Vet and Iraq War Resistor Faces 'Misconduct' Trial in St.Louis,MO

by globalpunditorg | April 16, 2009 at 09:28 pm
144 views | 1 Recommendation | 5 comments

Videos

March On The Pentagon: IVAW (Matthis Chiroux)

see larger video

sourced by globalpunditorg

March On The Pentagon: IVAW (Matthis Chiroux)

Photos

war resistor St Matthis Chiroux adddresses Mar 21 answer rally

war resistor St Matthis Chiroux adddresses Mar 21 answer rally

see larger image

uploaded by globalpunditorg

Exclusive Interview: Sgt.Matthis Chiroux -Veteran, war resistor, and outspoken critic of the both the Bush and Obama administrations Mid East and Central Asian Policy faces Military Hearing for "Misconduct" on April 21st. We spoke to Matthis about his upcoming case.

 War resistor, Afghan veteran, and member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, Sgt. Matthis Chiroux, faces a "Misconduct" hearing on April 21/09 for refusal to deploy to Iraq. His hearing will take place in St. Louis, at 1 Reserve Way, Overland, MO.

Chiroux, an Individual Ready Reservist, publicly refused activation and deployment orders to Iraq, citing the war as "an illegal and immoral occupation". He has also chosen to stay on U.S. soil to " to defend himself from any charges brought against him by the military".

In a press release he declared "My resistance as a noncommissioned officer to this abhorrent occupation is just as legitimate now as it was last year"
 
"Soldiers have a duty to adhere to the international laws of war described as supreme in Article 6, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which we swear to abide by before the orders of any superior, including our former or current president."
 
Readers may remember Chiroux as one of the 'Hempstead 15', 10 veterans and 5 citizen protesters who were arrested on the night of the final presidential debate at Hofstra University, Long Island, NY. Before the Oct 15 event, IVAW presented requests to ask one question of candidates Sen. McCain and Sen. Obama. The IVAW were rebuffed, and in an act of nonviolent civil disobedience, IVAW broached security lines.
 
During the melee, Sgt Nick Morgan was stepped on by a police horse. Morgan's case is still in court. As one veteran noted, "the candidates have all the time for Joe the Plumber, while Nick the Vet gets his skull crushed."
 
Curiously, charges of "Misconduct" for Chiroux's refusal to redeploy were not brought against him until three days after the Hofstra incident. His intial refusal to deploy came after witnessing the May 15,08 testimony of 9 other soldiers describing to members of U.S. Congress what they precieved as atrocities  contravening international law and rules of engagement.
 
In the press release prepared for the Misconduct hearing, Chiroux stated "I go now to St. Louis to honor my promises and convictions"
"Obama or No-Bama, the military must cease prosecuting Soldiers of conscience, and we will demonstrate to them why."
 
Directly after the hearing, Chiroux and IVAW members will publicly testify on specific experiences that led them to resist the "occupation". Illustrating the Orwellian reframing of the U.S. presence, they remind people that the former 'Global War on Terror' is now the Overseas Contingency Operation'

I had a chance to catch up with Sgt Chiroux amid a very busy schedule from Strassbourg, where he was participating in the protests of the G20 Summit.

 
SD: Your initial court date was changed - why?


 
Chiroux: My former JAG attourney volunteered for Iraq service and was deployed a number of weeks ago. Thus, I had to get a new lawyer and a new court date. I think the Army may have been hoping I'd already bought tickets for people to be in attendence and it would have wiped out my finances. Lucky for me, I'm a last minute kinda guy. My replacement is a JAG attourney. Thomas M. Roughneen
 SD: It's not on a military base - is there a meaning to that?
 
Chiroux: No meaning, I don't think. This is the home of the U.S. Army's Individual Ready Reserve, though, so any other Army IRRers who refuse to deploy and demand hearings will have them in the same place. We're going to try to demonstrate to the military how foolish prosecuting folks and bringing activists to their doorstep over and over again would be.

SD:  What is the official charge you face?
 
Chiroux:  "Misconduct." They're trying to throw me out of the Army for it. I'm happy to be discharged from the Army, but will not submit to my refusal to deploy being characterized as misconduct.
 
SD: Are you confident about your prospects?
 
Chiroux:  I'm pretty confident I won't go to jail, as they'd have to upgrade this hearing from administrative to judicial, but I highly doubt the military will tell me I'm right and send me home to celebrate. That's why GI Resistence is so important to ending U.S. Imperialism. The forces that be refuse to do what's right, so we need to make them do right by leaving them no other choice.
 
SD: What is the maximum and minimum punishment?
 
Chiroux: Well, this isn't a court-marshal, so the worst thing I face right now is something other than an honorable discharge. That could change though if the Army get's a bug up their ass and decides to Court Marshal me.

SD:  Will you be given a chance to have witnesses?
 
Chiroux:  Yes, I'll have a few witnesses. Not in the actual "case" but afterward when they're deciding what punishment I should recieve should they find me guilty. I think the term for the section is "mitigation." I'll have Marjorie Conn, president of the National Lawyers Guild on hand to offer constitutional testimony. As well, I may have a vet or two, and I'm going to submit Winter Soldier testimony to the record, as well my letter from Congress and a number of letters of support from former NCO's of mine.
 (ed. the Congressional letter contains signatures of support from members of the Progressive Caucus, including Rep's Kucinich, Conyers, Woolsey, and more than a dozen others)
 
 SD: What corners have you recieved support from?
 
Chiroux: Just about every corner of the American and European Antiwar movement. A lot of socialists and libertarians, which really excites me as it suggests we've found an issue that can unite even those with almost oposite political sentiments.
 
 SD: Do you have faith in the U.S. legal process?
 
