Water Day - Stop Privatization of Water -Blue Gold

by sara star | March 22, 2009 at 05:02 am
1252 views | 74 Recommendations | 44 comments

Videos

FLOW Official Theatrical Trailer

see larger video

sourced by sara star

FLOW Official Theatrical Trailer


          

           WHOEVER HAS POWER

                    OVER THE WATER,

            HAS POWER OVER THE PEOPLE, 

                    OVER LIFE ITSELF. 



  Earth will become uninhabitable and humankind will become extinct. The investigation points fingers at water companies such as Nestle, Vivendi, Thames, Suez, Coca Cola and Pepsi.

The 5th World Water Forum will take place on 16-22 March in Istanbul.

At the moment in Turkey, legislation is being prepared which would give the rivers, lakes and ponds to corporations. In other words, water resources themselves may be transferred to the corporations, which until now only ran water distribution services. This is a new phase in the privatization of water. Therefore the 5th World Water Forum that is going to take place in Turkey is extremely crucial and this move of water corporations must urgently be stopped.



Quote

Those who are committed to the privatisation of water, making it a commodity like oil, are denying people a human right as basic as the air we breathe.
United Nations
For Love of Water is a powerful expose into how we use and abuse water. Wired Magazine called it "the scariest movie at Sundance." And for good reason.


Photos

WORLD WATER DAY 2009

WORLD WATER DAY 2009

see larger image

uploaded by msokal

Water for Profit is a CBC Radio's special series on the privatization of water.

In the past ten years, three giant global corporations have quietly assumed control over the water supplied to almost 300 million people in every continent of the world.
Who are these WATER BARONS?

Key findings include:
A Handful of Corporations Seek to Privatize the World’s Water

France’s Suez and Vivendi Environnement, and Thames Water, owned by Germany’s RWE AG, dominate the private water market globally. They are joined, to a lesser extent, by Saur of France and United Utilities of England, working with Bechtel of the United States. In 1990, private water companies were active in about a dozen countries. By 2002, they were operating in at least 56 countries and two territories. The companies have worked closely with the World Bank and other international financial institutions and lobby aggressively for legislation and trade laws to require cities to privatize their water.

Quote

You can switch from Coke to Pepsi but you can't switch from water to... what?
David Boys

 

recommend This comment thread is now closed
3
israeli.agent

Some news of interest. A bit old, but still relevant in the light of this story.


Villagers in Keralas Plachimada village continue to demand the closure of the Coca Cola plant, saying that it poses a threat to the environment.

Plachimada (Kerala), Apr 25 : Villagers in Kerala's Plachimada village continue to demand the closure of the Coca Cola plant, saying that it poses a threat to the environment.

Claiming that thousands of people had been adversely affected by the plant, social activist, Medha Patkar, who is spearheading the protest, said the plant is damaging the area's ground water resources.

"It is not just the coloured beverage which is anyway poisonous as proved by the scientists of the Center of Science, but it is also the bottling of water that has really exploited our ground reserves that has killed our aquifers, and that has really encroached upon the people's rights to natural resources and the right to plan with those resources," said Patkar.

The protests have been on for the last six years.


.Agent.

1
sara star

This is incredible. I am glad the people of India are demonstrating against this.

2
gerrypopplestone

Sadly, they found that Coco Cola was not the major culprit for destroying the local water supplies.  Local factories were doing far more damage.  I don't like or support Coco Cola (hate the stuff myself) but there is a lot of nonesense talked about big business some times!

1
sara star

Thanks for the update. Can you tell me where you got this information?

Newest information shows that there is still controversy.

As the summer of 2009 approaches, the village of Kala Dera in north India is bracing itself for yet another season of acute water shortages – thanks largely to Coca-Cola. Coca-Cola should never have located its bottling plant in a drought prone area which had already been declared as overexploited by the government.
Groundwater levels dropped dramatically, and wells ran dry, farmers did not have enough water to have successful crop yields, and women now had to walk miles longer just to access potable water. Over 60 villages in the vicinity of the Coca-Cola bottling plant felt the dramatic impacts once Coca-Cola started its operations in Kala Dera. According to government figures, the water tables in Kala Dera fell nearly 10 meters in just the first five years of Coca-Cola's operations!
If Coca-Cola is serious about sustainable communities, as it announces to everyone through its "Corporate Social Responsibility" initiatives, then the company would meet one of the recommendations made by the study it funded. Meeting both Coca-Cola's and the community's needs for water in Kala Dera are not sustainable. One has to go, and it must be Coca-Cola.


