NP Rank:
Welcome to the Nation’s Capital powder keg
Without a hole in me
When those long hot summers return,
and frustration with the economy presses down
and criminals come out to do their bidding,
police crackdown and guns fire in all directions,
oh my, let me drive by without a hole in me.
“Since D.C.'s handgun ban ended, well-heeled residents have become well armed
By Paul Duggan
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 8, 2011; 12:09 AMIn the 2½ years since the U.S. Supreme Court ended the District's handgun ban, hundreds of residents in Washington's safest, most well-to-do neighborhoods have armed themselves, registering far more guns than people in poorer, crime-plagued areas of the city, according to D.C. police data.
THIS STORY
· Since D.C.'s handgun ban ended, well-heeled residents have become well armed
· Data: Gun ownership by Zip code
· Your Take: Why the disparity?
Since the landmark court ruling in June 2008, records show, more than 1,400 firearms have been registered with D.C. police, most in the western half of the District. Among those guns, nearly 300 are in the high-income, low-crime Georgetown, Palisades and Chevy Chase areas of Northwest.
In all of the neighborhoods east of the Anacostia River - a broad swath of the city with more than 52,000 households, many of them in areas beset by poverty and drug-related violence - about 240 guns have been registered.
Although police declined to identify gun owners, citing privacy rules, they provided a breakdown by age, sex and location, from the start of firearms registration in July 2008 to the end of 2010. Of the 1,400-plus weapons, more than 1,000 are handguns, mainly semiautomatics, and the rest are rifles and shotguns.
In the 20016 Zip code, encompassing some of the District's wealthiest enclaves in upper Northwest, 151 firearms have been registered. That is more than 10 percent of the citywide gun total in an area with about 14,000 households, according to U.S. Census data.
No other residential Zip code in Washington has seen as big an influx of legal guns since the ban was ruled unconstitutional.
"Mine are loaded - locked and cocked - right where I can get them," said one gun owner in the 20016 Zip code. He is a 64-year-old K Street lobbyist who lives in the affluent Spring Valley neighborhood with his wife and teenage daughter.
"Crime is down to the lowest level, but people always feel insecure," he said. "And when you have responsibility for your family, you have to be prepared."
The lobbyist, an Army special forces veteran of the Vietnam and Afghan wars who retired as a two-star general, was one of five firearms registrants from different parts of the city who answered a reporter's query on washingtonpost.com.
All agreed to be interviewed, but some, including the former general, spoke on the condition of anonymity to guard their privacy.
Except for a burglary in the late 1980s, he said, he has never been a crime victim. He said he keeps two revolvers, two semiautomatic pistols and a Benelli 12-gauge "combat assault shotgun" in his home. The loaded ones are in a quick-opening gun safe in his bedroom closet. He said he wouldn't hesitate to use them.”






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 05:28 on February 8th, 2011
Shoot'm if you got'm. They will.
at 06:41 on February 8th, 2011
People feel in their bones that they no longer can rely on fair enforcement of rule of law. The District of Criminals is so corrupt that it has turned police nationwide into their private secret police force. We have a Shadow Government of Corporations in league with corrupt politicians and their army hitmen. Do corporations care about protecting Joe Schmoe? No. For corporations, Joe Schmoe is just cannon fodder. Smart Joe Schmoes figure this out and know that it will be up to them to defend themselves and their families -- from common criminals and the biggest criminal of all -- the Criminal Surveillance State.
at 07:25 on February 8th, 2011
That's a whopping leap of generalization.
To be fair, being concerned that corporations have bought government is a viable one given that the Supreme has ruled in their favor based on existing law. That means, if We the People want to put an end to corporate corruption and abuse of the political system, we must demand change in law from Congress. It is currently flawed law.
There is no evidence that law enforcement has given up protecting the public in favor of some higher class protection.
Paranoia is frightful and you exhibit it well.