Chiroux: I have little faith in the legal process in the U.S. I have every faith in my ability to survive the legal process in the U.S. I'm a fighter, and they know that. Even if they put me in jail, which I think is unlikely, it'll only make me fight harder.
 
 SD: What are you hoping to convey to the court and the public through this case?
 
Chiroux: That war resisters are not criminals. We are not cowards. We are the best, brightest, most dedicated and conscientous folks America has to offer. It's time for the conscience of our nation to stir. We are so intelligent, yet we are serving ignorance, and there are few more pathetic sights to behold. Rise up my people rise up!
 
SD: Are there legal precedents for your actions?
 
Chiroux: The Nuremberg Trials come to mind. However, many have decided International Law should not apply, despite Art. 6 Para. 2 of the Constitution. I don't think anyone's outright won a war resistence case in the U.S., but there's a first time for everything.
 
SD: You have said you want to remain in America. Have you thought of leaving America?
 
Chiroux:  Sure. I'm in Europe right now! But I'm coming home. I won't run from the Army. They are absolutely nothing to be scared of. Like a hognose snake, they'll puff up and look mean, but when rolled on their backs they'll play dead. And even if they do bite, I bite harder.
 
 SD:  The antiwar / Anti Imperialist movement is in flux since Obama's election and a LOT of the peace movement is giving him a "wait and see" pass like they did with Kerry in 2004. What is your message for the "blind faith" Obama supporters?
 
Chiroux:  Just because we have a black president doesn't mean we can't have a racist war. Obama's expanding the war now in Afghanistan and into Pakistan, just like Johnson (and Nixon) expanded the Vietnam War into Cambodia. He's plotted us on a clear course from Imperialism to Imperialism-Light. But as any ex-smoker will tell you, just because you switched from Reds to Lights doesn't mean you've kicked the habit!
 
SD: You were just in Strassbourg for the G 20 summit and are still in Europe making you're way back to the U.S. for your trial.
 Is it fair to say that citizens and media in Europe have a VERY different undertanding of the geopolitical scene than North Amercans? What would be some examples?

 Chiroux: I was in Strasbourg for the anti-NATO summit in response to the NATO summit taking place just a few miles away.
 Before the first day of the planned demonstrations, police attacked young demonstrators with tear gas, grenades, batons and even rocks.
 In response, those kids not only didn't go home, they burnt down half the city including a police station not but half a kilometer away from where Obama was speaking. I've never seen that kind of thing in the states before...well not yet anyway. U.S. politicians should prevent this type of uprising in the U.S. by protecting the peoples' right to demonstrate and shutting down their imperialist agendas now.

You can join Sgt Chiroux and reporter Stephen Dohnberg live on CFRB 1010's 'Sunday Nights With Steve and Liana Kerzner' this Sunday April 19 at 8 p.m. Eastern. The call-in program can be heard internationally via live streaming from CFRB's homepage. International and long-distance callers can phone using a toll-free line.
 


recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
lds_colejv

Seems to be a charismatic young man who enjoys activism. I wonder what he does to pay the bills.

I don't remember seeing any atrocities in Iraq, and I personally believe that any that have occurred are due to individuals not the military as a whole. I take a stance very similar to David Kilkullen, I may not believe what got us there, but now that we are there we need to finish it correctly.

I believe the young NCO believes he is leading from the front, and that others may feel differently. I for one do feel he may be taking the wrong course, but that is my opinion.

0
globalpunditorg

 

 and a completely relevent opinion!  thanks for your input. *tip of the cap*

0
Debra

I respect him for what he is doing. He has an obligation to the military, but they also have an obligation to the soldiers. Not to lead them into danger based on a lie. As this young man is saying "that" war was illegal because it was based on a lie and the personal agenda of a sitting president, his family and others in his cabinet. Bush and Chaney should have been tried for war crimes. For all of the families who lost their loved ones, I am sure that they would not have sacificed the lives of them for Bush or Chaney, given a choice. Everyone knows that the war was based on a lie that many want to just ignore.     

0
Ivaw'less

Unfortunately Matthis' background is not holding up and it appears more and more he is capitalizing on the situation for personal gain.  He has been recieving vast amounts of financial support via the IVAW and directly through his website that are being reported by other IVAW members is being used to pay for his apartment in Brooklyn, living expenses and chemical recreation.  A lot of his statements are looking suspicious, he did not come from a poor southern family (his dad is an PhD working for NASA), he never set foot in Iraq, he spent maybe one week in Afghanistan and he deployed once to the Phillipines with a detachment of Marines, who needed a journalist, where he claims he engaged in a rape of a Phillipine girl with his "army" buddies.  Besides if he really did engage in a rape, as he confesses on his site, wouldn't he be willing to go to the Phillipines to face charges as he has done here in the U.S. with the Army?  The IVAW could do a lot better.

0
globalpunditorg

 

  agreed - if these allegations are true then it is inclumbent on the IVAW to self audit itself. sadly we have all seen good organizations become undermined by their own hubris.

however - i do not believe matthis has ever said he was in Iraq, and he does address the situation in the Phillippines as part of his open letter regarding his winter soldier testimony in st.louis  - posted at www,matthisresists.us  - so i believe it's contingent on all to keep a level head and continue to research and ask questions - not just jump to assumptions and accept accusations.

 

what matthis might have personally defined as "rape" could also be a matter of personal conscience.

as someone who had followed the hempstead 15, matthis charges, and in fact - the IVAW since late 2003 - i did recieve some letters accusing Matthis of certain things - however when I went to contact the people who emailed me, i got 'bounce back' messages since they were from fake email addresses.

one has to do better than that when engaging in accusations - whether felonious or ad hominem - wouldn't everyone agree?

 

 

 

 

 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 10:05 AM, May 21, 2009 by Anonymous (not verified)
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (1)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from