0
gerrypopplestone

Yeah, Sara.  I can do but it will take some time to dig it up.  Think it was Fred Pearce in his last book on Rivers.

0
gerrypopplestone

The Plachimada story is rather old and things have changed since then!  The protests stopped some time ago.  And the activist's complaints are not that accurate.  Coco-Cola established its plant there in 1998.  It was the biggest C-C plant in Asia.  So naturally the local farmers were none too pleased.

When Medha Patkar began the campaign, C_C was taking 130,000 litres of water a year from pumps on its 40 acre site.  Sounds a lot.  What this article does not point out (facts supplied by Fred Pearce - for 20 years a writer for New Scientist and now a consultant to them - was that any farmer with 25+ acres in the valley growing rice, would also be using the same amoiunt for the rice crops!  That was what made the farmers angry.  They were all at it - C-C and each farmer.  It could not go on for ever!  (It is one of the key issues of Indian farming chaos at present).

The international press got hold of the story (as any good community activist would endeavour to do) and had a field day!  Big, nasty capitalist company takes away all the water!  The local farmers took C-C to court and won.  The factory got closed.

BUT the case decision then got reversed, much to the anger of the farmers. (two:one  to C-C!).  So the village council then claimed that in law it had final say!  (Nice move!).  The factory stayed closed.  But C-C took the case to the Indian Supreme Court (very nice move! - check mate?).  Cases therev take a lot of time to progress.  The factory remained cklosed at the time that Fre Pearce wrote his manuscript in 2005.  Someomne needs to find out what has occurred since then.  Over to you. 

It just shows that news is socially constructed and big papers likwe juicy stories but rarely follow up the cases tjhey write about.  NEVER TRUST A JOURNALIST!!!

As you can see, I don't believe in looking for demons and saints:  lifwe is a bit more complicated.  I dont like C-C and nevber drink the stuff - but the claim tghe liquid is poisonous is fraudulent and the activist should be taken to court for unprofessional behaviour! When I was a community activist:  one golden rule was CHECK YOUR FACTS!  Will they stand up to being challenged!

The book:  Fred Pearce - When The Rivers Run Dry, 2006, page 44.

PS:  One person who has taken on Coco-Cola (or was it Pepsi?) is Sunita Nurain, from the Centre for Science and the Environment, in New Delhi.  CSE won too!

2
gerrypopplestone

We need a bit of perspective on water and private companies.  Often local authorities have created the problems through corruption, stupid pricing that bears little relation to the cost or scarcity, a huge lack of both future planning and investments.  Private companies are usually far more efficient in the way they allocate resources, they invest in the future, and they are mindful that their shareholdwers are watching them all the time.  Unlike local authorities where politicians have their fingers in the honeypot.

It is essential that poor people have access to permanent water supplies.  that is the only way they are to get cheap water (it can be subsidised by the state too).  At present, under ocal authorities it is often the middle classes that get cheap water.  Surely that cannot be allowed to continue!

1
sara star

You make a valid point. There are a lot of good companies out there. Too bad greed has been prevalent in too many. 

With a commodity like water, there has to be strict regulation... you are dealing with people's lives here. Who owns the water, owns the people.

1
gerrypopplestone

I'm not sure what aspects you feel need regulation.  India has made a comlete mess of its water supplies by subsidising water for farmers and hence encouraging hude wastage. It's possible to offer cheaper water to mpoorer people and get that subsidised by wealthier people - in a way like budget airlines. But the allocation needs to be done through the price mechaism.  Otherwise you get wastages.

But I am not in the main an advocate of privatisation.  The Brookings Insitute recently presented some report report on resources (forget its title:  Ive got it in the UK).  I read the chapter on water by some so called expert.  I was horriied.  All he advocated was privatisation. Nothing else.  But equally many public water authorities have been appalling at their lack of forward thinking, investing, distribution - especially in tacklin shanty housing.  They are responsible for such a lot of the wastes that goes on. 

