NP Rank:
VP Dick Cheney's Office Suggested Waterboarding Iraqi Prisoner
by Karen Hatter | May 14, 2009 at 10:01 am
533 views | 48 Recommendations | 17 comments
Former producer and investigative reporter for NBC News, Robert Windrem, reports that two U.S. intelligence officials confirmed the office of Vice President Cheney suggested waterboarding one of Saddam Hussein's former intelligence officers.
From the Daily Beast :
In his new book, Hide and Seek: The Search for Truth in Iraq, and in an interview with The Daily Beast, Duelfer says he heard from “some in Washington at very senior levels (not in the CIA),” who thought Khudayr’s interrogation had been “too gentle” and suggested another route, one that they believed has proven effective elsewhere. “They asked if enhanced measures, such as waterboarding, should be used,” Duelfer writes. “The executive authorities addressing those measures made clear that such techniques could legally be applied only to terrorism cases, and our debriefings were not as yet terrorism-related. The debriefings were just debriefings, even for this creature.”
Click here to read the Daily Beast article.
Advertisement
NowPublic on Facebook
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
First Flagged at 10:25 AM, May 14, 2009 by Jarrett Martineau
These members have powered this story:-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
firestormcs
Fort Walton Beach, Florida, United States
Recommendations (48)
-
Sputnic
London, United Kingdom -
Jarrett Martineau
Vancouver, Canada 
Anonymous users (2)
-
Emezie
Bladensburg, Maryland, United States -
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States -
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (17)
at 11:09 on May 14th, 2009
Didnt Dick also say in the year 2000 that in order to justify another war in Iraq, America needed another Pearl harbour ? I think he may well burn when he dies
at 12:05 on May 14th, 2009
Why am I not surprised...
at 13:29 on May 14th, 2009
If this report gave a name of a person it would be more believable.
It may be true but if so it should have been made public when it happened.
at 13:32 on May 14th, 2009
This article is pure crap, and frankly you should be embarrassed for linking to it.
Just sayin'
at 14:04 on May 14th, 2009
Cheney is probably the greatest American political figure of our generation. He fought a war for eight years against massive odds. They did it with the smallest casualty rate in modern history and did not destroy prosperity on the home front. When you consider what the AQ wanted to do, a few guys getting their surf boards out is the least of our worries. Walk tall troopers!
at 17:34 on May 14th, 2009
It should be only a matter of time before all that has occurred during the Bush administration, renaming prisoners of war detainees and enemy combatants to avoid affording them the treatment due them as prisoners of war, redefining torture and crafting policy to justify torturing prisoners held in U.S. custody, many who were disappeared and secreted away to unknown locations, is fully exposed.
The blatant disregard for U.S. and international law endangered all of America's citizens.
at 10:38 on May 15th, 2009
By the Geneva Convention, soldiers who fight out of uniform or commit atrocities such as murdering prisoners or indiscriminately targeting civilians may be sent before firing squads.
Complain all you want about "prisoners of war" being renamed as detainees. If they weren't wearing uniforms when they were captured, they ain't prisoners of war.
Under both American law and the Geneva Convention, American forces could have and probably should have shot these cowardly scum on sight.
at 18:20 on May 14th, 2009
Former President Cheney, appearing on Face the Nation on May 10, 2009, as former Secretary of State Rice has done previously, implicated former President Bush in authorizing torture as well.
An excerpt from the above linked transcript of the Face the Nation interview with Dick Cheney:
SCHIEFFER: How much did President Bush know specifically about the methods that were being used?
We know that you-- and you have said-- that you approved this...
CHENEY: Right.
SCHIEFFER: ... somewhere down the line. Did President Bush know everything you knew?
CHENEY: I certainly, yes, have every reason to believe he knew -- he knew a great deal about the program. He basically authorized it. I mean, this was a presidential-level decision. And the decision went to the president. He signed off on it.
at 18:38 on May 14th, 2009
What's your point Karen? It seems to me the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee signed off on it too. If they didn't, they certainly condoned it. These allegations back and forth across the isle are childish. What's needed here is an honest bipartisan debate, not a crucifiction of one party against the other.
You might note that President Obama has already backtracked on releasing military abuse pictures later on this months. The administration is also pondering what to do with the terriorists and are approaching Congress to hold some indefinitely without a trial.
