Wall Street Socialists vs 4 million homeowners

by Heritage | September 19, 2008 at 10:56 pm
794 views | 80 Recommendations | 21 comments

Photos

Wall Street Socialists vs 4 million homeowners

Wall Street Socialists vs 4 million homeowners

see larger image

uploaded by Heritage

"...immense interlocked, incestuous borrowing… that's what is bringing down the entire banking system."

AIG, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, IndyMac and Bear Stearns, bankrupt, nationalised, bought out or bailed out. These institutions, run by the world's "best and brightest", were

"...borrowing to take on the risk and borrowing again and borrowing again, 25 to 30 times the amount of capital. ... They had to basically back the borrowing that they were doing. ... There was no transparency to the Fed, to the SEC, to the Treasury,..."

In effect, they were gambling. Their high stakes game failed and many are being bailed out by American workers. The same companies that fought to have their taxes lowered are now relying on working American families to bail them out.

“AIG was acting not simply as an insurance company,”...“It was acting as a speculative investment bank/hedge fund, as was Bear Stearns, as was Lehman Brothers, as is what will become Bank of America/Merrill Lynch.

When one of those working American families defaults on their mortgage, are they bailed out? Would any government agency or bank ever consider bailing out a delinquent gambler?

The US government made a choice. That choice involved helping the big end of town to pay its gambling debt and left up to 4 million American taxpayers at risk of losing their homes. To add insult to injury, those who lose their homes, and their children, will be paying off the bankers’ debt for many decades to come.

There are alternatives to corporate bail outs. Although reading the mainstream media you could be made to think otherwise. The soulution below requires that billions be spent on homeowners/taxpayers, rather than those who have already been proven to be financially incompetent.

A better use of the money, says Michael Hudson, professor of economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, and an economic adviser to Rep. Dennis Kucinich, would be to “save these 4 million homeowners from defaulting and being kicked out of their houses. Now they’re going to be kicked out of the houses. The houses will be vacant. The cities are going to [lose] property taxes, they’re going to have to cut back local expenditures, local infrastructure. The economy is being sacrificed to pay the gamblers.

One last question, these financial institutions are run by individuals who graduate from the world’s most prestigious universities, our “best and brightest”. These events did not happen overnight. So, where are the whistle blowers?

recommend This comment thread is now closed
Daniel Neun
Daniel Neun
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 02:50 on September 20th, 2008

This whole thing seems to me like a meltdown of the whole economic system called capitalism. To prevent the bankruptcy of financial monopoly players the US Government and the Congress simply declare a subversion of economics and politics and the dipossession of 300 million Americans.

Because that´s what it means if you take their money, hundreds of billions of  Dollars, and give it to the  banks.

The USA have, indeed,  declared Wall Street socialism. In effect they have declared state capitalism.

0
Heritage

State capitalism indeed:

…state capitalism is a term that is used…to describe a system where the state is intervening in the markets to protect and advance interests of Big Business. This practice is in sharp contrast with the ideals of free market capitalism.

It seems the US is becoming more and more like China:


This term is also used…to describe a society wherein the productive forces are owned and run by the state in a capitalist way, even if such a state calls itself socialist.
Wino
Wino
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:18 on September 20th, 2008

Heritage, I like this story. It's good stuff. What is the average person going to get out of all of this?  Nothing I think. 

phoenixesrose
phoenixesrose
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:28 on September 20th, 2008

Heritage, I like this story. It's good stuff.

The sad thing is that the whistle blowers and reporters and things were and are out there - and have been since early 2002.  They kept screaming that there's a "real estate" bubble, that this was going to burst sometime, and take down the entire market.

The problem is that those who should have been listening - and looking into the issue - congress, the regulators, local and state governments - didn't want to.  Why? Because they are and remain controlled by "fat cats" who have tons of money, and made and are continuing to make money off of this.  They are part of the problem - and are figuring that we, the people who make less than 40,000 a year on average, are going to clean it up for them.  Why not?  After all, the Geo. Bush Administration supports the rich, the corporations, and the tax shelters abroad - that most people can't even figure how to put their paultry salaries into - the same administration / congress people - who don't have to collect social security, worry about healthcare, or most other things.

Once again, its a case where the rich get richer, the poor and middle class get poorer - and we're expected to "not" notice for all the stuff going on with the war. 

