NP Rank:
War with FOX was a trick meant to distract us?
Huffington Post Journalist thinks Obama outfoxed us with Fox story:
"When a stage magician makes a flourish, causing a puff of smoke and a flash of light to appear, there's a reason for it. It is called "misdirection." It is meant to dazzle the audience with a shiny object, so that they don't notice what is going on elsewhere on the stage, or perhaps even in the magician's other hand. It is an effective technique, so effective that it is the basis for most stage magic tricks. And there's a huge story that's sucking up a lot of oxygen from the inside-the-Beltway media scene right now that seems to be tailor-made misdirection which has been tossed into the media shark tank in order to stir up a feeding frenzy. . .
The real head-scratcher for serious media-watchers right now is what the "war" between the White House and Fox News was meant to distract us from this week. " `~Chris Weigant, Huffington Post
Media journalist Chris Weigant of Huffington Post openly poses the question that has been on many minds lately (I know it was on mine): Why did the Obama White House stir up a faux war with FOX News at this particular moment? Obama is not stupid and certainly knew he would appear to be victimizing the news network. So what gives?
I would tend to agree with Weigant's main premise: That when a story such as the White House war with Fox news network comes along and distracts the heck out of everyone, you can be sure something else is going on behind the scenes.
Everyone is kept busy trying to defend the move on the part of Democrats, or to explain the reasons why one is siding with Fox on this one. Meanwhile, something else which should be talked about is not, because it is unfolding without anyone's knowledge. But what is it that is unfolding, unnoticed?
Chris Weigant thinks he knows the answer to that one:
The "war" itself is laughable, for a number of reasons. The first is that all presidents do this to one extent or another. Press access is not a constitutional right or anything, meaning that the White House is free to invite anyone it wants into the press room, and exclude anyone it wants. Secondly, it's not "unprecedented" in any way, shape, or form. White Houses criticize the press all the time, and sometimes kick them off official planes, or completely deny them access in retaliation for stories they've run. It happens all the time, from both Republican and Democratic presidents. Anyone who thinks differently just doesn't have all that good a memory.But the final reason why the whole thing is so ludicrous is calling Obama's White House "Nixonian" in its dealings with Fox News. This is laugh-out-loud funny, because Roger Ailes, the man who runs Fox News was Richard Nixon's media advisor during his first successful campaign for the White House, in 1968. So you've got the man who designed Nixon's press policies now being held up as the victim of (as conservative critics say) the same exact press policies being used against him. . .
. . . Which brings me back to the real point I'm trying to make here -- why did the White House choose this moment to pick a fight with Fox News? This wasn't a slip of the tongue by one person up there, it seems more like a concerted effort. So what are they trying to distract the media's attention from this particular week? Or, more ominously, why is the White House throwing such political red meat to their base at this particular time? Is it to distract progressives from something the White House is doing behind its back?
My guess (which could ultimately prove to be wrong, of course) is that this whole fake (but shiny... oh, so shiny!) distraction was waved in front of the media in order to give some elbow room to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid as they are doing the toughest work yet on healthcare reform legislation. That has been the real story of the week, even though it is mostly dueling rumors and leaks (so far). Obama showed a masterful ability to distract Republicans earlier this year, by pushing so many issues simultaneously that the Republicans couldn't react to all of them with sufficiently indignant rage, because there were just too many things for them to focus on. Rage diluted is rage denied, in other words.
You could even call it a variation on Ailes' "orchestra pit theory." In Roger Ailes' own words:
If you have two guys on a stage and one guy says, "I have a solution to the Middle East problem," and the other guy falls in the orchestra pit, who do you think is going to be on the evening news?
Providing a center-ring tiger fight for everyone in the Washington media circus to focus on has taken the spotlight off the closed-door negotiations which will ultimately decide what the healthcare reform bills from the House and Senate will look like. This is serious, serious horse-trading, and the last thing Pelosi and Reid need right now is screaming Republicans with nothing better to talk about. Hence, the Fox News tempest in a teapot was served up instead.
