NP Rank:
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 Ended the Use of Literacy Tests
Before President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law the Voting Rights Act of 1965, during his speech on August 6, 1965, he stated:
His words addressed what had been an obstacle to the participation of millions of so called Negroes (Black people) in the United States as full citizens, the descendants of Africans brought to the New World to be enslaved and who were later grandfathered into the nation as American citizens.
Until the signing of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, many Americans of African descent had been denied the right to vote by a carefully orchestrated campaign, first used in the state of Mississippi in 1890, to prevent their influence in the American political system for 75 years, primarily through the use of the poll tax and literacy tests. These strategies were later adopted throughout the southern United States as a means to deny Black people the right to vote.
On occasion, any form of arbitrary testing would suffice, like asking the prospective voter to guess the exact number of marbles in a jar on display at the voting place.
The majority of the provisions in the bill are permanent but sections of the Voting Rights Act, primarily related to the southern states of the United States, must be renewed and extended.
The non permanent provisions of the bill were extended in 1970, 1975, with a 25 year extension signed in 1982. Despite the efforts of conservative House Republicans to delay the bill’s signing, the bill passed in the House, 390-33 and in the Senate, 98-0, with President George W. Bush signing the fourth Voting Rights Act extension on July 27, 2006.
The signing of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the four extensions of the act have occurred during my lifetime.
On Thursday, February 4, 2010, almost 45 years after the signing of the Voting Rights Act that abolished the use of poll taxes and literacy tests, as he addressed a crowd of 600 attendees of the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville, Tennessee, former Republican Congressman of Colorado Tom Tancredo shared his beliefs with the crowd.
He mused that, by not requiring a civic literacy test before voting, to his way of thinking that may have been the reason why a “committed, socialist ideologue” named Barack Hussein Obama was elected to the White House.
After his speech on Thursday, February 4, 2010, using Twitter on Saturday, February 6, 2010 and displayed on Mr. Tancredo’s webpage, he tweeted “…. in Nashville I called for a CIVIC LITERACY test.”
Tom Tancredo has based his political career on being anti immigration, both legal and illegal. In addition to a call for tougher policies to combat illegal immigration, he has also called for a moratorium or freeze on legal immigration.He has voiced his belief that immigration and the resultant “cult of multiculturalism” and what he calls a “siren song of multiculturalism”, represent a danger to America.
During his campaign for president of the United States in 2008, Mr. Tancredo’s positions on immigration were heralded by Gordon Baum, the leader of the nativist, White nationalist organization the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC).
The Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC) was formed from the remnants of the membership of the former White’s only Citizens’ Councils (This link contains an article written in 1956) that began forming throughout the southern United States in 1956 as a means to thwart societal changes occurring, beginning with the Brown v the Board of Education ruling, striking down the notion of segregated ‘separate but equal’ educational accommodations for Black and White students.
The notion of ‘separate but equal’ schooling had been previously ruled constitutional by the United States Supreme Court in 1896, when it rendered its decision in Plessy v Ferguson regarding the laws enacted in the school system in the state of Louisiana. That ruling led the way for similar implementation of discriminatory practices regarding educational opportunities for Black students across the United States.
On opening night of the National Tea Party Convention on Thursday, February 4, 2010, in Nashville Tennessee, almost 45 years after the signing of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, when Tom Tancredo stood before a laughing, applauding audience, musing about a civic literacy test not being in use during the 2008 presidential election, he was inviting his audience to travel with him backward in time.
Also at NowPublic :
Tea Party Opening Address: Tancredo Laments Lack of Literacy Test
Religious Extremism and U.S. Politics: Often an Ominous Pairing
Crowd Power
-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Recommendations (101)
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Roberto Alvarez-Galloso
Miami, Florida, United States -
Pat Garcia
La Paz, Mexico -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Albert Milliron
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
-
karenfish
Los Angeles, California, United States -
Rosie
Boston, Massachusetts, United States -
cassy82
Miami, Florida, United States -
Mary Richard
Toronto, Canada -
harringtola
Town-send, Massachusetts, United States














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (22)
at 12:25 on February 9th, 2010
Good reminder
at 12:28 on February 9th, 2010
Thank you, Jim.
at 12:30 on February 9th, 2010
What is America if it is not multicultural ? A little too materialistic in my view, but then so is the UK and most of the world, albeit to a lesser degree than the USA and UK. If any ethnic group would lose voters based on a literary test is it not about time that the education system is improved in the land of the free ?
at 12:53 on February 9th, 2010
Sputnic, the main feature of the literacy tests of the pre-Voting Rights Act era was the tests were purely subjective, often asking questions of those attempting to vote that may have stumped constitutional scholars.
