Voter Intimidation Alive And Well In America

by Rory Cripps | September 12, 2009 at 12:41 pm
196 views | 24 Recommendations | 2 comments

Videos

Black Panthers Intimidate Voters in Philadelphia

see larger video

sourced by Rory Cripps

Black Panthers Intimidate Voters in Philadelphia

One would think that voter intimidation in America died out long ago. Not so!

America has had a long history of voter intimidation. For example: Whites in the South, backed up by the noose of the KKK and the strong arm of the local Sheriff (who was more often than not a Klan member) used it against Blacks for decades. And Ward bosses in cities such as New York and Chicago, backed up by the Mafia  and local rent-a-thugs,  used it for decades against Whites and various ethnic groups that were inclined to vote a certain way. And America's inner-city Gang Bangers, in cities such as L.A., use it against anyone that poses an inconvenience to their drug trade and who goes out on a limb by attempting to clean up the neighborhood, as it were.

Voter intimidation, which is always accomplished through implicit and explicit threats of violence, accompanied, at times, by actual demonstrations of violence, is wrong and needs to be taken seriously by not only law enforcement but by the American public.

There have been a number of national U.S. elections whose outcomes could have quite possibly turned out to be the opposite had voter intimidation (and consequent voter fraud) not occurred. The Nixon/JFK election (1960) is a case in point. However, in those days, political parties and politicians were not as quick to dispute election results as they are nowadays. 

American's unimpeded right to vote (and the "free speech" that their vote implies) makes all the difference in determining whether or not Americans live in a free society or a closed society. Indeed, one single vote can determine the outcome of a presidential election and therefore the course of the nation.

The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility has begun an official inquiry into the dismissal in May of a civil complaint against the New Black Panther Party and two of its members who disrupted a Philadelphia polling place during the November general elections.

The inquiry is disclosed in an Aug. 28 letter to Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee who first raised questions about the dismissal in May and asked unsuccessfully that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. make available the head of the department's Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division for a closed-door briefing on the decision.

"I am pleased that someone at the Justice Department is finally taking the dismissal of the New Black Panther Party case seriously," Mr. Smith said Wednesday. "The Justice Department's decision to drop a case against political allies who allegedly intimidated voters on Election Day 2008 reeks of political interference."

Mr. Smith said the department's refusal to provide Congress with an explanation for the dismissal "only further raises concerns that political favoritism played a role in this case."

In January, the Justice Department filed a civil complaint in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia against the New Black Panther Party, claiming two of its members in black berets, black combat boots, black shirts and black jackets with military insignias intimidated voters with racial insults, slurs and a nightstick. A third party member was accused of managing, directing and endorsing their behavior.

The complaint said two New Black Panthers engaged in "coercion, threats and intimidation racial threats and insults menacing and intimidating gestures and movements directed at individuals who were present to vote." It said that unless prohibited by court sanctions, they would continue to direct intimidation, threats and coercion at voters and potential voters "by again deploying uniformed and armed members at the entrance to polling locations in future elections, both in Philadelphia and throughout the country."

The original incident was captured on videotape and gained national attention after the video was distributed on YouTube.

The Times first reported the decision to dismiss the complaint in May and later reported that Associate Attorney General Thomas J. Perrelli, the department's No. 3 political appointee, had approved the decision even after the government had won judgments against the New Black Panthers for their actions.

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights also has demanded that the Justice Department explain the dismissal, saying a previous response "paints the department in a poor light."

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Rory Cripps

SARA: HA! YES! It's about as confidential as your and my credit report and public records!  I'll say this though in all seriousness: When it comes to national elections in America the outcome corresponds to the vote. I say this because a  few years ago I, personally, ran some statistics and did an extensive regression  analysis to see if the powers that be were in the ball park with the election numbers. Unless my input (i.e. the X variables of which there were about 15) was FUBAR, as a result of evil doers engaged in a massive conspiracy to skew the election data, I'm comfortable with the conclusion that the outcome of U.S. presidential elections conforms to the American voter's will and that the elections are righteous. 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
First Flagged at 3:49 PM, Sep 12, 2009 by Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (24)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from