5
Amaad

First of all I will applaud Sara for bringing up this story and agent for catching it and commenting.. it is a horrific development and I am afraid that this fear will become a reality in the near future.
Re subcontinent the time is now, that India and Pakistan settle the Kashmir dispute which is not just about a peace of land but it is about over a water resource that originates from Kashmir and caters for over a billion population of the sub continent.

Former Pakistani president Musharraf  highlighted that issue in his last visit in India in his speech organized by some forum.  But sadly the participants didn’t take notice or picked up on that point.

I have noticed few stories in the past few years where some major multinational companies have been secretly acquiring water resources. The involvement of IMF is even more frightening for the third world economically failed countries like Pakistan who can be forced to sign contracts and deals by IMF that will suit companies like Nestle and Pepsi etc. During my last job at a very major US company (I wont give the name) my UK based finance director during a meeting said with a smug on his face that the company was spending millions of dollars of spare cash in India in the water resources to “safeguard” its future interests. What really made me feel disgusted was the way he mentioned India as if it was an item or a card from a deck that would be useful for the company.

I think once these companies will uncover their true face it will be too late and the consequences will be so unimaginable that our  present time with Taliban would look like a joke.

0
sara star

Your words have haunting truth to it.

0
sara star

IMF quick facts:

 

Its headquarters are located in Washington, DC, USA

The primary mission of the IMF is to provide financial assistance to countries that experience serious financial and economic difficulties using funds deposited with the IMF from the institution's 185 member countries.

 Critics claim that the IMF is generally apathetic or hostile to their views of democracy, human rights, and labor rights. The controversy has helped spark the anti-globilisation movement. Arguments in favor of the IMF say that economic stability is a precursor to democracy; however, critics highlight various examples in which democratized countries fell after receiving IMF loans.


4
Paschen

Gaia all over again. 

Water needs to be rationed in the western world, being the most abusive and wasteful of this commodity. 50 of recycle water per capita tops and 5 litter of drinking water per capita tops. 

Private water can not be since it is a natural resource  and can not even belong a to nation per say. African in Africa have as much right and say in the water debate in North America then North American do. 

Water along with Air is a product of Gaia not humanity and some one should start representing the wild life here against Human as well. 

The UN will legislate have to legislate water soon. And speak up for those that can not.

Coca Cola is more often then not blamed wrongfully due to its multi national status. However Coke or other such as Nestle should not ever have a hold on water nor be able to control it either.

1
sara star

Yes... the UN has made a recent statement Mar19/09 criticizing that the Water Forum is profoundly influenced by business.

In a speech delievered by his senior advisor on water Maude Barlow, president of UN General Assembly, Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann, said: Those who are committed to the privatisation of water, making it a commodity like oil, are denying people a human right as basic as the air we breathe.

The UN president also questioned the legitimacy of the forum itself. His speech stated: The forum's orientation is profoundly influenced by private water companies. This is evident by the fact that both the president of the World Water Council and the alternate president are deeply involved with provison of privat, for-profit, wate services

He added that future forums should, conduct their deliberations under the auspices of the United Nations.


3
gerrypopplestone

It's such a pity that the UN Secretary General cozied up to the Water Forum at last week's Water Forum in Istanbul.  That man needs to speak out bluntly and honestly - the Water Forum is a bunch of mafia thugs - with kid gloves, slippery words and plenty of connections everywhere.

3
Amaad

well said Paschen.. every living thing on the planet deserves it.

3
mtippett

I am always shocked at how people take clean water for granted.  If we think a credit crisis has implications, wait until it is the supply of water that dries up.

3
Roy C

Water isn't a right, but a need. I don't mean to split hairs or disagree about the utter importance of water and people's need for access to water.

I don't like privatization, either.

Rights and needs: we are both born with. You can't take away my right to Free Speech, except in jail. You don't hve to "provide" it, but you do, as a government, have to honor it.

But water, housing, clean air,medical care: I need them, and, in a certain sense, I am entitled to them, but the reality is that my need for housing is something I have to provide for from my own efforts, with others, and the same with clean air and water.

RES PUBLICA: the things of the people. This is what the Romans created for their people. It was an entity to replace the need for kings. The Romans had deposed their kings.