Americans, it's time for us to wake up, smell the coffee and tell these people ENOUGH ALREADY. You can't steal from peter to pay paul - then steal from paul to pay peter back and forth - because in the end, it will catch up with you - and in this case, it has.

Welcome to the "greater depression" of the century.

0
Heritage

Americans, it's time for us to wake up, smell the coffee and tell these people ENOUGH ALREADY.

In the end, the solution must come from below. The top down approach will only perpetuate the cycle.

SOLARLIFE
SOLARLIFE
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 03:42 on September 20th, 2008

Heritage, I like this story. It's good stuff. Investment banks US a gmbling casino, tolerated to bring the money in to finance US dept. Now, the grey players sucked the money to Caiman island, Dubai. The most famous: Bush family.  Carlyle group, the military business holding transferred to  Dubai, cleaned up from the Investor Ben Laden group.

Emilio Lizardo
Emilio Lizardo
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:10 on September 20th, 2008

I can understand everybody's disappointment, displeasure and even to some degree disbelief that things here have now reached the current state of affairs. A situation recently described by that venerable sage of all matters economic, Allen Greenspan as, 'the worst economic crisis in a century"...

But, IMHO there's nothing new at all about what is happening, and the measures being taken to bail out the rich and powerful should not be suprising to anybody with any sense of the way things work among animals in the forest and to a very great extent here in America as well.

It's the old law of the jungle now forced by circumstances out from the shadows into the full light of day - 'Might makes right!'

As I mentioned above, there's nothing new at all about this situation. Here's a citation which gives one example from nearly ( but not quite ) a century ago -

The Titanic Inquiry Project
At approximately 12 p.m. on April 10, 1912, the new Royal Mail Steamer Titanic, flagship of the White Star Line, cast off from Southampton, England, on her maiden voyage to New York ...

Steaming west from Queenstown, she carried 2,208 passengers and crew - an eclectic mixture of Edwardian society. From the affluent first class, the likes of Astor, Straus and Guggenheim, to the largely forgotten third class and crew, with names such as Kirkham, Sage and Ward - each with their own unique story to tell.

At 11:40 p.m. Frederick Fleet, one of the lookouts stationed in the crow's nest, noticed something in the distance. He rang the warning bell three times, signalling the bridge of an object directly ahead, and picked up the bridge-crow's-nest telephone. A terse exchange over the telephone effectively warned the bridge of the impending danger, however, the warning had come too late to avert a collision.

First Officer William Murdoch was entering the bridge from the starboard wing when the warning came and quickly ordered the ship's helm turned hard astarboard. He was hoping to maneuver Titanic's bow away from the danger, then attempt to work the stern around but the iceberg was too close. The ship brushed along a submerged spar of the iceberg along her starboard side, opening several varying sized holes along her length an inrush of water.

Thomas Andrews, the ship's designer from Harland and Wolff, informed Captain Smith that the pumps were incapable of keeping up with the amount of water entering the vessel and would only buy them some extra time. The crew began hastily uncovering and readying the lifeboats to evacuate the vessel. Being aware there was barely enough lifeboat accommodation for slightly more than half of those on board must have weighed heavily on the captain's mind.

At 2:20 a.m., two hours and forty minutes after the collision, the vessel broke in two and sank, taking with her over 1,500 lives.

They only had lifeboats for about half the passengers. And why ? Well, of course, because, 'neither God nor man could sink that ship.'

0
Heritage

But, IMHO there's nothing new at all about what is happening,

Couldn't agree more. We live in democracies. We have access to information, yet history repeats. In the end we are responsible, for not making those in power accountable.

0
djermano

My question is why they didn't bail out Enron? And if they did....it would have brought questions to the billions they doled out to the Taliban. I know that this bank grabbing bail-out has a lot to do with 911....and they are covering up tracks. Citigroup is a big time supporter of Enron....and for some reason they are the rescuers in this meltdown? It is clear to me Bernake and Paulson are mere puppets to Bush and the slimy CIA operatives that really have their sucking tongues in our veins......Why do they care....Blame poor people for not paying their mortgages......well they will pay when we sock it to their taxes base.....Just think if they were able to get Social Security involved in this financial rape job.  Now the Big Anti Government boys have become big pro Government Boys afterall....to bad they are the bad big Government hucksters......I think people should pull their money out of the banks and start their own banks, do no more selling on the stock market, and cut all ties to Republican organizations... Isolating the disease is important in order to stop its infection in the American body.

