NP Rank:
Vietnam massacre soldier 'sorry'
The US army officer convicted for his part in the notorious My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War has offered his first public apology, a US report says.
"There is not a day that goes by that I do not feel remorse for what happened," Lt William Calley was quoted as saying by the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer.
He was addressing a small group at a community club in Columbus, Georgia.
Calley, 66, was convicted on 22 counts of murder for the 1968 massacre of 500 men, women and children in Vietnam.
I am so suprised that William Calley has kept his rank? They shot innocent women and children and now he states he was under orders.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines
Recommendations (50)
-
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States -
albertacowpoke
Canada -
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
-
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
The_Cynic
Freddy Beach, Where the deer r, Canada -
Karen Hatter
All Locations, Everywhere, United States -
Blue Crush
Toronto, Canada -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (15)
at 02:18 on August 22nd, 2009
No doubt he was "under orders". Thanks for this, Babel-Fish.
at 02:51 on August 22nd, 2009
He was initially sentenced to life in prison. Two days later, however, President Nixon made the controversial decision to have Calley released from prison, pending appeal of his sentence. Calley's sentence was later adjusted, so that he would eventually serve four and one-half months in a military prison at Fort Benning.
Most of the enlisted men who were involved in the events at My Lai had already left military service, and were thus legally exempt from prosecution. In the end, of the 26 men initially charged, Calley's was the only conviction.
Some have argued that the outcome of the My Lai courts-martial was a reversal of the laws of war that were set forth in the Nuremberg and Tokyo War Crimes Tribunals. Secretary of the Army Howard Callaway was quoted in the New York Times as stating that Calley's sentence was reduced because Calley honestly believed that what he did was a part of his orders — a rationale that stands in direct contradiction of the standards set at Nuremberg and Tokyo, where German and Japanese soldiers were executed for similar acts.
at 03:29 on August 22nd, 2009
As an ex-serviceman myself if I had been given such orders that included kill innocent women and children I would not of carried them out even with a gun pointed at my head.
There is a certain line one does not cross as a human being what was done at My Lai was in human and could of on be done by cowardly and cruel beasts.
at 08:01 on August 22nd, 2009
While Lt Calley was responsible for what happened with his platoon, there are others that walked free. There were several Generals doing overwatch in helicopters and did nothing, but they chose to go after the lowest common denominator.
The people giving the orders should have been nailed along with those following them. Babel you also know that 2nd Lts, although platoon commanders, are really being mentored by their Platoon Sergeants.
It is also no secret that the draft that existed then produced an undisciplined army. Not having served under the conditions of Vietnam, I won't judge those that did. It takes a toll when a rifle platoon is told to take a hill, lose some of its members, just to be told to step back to take it again on another day.
Rotations were done on an individual basis as opposed to units, so the espirit de corps was lacking.
It doesn't make for a pretty picture when the first in country picture is body bags being loaded on the aircraft you arrive on.
at 09:26 on August 22nd, 2009
Thanks for your military insight ACP!
"There were several Generals doing overwatch in helicopters and did nothing, but they chose to go after the lowest common denominator." Yes! A cluster you know what! Guys like Calley will probably never live it down and die miserable and broken. Much of the brass doesn't seem to have that problem though . . . .
at 09:36 on August 22nd, 2009
For some reason the brass never seems to feel responsible. I always thought if you saw a wrongdoing and did nothing, you were condoning it. I guess this one was just too big and the word got out, so something had to be done. Why not Lt Calley? Just a Lt, to me a Lt has always been an intern.
at 16:50 on August 22nd, 2009
Orders are only carried out without questions by disciplined soldiers that have been indoctrinated to do so. I really think this is a case of indoctrination that all Vietnamese where the enemy and helped the enemy. The operation seemingly was in place to denigh the enemy bolt holes to hide and mingle locally. The indoctrination built on the hate of the vicousness of the enemy came into play big time it must of been real heavy hatred for soldiers to carry out such a murderous calous act and following a set of orders that gave vent to their anger.