The problem had little to do with the education of the persons trying to vote. The questions were designed, in the case of the Black voters, for them not to pass the test.
Even in instances where college educated Black people showed up to vote, with some acing the test, there was some contrivance put in the way to prevent them voting.
There have been elements in American society that have been proclaiming from the highest soapbox, pulpit, podium, in whatever venue they can obtain, that the America, envisioned by the founding fathers in 1776, has been lost. This outcry has gone on for over 20 years.
If one considers only the Naturalization Act of 1790, enacted 14 years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, an act which did not allow any non-White immigrants to become citizens then, the proclamations of those elements have their validity.
That restriction remained in effect until 1952.
at 12:59 on February 9th, 2010
Thank you very much for the history lesson Karen. I heard similar tactics were used in the development of the first IQ tests.
at 13:03 on February 9th, 2010
Sputnic, the IQ tests are a whole 'nother kettle of fish, as they say!
at 16:46 on February 9th, 2010
Tom Tancredo is a far right extremist in some issues. Anyone that wants to bring back a poll tax or a literacy test to vote is not in the mainstream of either party. When our republic first started, it wasn't just blacks who were not allowed to vote, woman and non-property owners were not allowed either. poor folks across the board were not allowed to cast a vote. This is a problem for folks like me who are orginalists, some of the original intents were clearly wrong. Thankfully time have cleared up most of the inequality towards blacks, poor, and woman. Tom Tancredo doesn't deserve the time it took for you to write this article. I remember interviewing his campaign handler Bay Buchanan (Pat Buchanan's sister) They are all to be lumped in the same group.
at 16:57 on February 9th, 2010
As Tom Tancredo has been taking his show on the road for several years, to every venue he can, possibly influencing millions, Al, yes, this article was needed to lay out the history of the literacy tests that were used to oppress millions of Negroes/Blacks/African Americans, so it will be understood, at least by any who take the time to read here, what is the history associated with literacy tests, which were used for 75 years.
at 16:52 on February 9th, 2010
Good post Karen. The debate to make democracy more responsible and mature exist the world over.
I would personally see this literacy test with a very critical eye and most likely oppose it, especially in the US and based on its history.
However, we have to ask our self, how can we build a better democratic system and especially one that is more responsible and less prone to lobbyist or fashions and moods.
I some democracies Members of the Military are not allowed to vote, others have a restriction of people with a criminal record, age is also used and in some cases or rather places a minimum of education is required as well. People with mental illnesses are also been excluded in many countries. In some part one has to be a resident for at least 25 years and this with a clean police record before they are allowed to vote.
What is fair? What is democratic? And what is wisest or best for society?
at 16:59 on February 9th, 2010
Thank you, Uwe, for your thoughts.
at 17:02 on February 9th, 2010
This particular debate is directed at the Hispanic and to keep them from voting. at least that is my impression, especially after washing the video.
Such a test would only be acceptable if uniform for all voters and translated into all the minorities languishes in the US, including the First Nations languishes.
at 17:19 on February 9th, 2010
Well, Uwe, this latest attempt to resurrect the literacy test has been aimed at undocumented workers, which is basically a code word for those believed to be entering the U.S. by 'coming across the border', from the south.
But, it is meant to address the issue of immigrants period, based on the freeze on all immigration that is being promoted by Tancredo
Given the positions postured by Tom Tancredo and those that support his views, theirs is also a concern that all immigrants are changing America in a way that displeases them, as I said, with multiculturalism seemingly being a dirty word.
at 18:54 on February 9th, 2010
I believe from what I read and saw so far that your statement is accurate Karen.
at 22:11 on February 9th, 2010
Thank you, Uwe.
at 17:47 on February 9th, 2010
Thank you for your interesting post. There should be no forms of literacy test or obstacles to voting.
at 18:28 on February 9th, 2010
You're welcome and thank you, AlvarezGalloso, for reading my post and sharing your thoughts, with which I happen to agree.
at 20:16 on February 9th, 2010
This is a great historical reflection for those of us old enough to remember and for those who are not, an education. Thank you for this factual accounting. One of the best reports I have read on Now Public.
at 22:02 on February 9th, 2010
I am deeply grateful for your praise, Harringtola.
at 09:35 on February 13th, 2010
Thank you for keepin "us" informed and the history behind this Voting Act.
at 14:25 on February 15th, 2010
My thanks to you, Ray.
at 20:11 on February 16th, 2010
Rosie, as yet, it is unclear the exact composition, makeup, even what apparatus might be used to advance the re-establishment of literacy tests.