Vimy Ridge, the True Birth of a Nation

by Piobar | February 9, 2011 at 09:04 am
871 views | 2 Recommendations | 6 comments


On a snowy morning, in early April, out in the French countryside, a nation was born. Although most Historians have argued the nation of Canada was born 1 July 1867, through the work of the estimable Sir John A. MacDonald, this is simply not the case. The unified, bilingual nation that is now Canada was forged in the fire of the Western Front. It started with the movement of troops in late December and early January, and from there blossomed into a proud sense of National identity.



The Dominion of Canada, a small, insignificant colony of the British Empire, entered into the Great War as anything but a nation. The United Kingdom was at war, and her colonies were going to help, no consultation or consent required. The mother country called out, and her sons around the world were expected to answer. That all changed that snowy morning, 9 April, 1917, at a little place called Vimy Ridge. Vimy, it is a name that should be burned into the collective consciousness of every Canadian, a part of our Nation half a world away. The mighty British army tried, and failed, to take that key position from the German army. The French, too, had tried, and been sent back, with their tails between their legs. Canada stepped up, a rag-tag band of farm-boys, lumberjacks, fisherman, and other ‘colonials.’ These were citizen soldiers, not a hardened army of veterans. Failure was expected. Fighting for the first time as a unified force, Canada’s young army rose up out of obscurity, and earned the right to be an independent Nation. It was the bloodletting at Vimy Ridge, the victory no one thought possible, that earned Canada the right to sit at the Paris Peace Conferences, be a signatory at the Treaty of Versailles. It was though this battle, where the quiet, unimportant colony did that which the great Empires of France and Great Britain failed to do, which proved to the world that Canada was ready for true self governance. That snowy Easter morning, our nation was truly born. It was there that Canada stood up, unhooked the yolk of British rule and announced its place in world affairs. And we owe the men who bled the ground red a great debt. We should remember them.



As a Dominion, we had “responsible government” but no real autonomy. While it can be argued that we were a nation before the battle of Vimy ridge, it is clearly not the case. Because we were merely a Dominion of the British crown, we still had to defer to the British Parliament, and the House of Lords, to manage our own affairs. We were still a colony. The British North America act gave the authority to manage our own affairs, to some extent. Of this there can be little argument; but how far did this go? An Austrian Arch-Duke is assassinated and before anyone knows what is happening, an entire generation of young men is being sent to the slaughter. Did Canada’s Parliament have any say? Were Canadians affected or threatened in any direct way? No; but still our young men marched off to war. In 1914, did Canada declare war? Did we even have that option? As with the Boer war, or the War of 1812, and all the others, when Britain entered the Great War, we were a part of it, directly or not. Why did our young men join up? Why did they willingly put themselves at risk, in a nation that many had never even seen, and to which they had little or no connection? Nationalism? Maybe, but we were not a nation yet. A sense of duty, and honour, tempered by a love of their dominion, which called upon them, as a part of its duty to the mother country, brought men and boys, Anglo and Francophone alike, to those recruiting offices. Canada had an army, barely, at this point. They went over seas and fought, however, as part of the British Expeditionary Force. The Canadian army did not have the right, in 1914, to fight as a unified division, as a National army. The regiments from Canada were part of Lord Kitchener’s great “plug and play” military. Companies and regiments from Canada were fed into British units and divisions, to fill gaps in the British Army. They had never, until Vimy, been given the right, or the dignity, of fighting side by side. That day, 9 April 1917, the Canadian Corps formed up, and under withering fire, took what was seen as and impregnable defensive work; the key position in the German line.