0
Paschen

Very Good question.

0
Emilio Lizardo

It looks like Enron's liabilities were only around 23 billion ... small potatoes, I guess.

I think AIG's situation is somewhat different than Enron's, in that it is critically entangled with that santified house of cards we call the Global Economy, where Enron was primarily a 'local phenomenon' in terms of its failure impacting only the Americans.

Timeline of Enron's downfall
On August 14, 2001, Jeffrey Skilling, the chief executive of Enron, a former energy consultant at McKinsey & Company who joined Enron in 1990, announced he was resigning his position after only six months. "[T]he reasons for leaving the business are personal," said Skilling at the time, "but I'd just as soon keep that private." Observers noted that in the months leading up to his exit, Skilling had sold at minimum 450,000 shares of Enron at a value of around $33 million (though he still owned over a million shares at the date of his departure). Nevertheless, Kenneth Lay, the chairman at Enron, reassured analysts by affirming that there was "[a]bsolutely no accounting issue, no trading issue, no reserve issue, no previously unknown problem issues" prompting the departure.

After the September 11, 2001 attacks, media attention shifted away from the company and its troubles; a little less than a month later Enron announced its intention to begin the process of shearing its lower-margin assets in favor of its core businesses of gas and electricity trading.

On October 22, 2001, the share price of Enron fell to $20.65, down $5.40 in one day, following the Securities and Exchange Commission's announcement that it was investigating several suspicious deals struck by Enron, pronouncing "some of the most opaque transactions with insiders ever seen".

"There is an appearance that you are hiding something"

A few days into November 2001 it became known that the Enron management had been aggressively pursuing new investment or an outright buyout. The efforts were reported to have been largely unsuccessful. Investor Warren Buffett was approached, but declined. Other overtures were made to prominent buyout firms such as Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, the Blackstone Group, and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, all apparently fruitless efforts.

On November 19, 2001 Enron disclosed to the public further evidence of its critical state of affairs. Most pressingly that the company was facing debt repayment obligations in the range of $9 billion by the end of 2002. Such debts were "vastly in excess" of its available cash.

On November 28, 2001, Enron's two worst outcomes came true. Dynegy Inc. unilaterally disengaged from the proposed acquisition of the company and Enron's credit rating fell to junk status. The company, having very little cash with which to run its business, let alone satisfy enormous debts, imploded. Its stock price fell to $0.61 at the end of the day's trading. "Enron is now shorthand for the perfect financial storm," wrote one editorial observer.

Enron was estimated to have about $23 billion in liabilities, both debt outstanding and guaranteed loans. Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase in particular appeared to have significant amounts to lose with Enron's fall. Additionally, many of Enron's major assets were pledged to lenders in order to secure loans, throwing into doubt what if anything unsecured creditors and eventually stockholders might receive in bankruptcy proceedings.

Enron's European operations filed for bankruptcy on November 30, 2001, and it sought Chapter 11 protection in the U.S. two days later on December 2. At the time, it was the biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history, and it cost 4,000 employees their jobs.

The day that Enron filed for bankruptcy, Enron's workers were told to pack up their belongings and were given 30 minutes to vacate the building.

djermano
djermano
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:27 on September 20th, 2008

Heritage, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Paschen
Paschen
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:32 on September 20th, 2008

Heritage, I like this story. It's good stuff.

anarkissed
anarkissed
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:07 on September 20th, 2008

Good ideas.  too bad it's not in the best interests of the govt leaders to follow through.  www.zeitgeistmovie.com


0
Heritage

Just got my hands on this film. Haven't watched it yet. Thanks

Karen Hatter
Karen Hatter
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 06:19 on September 20th, 2008

Heritage, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:00 on September 20th, 2008

Heritage, I like this story. It's good stuff.

asterix611
asterix611
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 07:10 on September 20th, 2008

Heritage, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Heritage

zichi, Daniel Neun, Wino, phoenixesrose, SOLARLIFE, Emilio Lizardo, djermano, Paschen, mettacara, anarkissed, Karen Hatter, Rhonda J Mangus and asterix611, thank you all for your support.

Heritage

panzerlawyer
panzerlawyer
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 09:15 on September 21st, 2008

Heritage, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Tina Kells

I'm sorry I missed this; I wasn't online over the weekend.  Great work!

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from