NowPublic on Facebook
Recommendations (44)
-
Spydermonkey
huntsville, Alabama, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Albert Milliron
Columbia, South Carolina, United States -
Babel-Fish
Negros Oriental, Philippines -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States
-
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke
Redwater, Alberta, Canada -
The_Cynic
Freddy Beach, Where the deer r, Canada


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (19)
at 07:29 on October 26th, 2009
Thanks for the story smk. Well done!
It's a plausible supposition. If true, it worked in buying some time not only for the Congress, but for the pending decisions on Afghanistan, which now will probably wait until the November election is over and counted.
at 07:29 on October 26th, 2009
He's got a point. Seemed this "war" with FOX came right as the Dems were physically locking the Republicans out of meetings.*pay no attention to the man behind the curtain*
at 09:02 on October 26th, 2009
Yep it make complete sense and equally kept Fox busy defending it self, lol
Obama may not have a wand but it looks like he knows how to use the magical art of deception.
at 09:33 on October 26th, 2009
I think you have graduated Political PR-101. Many issues are put out there to distract away from a larger goal. While writers are talking Fox vs WH for a week, The House and Senate are meeting behind closed doors on Healthcare. President Obama promised during his campaign that, all negotiations on Healthcare would be transparent and viewed by the public on C-Span
at 09:56 on October 26th, 2009
I think the reason he made this statement was to distance himself from the way Clinton handled their unsuccessful bid for health care reform legislation by excluding everyone from the debate including insurance companies, doctors, nurses, hospitals, etc. I don't know the date of his statement, but if before the Democratic Convention, he would definitely use it to separate himself from Hillary Clinton's methods of negotiations in the past.
at 12:12 on October 26th, 2009
Well while this FOX story ran across nowpublic several times, new economic figures and unemployment figures were released, the Senate was in the process of merging the Finance Committe bill with others and FOX was busy asking the White House to come and debate them.
at 12:35 on October 26th, 2009
I think I may have commented earlier last week that Obama was gonna use a little "tricknology". Know the source of the phrase without looking?
at 12:17 on October 26th, 2009
Yes, all too true. :(
at 12:41 on October 26th, 2009
Are we, the public, that easy to distract? It appears we are : (
at 12:44 on October 26th, 2009
nanute, I do not know that source, what is it?
A211..., yes it does appear so, much to our collective discredit. :(
at 13:05 on October 26th, 2009
Without looking it is either Malcom X or Elijah Muhammad of the Black Muslim Party from the 60's. (The Nation of Islam).
at 13:19 on October 26th, 2009
“Tricknology:” In the nineteen sixties the Black Muslims coined the term “tricknology” for the method The White Man (The Devil) used to trick black people.
Tricknology” is a street corner word, an integral part of the inner city lexicon. It was coined by the Nation of Islam (NOI), and used in at least one public speech by Malcolm, but it was popularized by the Five Percenters, an NOI splinter group which appeals mainly to youth. The Five Percenters made the word an essential part of the black urban vocabulary.
at 13:53 on October 26th, 2009
Does that mean I'm right? The Five Percenters spiritual leader was Clarence 13X, who left the Nation of Islam, or was excommunicated, take your pick, supposedly for not giving up gambling. But I digress...
at 14:23 on October 26th, 2009
nanute
Indeed it does!
At least Clarence 13X was not murdered to get rid of him like Malcolm X. : (
at 14:37 on October 26th, 2009
Clarance 13X was in fact shot in a gambling den. His survival led him to believe that he was in fact God. I understand he didn't win any money that day, which might discount his theory.: )
at 13:29 on October 26th, 2009
Fox will benefit in the short run, solidifying its based of viewers and maybe adding a few. However, in the long run, the extremist right will continue to be the demise of the Republican Party. Obama plays chess, not checkers.
at 13:40 on October 26th, 2009
If he is playing chess, he gave up a rook early with his lame-o stimulus/pork package, and a bishop with his attempt to jam Obamacare thru this last summer.
at 13:34 on October 26th, 2009
Thanks for that important info, A211!!! brilliant as always! :)
And Yankee Jim, that is quite shrewd, I do believe you are correct in all. ;)
And Karl, yes, I recall, you were right! :(
at 17:34 on October 27th, 2009
Hmm. Glenn Beck made this very supposition about a week ago. Guess the man everyone loves to hate beat you to it!