Through this engagement, Canada was seen internationally, to have come of age. When the war ended, of all the colonial states that were involved in the conflict, our nation was deemed ready to take part in the negotiations; Newfoundland, Australia, South Africa, and others, were present only as “dominions of the British Empire” with no voice of their own. Canada was their, as a partner, albeit a small partner, but with a voice of her own for the first time, having independent representation in world affairs. What our four Canadian divisions did that day, wrought a nation with mud, blood, iron, sweat, and tears. The Canadian Corps, four divisions strong, rose up out of obscurity, having developed new methods of fighting that are now used world wide, including a more hands on approach to leadership, working in smaller groups than any army prior, with every soldier knowing his role, and those of his immediate superiors, so that in the face of huge casualties, the assault could go on. The perfection of the creeping barrage, a trick developed earlier but never fully perfected prior, was demonstrated, having been extensively rehearsed. The operation was Canadian planned, perfected, and performed. The effectiveness of the Canadian troops was obvious. The German line wired in at the beginning of the battle that they were under assault from hand picked shock troops. Our fledgling nation did what no one else could, and our methods were adopted world-wide. Many of them, including the development of what have become known as sections or squads, the effective use of rolling Artillery barrages, the reintroduction of “fire and movement” and the communication of all levels of leadership to ensure that everyone knows what to do, are still key practices of militaries in all the great nations of the world today. We not only carved out our place in the world, we reshaped it in our image. This was a defining moment in world history, and it was our moment!



This was not merely an “Anglophone” victory, as some might claim. The WASP population were not the only troops on the ground, and despite what certain politically motivated historians or educators blinded by the “politically correct” movement may tell us. We are taught from a young age not of the great victories, the bravery, of the Canadian Army on the Western Front. Indeed, for the most part, until college or university the only discussion of the First World War that young Canadians are exposed to are a few brief mentions of the home front, and of the conflict between French and English Canada. The claim is that French Canadians felt no loyalty to either Britain or to France, and were unified in their opposition to Canada’s involvement in the war. This is all part of the movement to rewrite Canadian History to create evidence for the Quebecois Nationalist movement. However, the records from the period tell a different story, one which, for the sake of being “politically correct” has been white-washed out of our national heritage. At the outbreak of war in 1914, Canada did not have the logistics to accept the huge number of would be soldiers who flooded the recruiting stations across the nation. One of the main reasons was the fact that, until that point, the Canadian Military was an Anglophonic entity. Special Francophone regiments were formed, as a result of the overwhelming number of young French Canadian men who wanted to do their part, some because they felt a tie to either France or Britain, others because they felt the growing sense of pride in the burgeoning colony in which they were born. Some felt that the aggression of the German Empire was unjust and needed to be stopped, and still more, politics aside, were looking for adventure and glory. Whatever their justification, the number of young French speakers who sought to join up, many of whom fought and died in the conflict, prove that the victory at Vimy was not an “English” victory, but a pan-Canadian one, a unifying moment in our collective national history, which has been forgotten on all sides.



By 1939, things had changed. When Britain declared war on Germany again, a pathetic twenty-one years after the “War to end all wars” were Canadian boys automatically called upon to do or die for Mother England? No. The government of Canada finally had the right to decide for itself. What had changed? Where did this new found sovereignty come from? It was forged from the mud, blood, and bullets at Vimy Ridge. Why then, less than a century later, is this shining moment in our shared history so unsung? Do students in our schools read of the heroic deeds of their forefathers, fighting over seas for freedom and justice? No, they do not. The majority of Canadians do not have an inkling of these events, and how key they are to the birth of our nation. It is time that we change this. It is time to remember. Ninety-six years ago today, young men from across Canada, were moving throughout the Western front towards a single location; a place the name of which should be burned into the minds of all of us who have come since. United for the first time, men from throughout the Dominion of Canada bonded together. The stirring of a National identity, a pride in a nation that, technically, did not yet exist, began. They fought and died for us, a generation butchered for our freedom. We should remember their sacrifices, with pride. This 9 April, when you are sitting down to a drink after work, or pausing over your evening meals, take a moment to reflect on that day, the horror, the valour, and be proud of our country. Remember. One hour every November is not enough. They fought and died for our freedom, our independence and status as a nation won through their sacrifice. We should remember and honour them every day, particularly on the day that Canada was truly born. Vimy Day is not a statutory holiday, perhaps it should be. Nevertheless, take a few minutes to remember. Raise a glass to those who fell. They fought and died for us. Every 11th of November, we say the words "at the going down of the sun, and in the morning, we will remember them." Lets keep that promise


Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
steffanileman

We are officially still a Dominion, though, with no formal declaration of independence, and a conglomerate of semi-autonomous units called provinces. The only semblance of an independence was when Trudeau repatriated the colonial constitution from Britain. Provincial oligarchies fought hard to win concessions so they would exploit the colonials in the name of the Queen. In my opinion Trudeau was the first leader that tried to unite the French and English and immigrants under a sense of national identity and sovereignty as a nation from coast to coast, and he may be the first founding father of Canada, but he failed against entrenched regional interests. I don't think Canada will be a real sovereign nation until it declares a Republic of Canada and rewrites its constitution.

