NP Rank:
Vancouver's Secret $100M Loan to Olympic Developer
NowPublic will be updating this story with more information. Check back for further details.
This will certainly add fuel to the city of Vancouver's hotly contested civic election, which will be held on November 15th.
Vision Vancouver mayoral hopeful Gregor Robertson Thursday called for an emergency council session to allow public debate on reports the city will loan $100 million to developers of the troubled Olympic Village.He also challenged Coun. Peter Ladner, mayoral candidate for the Non-Partisan Association, to spill what he knows about the deal, apparently made at an in-camera meeting on Oct. 14.
Ladner is chairman of the city's finance committee.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
ianivs
Vancouver, Canada -
houseoftext
Surrey, British Columbia, Canada -
eyesplashMikul
Vancouver (North West End / Stanley Park), Canada -
GAry.Photography
Hong Kong -
michaelv2008
Squamsih, British Columbia, Canada -
chasemaxfield
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States -
vanrockfeller
Canada -
Sturmvogel
Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 11:09 on November 7th, 2008
Robertson's letter includes 5 questions for Ladner:
It is essential for Vancouver taxpayers that you immediately answer five key questions as a start:
at 13:01 on November 7th, 2008
The fact that no one is saying anything about this makes it a very weird situation.
at 15:39 on November 7th, 2008
I heard Vision Councillor Raymond Louie and NPA's Peter Ladner talking about this issue on CKNW's Christie Clark show today. Ladner wasn't scheduled to appear but he heard what was being said on the radio and he was madder than hell and phoned in. The two men were both excited and talked over each other at times.
Louie had been saying that although HE VOTED FOR the deal, he now felt that he had not been given all of the information he needed to make an informed decision. He has since learned that Estelle Low, the City accountant, had concerns about this deal. She was apparently not at the meeting. There is a rumor, which Clark couldn't get confirmation on, that Low has resigned over this matter.
Louie said that he had made requests for relevant documents on the case but he has not been given what he's requested. [Vision is the pot calling the kettle black. I'm currently writing about a case in which Vision's Eleanor Gregory -- who is very close to Vision mayoral candidate Gregor Robertson -- failed to turn over a key document that a Vancouver woman requested about her own case at the
VSB, a copy of which the VSB has already acknowledged she has a right. Vision's Andrea Reimer is implicated in secrecy and an alleged cover-up -- supported by documentation -- in this case as well, which dates back to Reimer's time on School Board. Reimer/'s conduct contributed to the fact that there is now an Int'l Boycott of VSB diplomas. But that's a different scandal.]
Ladner then phoned in to CKNW. He was not at his most composed; he seemed upset. He said that Louie had been at the same meeting as him, the one in which the decision had been made, and that nothing had happened on the issue since. His point was that Louie knew as much as he did. But Louie retorted that being Chair of Finance, Ladner was privy to more information than he was.
Ladner mentioned at one point that Estelle Low is currently in Hong Kong, where he said she goes at this time every year to visit her mother. He claimed that words were being put into Low's mouth "which is scandalous in my opinion".
It is no coincidence, Ladner noted, that at a time when Gregor Robertson's unpaid skytrain fine is front page news, Vision goes public with this issue.
Ladner was asked again by Louie if he would agree to a public meeting to bring this out into the open. Ladner did not agree, saying that to work on this type of negotiation requires a confidential setting and that the public knows that's the way it is always done.
Shortly after the CKNW interview, there was a press conference. It was pointed out on CKNW news that none of the Vision members who voted for that potential $100 million loan to developers showed up at the press conference to answer questions.
at 08:44 on November 8th, 2008
The suggestion that the current problems and loan from the City could affect the City's credit rating is just left wing silliness. This loan is from the City's Property Endowment Fund of $2Billion. The City has the right to tax us all to pay its debts. The tax base backing up the City's obligations is hundreds of Billions of dollars - to even suggest that a $100Million loan to a developer of land the City owns could affect its credit rating is absurd.
The best thing that can happen with this project is for Millennium to default on its obligations. This is leased land, if the developer does not perform the lease is cancelled. The lender, Fortress, would then lose its entire investment and the City would end up with ownership of the entire project for $100Million less what Millennium have already paid on the land lease. Who knows - they may have already paid $130Million and the City would have the project for free and put $30Million more in the Property Endownment Fund. This would be a huge windfall for the City, as taxpayers we should all pray that it happens. Don't worry - it won't. I don't think that Fortress' creditors are going to let it happen. Fortress is the owner of Whistler Blackcomb - its lenders stepped up last week and refinanced around $1.5 Billion of Fortress debt. They are not going to throw away the $300 to $500Million Fortress has in the Millennium project just to let the City own it for peanuts.