aspect of patient's lives, and into the wellbeing of the community.

Get educated about it: http://www.naomistudy.ca/


0
eastvanray

I was with you but comments like this totally discredit the rest of your points....

"The "it's a choice and therefore not my problem attitude", IS the problem."

If you believe that then you have either never been to the DTES or you have some reason not to attribute any of the problem to the choices people make.  Individual personal responsibility comes first.  Take responsibility for your actions and THEN society will see you as someone worthy of help.  I did not jam that needle into your arm and my "attitude" is not the problem here.

0
Barry Artiste

Damn straight EastRay, couldn't have said it better myself.  Many do not know, I have to deal with junkies, as many have read my articles as well as seen personal photos I have posted, such as "Crack Art" of all the herion shooting gallerys and crack houses I have had to go to in my many years.

0
Barry Artiste

Thanks for the comments Nessachu, but I have never heard of someone with Heart Disease robbing someone for a Cheeseburger, though your point is well taken.  Addicts need treatment, but not Heroin!

'that is the same as giving a heart patient  a cheeseburger instead of a Big Mac, of light cigarrettes to a cancer patient,.  Bottom line, they have to want to quit, otherwise we are wasting our taxdollars, It is not like junkies were not warned about the dangers of drugs, governments have spent billions on adverstising about its effect, and billion on treatment,  Some get cured, some dont.

You cannot give junkies heroin as treatment.


0
Vinicius

I would love to see your passion defending the so-called tax payers money when the goverment buy guns or allow rich people to get richer.  I do not expect you would take the time and the effor that nessachu did, reading and getting educated, but I expect respect.

Sounds crazy, heroin for heroin addicts. I know. You said: 'that is the same as giving a heart patient  a cheeseburger instead of a Big Mac'.  I never heard that a doctor denied treatment to this patients when he or she actually eats a burguer, getting worst and then, going to the hospital again, getting free medications, free attention. But for addicted people you have a full loaded gun, ready to shoot them, or putting them in a ship heading neverland.  Why we do not do that to all the people we do not like? Oh, let me remind you, people thinking like you wanted to do the same for AIDS patients back in the '80s. Yes, let's deny health care to every person whose life style is not approved by... you? Ok, if you are diabetic and you eat suggar, the goverment should not provide you treatment.  Also, if you have a heart condition and do not excercise, and so on.

You do not have to like 'junkies', but they have the rights.  Treatment is one of them. As far as I followed the discussion, you did not even read what heroin treatment is about.  You just don't understand it and in a very dangerous way, you just comment on something about you have no clue.

 

0
eastvanray

Where do I start?  Heroin is illegal.  It kills people.  It distroys lives.  I doubt a doctor would inject an AIDS patient with the HIV virus even if doing so would give the AIDS patient momentary relief. 

"Yes, let's deny health care to every person whose life style is not approved by... you?" Last I checked this is not accepted "health care" in the broad medical community (any articles in respected medical peer review journals? - no I didn't think so). 

As I had a close family member who was addicted to heroin I do not offer my opinion from a vacuum.  My relative had to STOP using heroin to change his life.  Giving him free heroin may have prevented him from stealing from family members temperarily but it would not have got him clean and sober.

"You do not have to like 'junkies', but they have the rights.  Treatment is one of them."  Yes TREATMENT not maintenence of a deadly addictive behaviour. 

It is you who do not understand.  I have lived with the heroin problem and I know a little about which I speak. 

0
Barry Artiste

And because people cannot help themselves, with your logic weaning them off their addiction makes as much sense as giving drunks free scotch, and children to pedophiles, perhaps even buy them a puppy and a used white van.

You obviously have comments without a clue.  The only way to stop is cold turkey,.  ya turkey!@


0
Barry Artiste

Wish I had said that EastVan

0
Billay

Well, any taxpayer that is informed understands that this program is an incredible step to reducing tolls and costs to them will support this idea. Any person versed in science and the scientific process understands that efficacy is more important than frivolous token statements like 'tough on crime'. Any historian will tell you that reusing methods that have failed in the past, over and over and over again, like 'lock them up for a long time and give the job training', is neither helpful, beneficial, or cost effective. And any one who has ever been through true hardship (keep in mind TRUE) would know better than to offer the 'suck it up' attitude.

This treatment program is one of the greatest programs in drug treatment that I have ever seen. It is incredible, just how far in front of the times it is, by comparison to other interventions and treatments. The only reason it may not be used is because it's counterintuitive. People who look only at the surface of the program: giving free drugs to addicts, will probably respond with ignorant comments much like your own. Anyone who understands the issue, as many people that I affiliate do, marvel at this new treatment. Though I say 'new' it's not really, pure nicotine infusement has been used for smokers... but I guess maybe you're right, why bother giving these people a treatment that works and that benefits both them and us? Let's just throw the dregs in jail!?!?  Right?!?!

This program works. Bottom line.


0
eastvanray

"any taxpayer that is informed" "Any person versed in science" "Any historian" "And any one who has ever been through true hardship"

Wow you are the smartest person I have ever encountered!  What other universal thruths can you empart on the world?

I can only assume that you are not associating with any of the people from the above classes since many who I know, and a couple who qualify as all of the above, disagree with this policy.  Perhaps you should get out of the Portland Hotel Society office once and a while and talk to real people.

 

0
Billay

Yes. I couldn't agree more.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from