0
Piobar

We have officially been a sovereign nation, with a shared monarch, since 1931. The statute of <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 />Westminster officially granted freedom to the "dominions" to a degree to be set by their own governments. One of the main justifications used to bring this about was the major part that Canada had played on the Western Front, demonstrating our nation had "come of age." As such, technically Canada has not been a dominion for about the last eighty years, and while it is true that the complete transfer of control was not instantaneous, the main areas which were left under British control were judicial, and only remained so at the discretion of the former colonies themselves; the running of the country, and matters of sovereignty, such as the ability to declare war for ourselves, were granted to Canada back in 1931. As for Trudeau, I have mixed feelings. Based on the damage he did to the Canadian military, one could argue that he did more damage to our sovereignty than good. Following the Trudeau era, Canada became more reliant on the US for protection than ever before....

1
steffanileman

I know Albertans hated Trudeau, but I thought it was over oil and Petrocan, I didn't know about the military. I think it's a blessing that the U.S. protected Canada during the Cold War, which was the only time the country faced a military threat. Look at countries that spend 20-40 percent of their budgets on the military while their people live in poverty. Soviet Union collapsed over that, and the U.S. isn't doing great either. Canadians want that money spent on social services, while Americans would rather spend on weapons. As the grandson of a sabre-rattling cavalry officer I have great love and respect for the military, but Canada's strength is in peacemaking, not dying for somebody else's military adventures abroad. Rejection by the Security Council should be a lesson for Ottawa, and Canada should do what it does best...

1
Piobar

Albertans are not the only ones with a beef against Trudeau, I am a proud BC boy, I'm only in Alberta because I was transfered by work, but I found him to be an arrogant jack-ass... not that he was the first, or the last, politician in this country who fits that description. You are right about Canada's strength at Peace-making, when, that is, Ottawa is willing to let the soldiers do their jobs; sadly, bureaucrats in high places, and MPs with no stomach are often opposed to letting Canadian soldiers actually soldier. And I agree, hopefully the government will take notice of all the debacles of the last year, most of which can be tied to supporting Air Canada, more than anything else. The UAE kicked Canadian Soldiers out of Camp Mirage, and campaigned against Canada at the UN because Air Canada petitioned the government against letting other companies increase the number of clights between Canada and the Arab Emirates... a Canadian company that cannot stay afloat without a government backed pseudo-monopoly, cost Canada a seat on the Security Council for the first time in history... that is not what the men this artical is about died for, and it is not what the Canadian Forces of today put their lives on the line to protect... its time our politicians woke up!

0
steffanileman

Air Canada is a crown corporation in drag, it has never changed since I started in the travel business many moons ago, and it has the weight of Quebec's nepotism and ex Liberal ministers behind it. At AC it's who you know not what you can do that counts, and they've been blessed with Lufthansa's partnership as well as Wall Street's money. On the other hand, airline business is extremely competitive and low profit, and I'd do the same if a rich competitor tried to move into my territory. Emirates doesn't offer anything of value in return for expanding into Western Canada, and I think it was dirty of the UAE to blackmail Ottawa instead of lobbying properly and patiently.

0
Piobar

I agree, but I still think that Air Canada should be able to stand on its own without being bailed out at every turn... the worst part was, after the UAE admitted to campaigning against Canada, and said it was over Air Canada's monopoly on flights, Air Canada was in the news again, for letting a man wearing a mask get onto a flight he was not booked for, with no actual ID, let alone a passport.... They make our country look bad around the world, and the Government still props them up. I support Crown Corportations, to some extent, but they should earn their keep....

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

steffanileman
First Flagged at 11:32 AM, Feb 9, 2011 by steffanileman
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from