This is not a case of a disipline at the lower rank end its a case of bad leadership and a lack of control by generals and commanders. Morals were sent to the wind, the forces on the ground were ordered to vent their hate on innocent people on a very complicated battle ground, complicated because they lived there. It was hard to tell who was enemy and who was not.right on the door step of military encampments.
I still feel that I could never be indoctrined that way, perhaps thats because I come from a culture and had an upbringing that allows me to think clearly and morally and served in an army where such an order would have been questioned as being immoral and wrong before it even was issued to the men on the ground. Within that army war crimes have happened but in modern times by small groups working on their own intentions.
at 08:01 on August 22nd, 2009
This was tragic and I in no way defend what he did but he was the only one convicted and that is a travesty of justice.
If this happened as presented in court his superiors and subornates also should have been convicted.
at 08:04 on August 22nd, 2009
Abu Graib is another example of the lower ranks getting nailed and the officers getting off. Where was the supervision there. Did these troops not have platoon, company commanders. What about the Brigadier General that commanded the prison? It seems to me the buck stops with the Commander on he ground.
at 10:51 on August 22nd, 2009
You forget, Babel - they murdered innocent men, too.
at 15:40 on August 22nd, 2009
No I did not forget I just did not mention the men, the elderly and the infirmed, the women and children mentioned put my point over clearly about how cowardly this tragic war crime was. But thanks for mentioning them as we really should not forget anyone murdered so cruelly.
at 10:54 on August 22nd, 2009
Not just in the military, but it seems that everywhere I have worked, almost without exception, that same elite vs non-elite attitude prevails.
That is because narcissism is the most un-overcome aspect of human nature.
I worked with a man who suffered post-traumatic stress syndrome from his Vietnam war experience. While drunk, he told me the story of finding and cooking some eggs with his friend. Hours later, his friend was dead of a wound to his abdomen, and my friend got to look at those eggs.
He had other tales, tales such as his friend being offered a drink in a village and the water being laced with cut glass.
Just last week, I went to meet my wife on a break at the place where she gets her nails done. The owner is a Vietnamese woman who was a refugee from Vietnam. She told me her story in difficult to understand English of her escape to Cambodia (still free at that point) and her eventual escape to the US.
When I was in Italy, the Italians on the left had trouble with the movie, "The Deer Hunter", for its graphic depiction of torture done by North Vietnamese regulars to American prisoners.
It is as if you can depend on two things in war, my guess, not having been in one, and those two things would be that there were atrocities on both sides and there were people, partisan to one side or the other, who couldn't believe that their side had done such things.
Maybe because as a kid growing up, my mother told me stories of atrocities on both sides in WWII in her town, I find it believable.
One of the best things about "Saving Private Ryan" was the honest depiction of out-of-control US soldiers killing Germans who had surrendered or, for me, the best one, the cry of "let them burn" as the Germans came out, burning, from their bunkers.
at 11:43 on August 22nd, 2009
If the same military standards, as exist nowadays, applied to G.I.s in WWII, a substantial number of them would have been prosecuted and convicted of "war crimes". Things have changed during and since the Vietnam War and nowadays we fight wars in a more civilized and humanitarian manner, always aware of the political ramifications and the maintenance of our military careers and potential job offers once we leave the military. i.e., we selectively kill as opposed to indiscriminately killing because we don't want to ruffle the media's and the politician's feathers and we want to keep our resumes squeaky clean . . . .
at 11:45 on August 22nd, 2009
Good points, Rory. Easy to understand, "let them burn".
at 12:04 on August 22nd, 2009
Roy: That was a memorable line in Saving Private Ryan wasn't it?
"Look . . .I washed for dinner!"
"I love America!"
'F__k Hitler!'
"Momma . . . momma . . . ."
"I'm okay . . . I just got the wind knocked out of me."