A lot of capitalists don't get it. They appear to want to have everything be a commodity, be in control of the commodity and make money.

"Let the Public Be Damned". - Motto of the Robber Barons.



2
sara star

It  may seem like semantics, but has profound implications. That is the debate.

If you believe it is a human right, then you believe that you can’t refuse to give it to someone because they can’t afford it.

The United Nations and the World Bank consider water to be a need rather than a right. This is a crucial difference. The moment water is defined as a “need” rather than a “right”, it becomes possible to commodify it and make it subject to trade.


2
gerrypopplestone

Unfortunately the World Bank acts like a slippery snake where water is concerned.  It commissioned the investigation after getting its fingers burnt on dams it financed that were too costly and failed to deliver.  The Commission on Dams was highly critical of dams and gave a detailed analysis on why. Yet the World Bank did an about turn, after pressure from the Water Forum thugs.  It dropped the Commission - issuing a nasty press release, and carried on funding dams.  I really don't trust those Harvard educated/Wall Street so called experts that the World Bank likes to employ.

2
Roy C

I don't trust the Wall Streeters and Ivy League types myself. Right or left, there is an un-overcome elitism there.

It is a need and we need to pay for it. Money has to be provided to pay for wells, pumps, reservoirs, chlorination, pipes to deliver and sewers.

You can't treat it as you do Freedom of Speech. Calling it "a right" doesn't change the reality of the need to do massive infrastructure to meet the need.

That is why you have a "RES PUBLICA", a nation-state capable of providing water for its people. The "things of the people" get managed in the name of the people.

You pay for it with a water bill and we can subsidize it, but water is never free. And you can't just come to my house and drink my water because you think your "right" to water has been denied elsewhere.

Same with medical care, education, clean air, and a safer neighborhood.

We provide this stuff for ourselves as part of a group effort.

0
sara star

We need to pay for what we use that is not ours. But my well water at home on my property, do I have to pay for that too. Will we have to put a loonie (Canadian dollar) in every time we use a public washroom or fountain. or go swimming? Will we have to pay royalties for the rain that falls from the sky?

Can a company own a river or a lake, or the ocean? That is what they are trying to do. I don't mind paying for infrastructure.

1
Roy C

I agree. We pay for it with taxes and water bills.

But, if water really gets scarce, then you might have to pay a lot more. And, in a restroom, if you flush more than a proscribed number of times, maybe there will be a bill.

If a person can own a lake, then a company can own a lake. A corporation  is a person, legally. We have given the corporations too much power, especially under American law.

No matter that we, the people, get it managed in our name. Unless there is transparency so we can have accountability, we will get screwed, either through incompetence or malfeasance, as in outright greed.

Regulated public utilities in the US get some bad reviews, but the system needs improvement, not an overthrow.

I really didn't like Thatcher's privatization policies regarding public utilities. Other things that she did seemed to be OK with me, but that was just a sellout of the "things of the people" to corporations.

0
albertacowpoke

Sara I have to dig a new well in May (160 ft).  If they pay for the cost of drilling the well, I.ll consider paying them for the water I use out of it.

0
gerrypopplestone

Well said, Roy!  When water was privatised in the uk, there was an uproar, even though no investment had gone into water infrastructure since the stuff was built.  Now, Thames Water has built a new ring main right around London and is tackling the huge watage through leakages.  Also, we have become much more critical of Thames Water and keep demanding they stick to their targets.  That never happened when it was state owned!

3
israeli.agent

"Gaia all over again. "

Thanks for bringing that up..! It was actually forgotten by me for  a long time ...!It is a beautiful concept though.

.Agent.

4
Paschen

Gaia and "the revenge of Gaia" being the latest in the Gaia theory.

http://my.nowpublic.com/environment/revenge-gaia-humanity-under-attack


1
sara star


3
jordan

Superb job with this. For those just tuning in, check out the World Water Day feature channel.

2
Pythiian1

Wonderful work, Sara, for pulling this feature together to alert all of us to be judicious about water resources, which is fundamental to our lives and every living thing on this earth.


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

israeli.agent
First Flagged at 6:10 AM, Mar 22, 2009 by israeli.agent
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (74)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from