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/administration-ponders-detaining-terror-suspects-indefinitely
I think the Obama Administration is finding out that this whole issue is a lot more complicated than signing and exucutive order. An old man once said Don't let common sense become so rare that it is mistaken for genius.
at 22:42 on May 14th, 2009
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
"President Obama and his thugs he brought to Washington will be the worst administration"
Well, i guess Americans should be in the position to pass that judgment at the end of President Obama and his "thugs" first 4 years or 8 years in office. However, we know that the last administration owns that title. Just a reminder; President Obama was elected into office to clean up the mess the last administration left the country in.
President W. Bush and VP Cheney inherited a healthy economy with surplus, a country at peace, and respected all over the world, No wars. I should not remind you QueensHart the condition they left the country at the end of their administration.
By the way if water boarding worked, how come OBL and his second in-command are still at large? Don't you think his where about should have been the first information they give up considering how important (dead or alive) they were to the administration.
at 11:18 on May 16th, 2009
Minor point of difference: As any 10th grader worth their mettle will tell you, Congress controls the purse strings, not the President.
Although some know-nothings may blame Bush for all that ails us, the fact is until 2006, the U.S. was doing quite well.
Until, that is, Democrats like Daschle, Pelosi, and Reid purposefully torpedoed the economy and did their damnedest to insure defeat in Iraq. For the D's, it's always been party before country, and all in the name of winning the Democratic majority.
Oh sure, it's convenient for the Anointed One and his sycophants to complain about the mess he inherited, however that mess was part of the Democrats plan.
Hope you enjoy that change you voted for, sucker.
at 06:22 on May 15th, 2009
Offering the argument that torture may have worked ignores the reality that torture is against the law, U.S. federal and international.
For months, while all of the torture was occurring, while the re-definition of prisoners of war and the rest occurred, the Bush administration boldly discussed it's belief that the Geneva Conventions were outdated and should not be followed and proceeded to ignore them.
Yet, as signators of the Conventions, unless the international laws had been re-written or changed, the Bush administration was bound to uphold them, as written into U.S. federal law.
Because the Bush administration presented a deluded dissertation on torture, attempting to pretend torture wasn't torture doesn't mean torture was not torture.
If America is to re-claim the assertion that it is a nation guided and ruled by laws, all efforts, using whatever may be at its disposal, must be used to dissect how the country plunged into illegal and immoral activity, as it pretended it could do so by enacting and using the Bush administration's contrived and convoluted view for rationalizing ignoring the law.
at 10:37 on May 15th, 2009
Soldiers who fight out of uniform or who commit atrocities such as killing prisoners or targeting civilians are not protected by the Geneva Convention.
You should read the treaty.
at 08:33 on May 15th, 2009
This is nothing but parlour room debate. Nice if you are in university and trying to get in with some hottie, but Cheney and Bush had to live in the real world after 9/11. I remember how paralysed and cowardly most of Congress was, and the British parliament and most European governments. Once they cried their crocodile tears over the dead, they spent the rest of the time sitting on their hands (and doing even, worse shovelling billions into various dodgy muslim groups). I put my security in Cheney's hands any day.
at 14:46 on May 15th, 2009
" I put my security in Cheney's hands any day."...
.The same Cheney under his watch 911 did happen! The same Cheney that instigated the invasion of a country that had NOTHING to do with 911, costing thousands of Americans and Iraqis lives. The same Cheney that said our soldiers will be greeted as liberators. Are you kidding me? Give me a break!
One more point; the reason we have not been attack since 911 is because instead of the terrorist coming to America to kill Americans, they have Americans on their soil for the picking. Unless you do not consider them Americans.
the claim by vp cheney that it was because of their polics there has been any major attack here since 911 the reason we have not been attack here is because instead of the terrorist coming to america to kill americans,
at 08:53 on May 15th, 2009
Torture is immoral, people under torture say what the interrogator wants to hear in order for the torture to stop. People have confessed to crimes they have not committed and twenty years later been released from prison - torture doesnt even work. Is torture permitted by God ? Cruel and unusual punishment is against the US constitution is it not ?
at 09:14 on May 15th, 2009
Getting heavy at times can and does work. It is up to a professional to make the decision as to when and how. Anybody who has served knows how to using various techniques to extract information and to control prisoners. The key point is that it is done by professionals who are accountable to a system. Flying planes into buildings is immoral, chopping women's heads off for adultary is immoral, executing gays is immoral, beating little children is immoral.