Vision Vancouver's Eleanor Gregory 'Pulls a Sarah Palin' by Using Private Email to Conduct Potentially Explosive Gov't Business

by jr | November 3, 2008 at 02:52 pm
292 views | 0 Recommendations | 5 comments

Photos

Vision Vancouver's Eleanor Gregory 'Pulls a Sarah Palin' by Using Private Email to Conduct Potentially Explosive Gov't Business

Vision Vancouver's Eleanor Gregory 'Pulls a Sarah Palin' by Using Private Email to Conduct Potentially Explosive Gov't Business

see larger image

uploaded by jr

When it comes to conducting government business on her private email account, rather than on her official government account that would put the email on public record, Vision Vancouver’s Eleanor Gregory is beginning to look as much like Sarah Palin as Tina Fey.

Just as hackers exposed Palin for conducting business as Alaska’s governor on her private Yahoo account, Gregory, an elected Vancouver School Board trustee, has been exposed for using her private email account for communication on a potentially explosive government issue.

Gregory has a government email address, eleanor.gregory@vsb.bc., which she gives out publicly. Yet when Gregory was contacted at that government address by a victim of alleged illegal “political psychiatry” at the VSB — Canadians Opposing Political Psychiatry have identified the VSB as practicing Soviet-style political psychiatry and “as an absolute last resort” organized an International Boycott of Vancouver School Board Diplomas — Gregory immediately switched to her private email account egregory@gregoryandgregory to respond. “That’s the email of the law firm she runs, I think with her husband,” says the alleged victim. “But that firm isn’t involved in this case.”

Criticism directed at Palin for using a private email account to perform business in her role as Alaska governor could also apply to Gregory in her role as an elected VSB trustee: “E-mail that’s public business ought to be done on public accounts that can become public record”, Charles Davis, executive director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition in the U.S., told Alaska’s Juneau Empire newspaper during the furor over Palin’s private email.

Not only Gregory’s switch to a private email account but the content of email she sent through that private account – the content will be examined in a separate article – led the alleged victim to conclude that Gregory was not acting in good faith.

Just as Palin’s conduct reflects on Presidential candidate John McCain who endorsed her, Gregory’s conduct reflects on Vancouver mayoral candidate Gregor Robertson who has been praising her on his campaign website. Robertson presented Gregory to the public as his ally, even after she was exposed for having done nothing as a trustee to ensure a criminal investigation into the practice of political psychiatry at the VSB, political psychiatry which evidence suggests was intended to deter freedom of information requests and election campaigning about VSB mishandling of bullying complaints. Robertson and his Vision Vancouver party face an election in two weeks.

A press release from Robertson’s campaign office quotes Gregory as saying that her “priority is to do what I can to assist his campaign.” It may be assistance he can do without.

This is an abbreviated version of an article published on the Downtown Eastside Enquirer

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
eastvanray

I fail to see the problem here.

0
jr

eastvanray,


As was pointed out in the post, government business has to be performed using public accounts, not private email accounts so that it is a matter of public record.  That way if there's an investigation, if emails are being accessed under the Freedom of Information & Protection of Privacy Act or subpoenaed, they're available.  When emails are sent using a private account, there is no accountability because who knows they even exist?

Using a private email account for government business also expands potential for breaches of confidentiality.  B.C. has a Protection of Privacy Act that government officials and staff are expected to abide by.  In the case of Eleanor Gregory discussing a woman's complaint to the Vancouver School Board on her personal email at Gregory & Gregory, the woman has no way of knowing who else may have access to that communication.  Does the secretary at Gregory & Gregory have access? Does Gregory's husband (she reportedly partners that law firm with her husband, although that has not been confirmed)?

Confidentiality is a particularly important issue in this case as there is evidence that the VSB had encouraged the creation of smear against the complainant after receiving a letter stating that she would be election campaigning about their "duplicity" in the handling of bullying complaints.  Due to the amount of libel in the file, the woman had specifically instructed the School Board in writing to take extra precautions to ensure confidentiality. (Those instructions are discussed in the complete version of the article on the Downtown Eastside Enquirer blogspot, linked to at the end of the post.)

0
eastvanray

That is what we call "mice nuts"....something very small and insignificant.

0
jr


This is a case in which there is documented evidence of criminal activity inside the Vancouver School Board.  And Vision's Eleanor Gregory made a point of going off public record to communicate about it.   Not "small" at all.
 


0
eastvanray

Would this be an issue if she had communicated in person?  Where no record at all would have been generated?  Are trustees forbidden from speaking without a transcriber?

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from