NP Rank:
Welcome to the world of Obamanomics
Only time will tell but if Obamnomics work like similar policies have in Canada Americans better get used to lower standards of living and higher unemployment. That is fine as long as voters understood this when they cast their votes yesterday. If not I feel sorry for my American friends.
Welcome to the world of Obamanomics
Jason Reed/ReutersU.S. Democratic presidential nominee Senator Barack Obama waves on the tarmac at Chicago Midway Airport
As the fervor fades and the hoopla dies, the world will have to get used to a new word: Obamanomics.
It includes tax hikes for the rich, tax cuts for the poor and middle class, a renegotiation of NAFTA, greater union power, windfall taxes on oil and gas profits, higher taxes on capital gains and corporate dividends, and more comprehensive health care insurance.
It may deliver the greater income equality Americans apparently desire but also likely slower growth. Despite the vast tax hikes, it will cost a vast sum and U.S. federal finances, already ravaged by bailouts and recession, will slide deeper into the red.
It is not particularly market-friendly but that does not mean the markets will not like an Obama presidency. If Obama can give the United States back its confidence, restore its reputation and sense of optimism, markets will take the bait as they have done with Democratic presidents so often in the past.
If he can become a Clinton-style pragmatist, resists caving to every whim of a deeply left Congress, and does not meddle with the financial bailouts that seem to be gingerly gaining traction, markets may even run with his presidency. The year from hell for investors could then be nearing an end.
At its heart, Obamanomics is essentially about taking more money from the rich and giving it to the poor, plain old-fashioned "neighborliness" as Obama has described it or, as others have less charitably so: taking money from those who earn it and giving it to those that don't.
Under his income tax plan, Mr. Obama says he will provide tax cuts for 95% of Americans. He will do this by repealing Bush tax cuts and bumping the top rates back to 36% from 33% and to 39.6% from 35%. Individuals earning over US$200,000 and families over US$250,000 will see sizable tax increases. This includes sole proprietors of businesses like lawyers, accountants or plumbers called Joe.
Since 38% of Americans currently do not pay federal income taxes, Obama will provide them with refundable tax credits. Under his plan, 48% of Americans will thus pay no income tax.
"For the people that don't pay taxes, he is simply going to write them a cheque," says Andy Busch, global foreign exchange strategist at BMO Capital Markets. "That is income redistribution at its worst and produces very little value."
Other plans include raising taxes on capital gains and dividends to 20% from 15% for families earning more than US$250,000. He plans to leave the corporate tax rate at 35%, which in a world of rapidly falling rates, looks positively antibussiness. He will introduce windfall taxes on oil and gas companies but offer US$4-billion in credits to U.S. automakers to retool to greener cars.
Much has been made of Obama's plan to renegotiate NAFTA, though no-one seems to believe he will actually make it more protectionist. On the push for greater union power however, there has been no softening of tone.
He was a co-sponsor with Joe Biden of the Employee Free Choice Act. It would allow a union to be certified once a simple majority have signed union cards, eliminating the time-honoured secret ballot. The bill died last year but under an Obama presidency is sure to get resurrected.
Bottom line is the Obama plan is likely to be a drag on growth and it will cost money. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center estimates Obama's program would add US$3.5-trillion to U.S. debt over the next 10 years, including interest. His plans for health care - which may be delayed by financial necessity - would tack on another US$1.6-trillion.
That is on top of the US$2.3-trillion increase the Congressional Budget Office forecasts over the next decade due to recent stimulus measures and financial bailouts.
"It runs up a very large deficit," says Roberton Williams, a principal researcher at the center. "In general, tax cuts that are not accompanied by spending cuts have a long-term negative on the economy." It means taxes will have to be raised later - just as the draw-down from the Baby Boomers begin.
With the U.S. economy festering and job cuts mounting, it is likely Obama will have to hold back on many of his grand plans.
One hopes that once he is able to manoeuvre, he is more Clinton than Carter.
As economist Arthur Laffer recently pointed out in the Wall Street Journal, Clinton thoroughly reformed the welfare system, making job searches mandatory, pushed NAFTA through against union wishes, signed the largest capital gains tax cut in history and reduced spending as a share of GDP by three percentage points - more than the next best four presidents combined.
If Obama is also more practical than progressive and he manages to catch a break from a recuperating economy - thanks to the dirty work performed by Fed chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson markets will breath a big sigh of relief.
Crowd Power
-
eastvanray
vancouver, British Columbia, Canada




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
at 12:04 on November 5th, 2008
eastvanray, I like this story. It's good stuff.
at 12:28 on November 5th, 2008
Americans better get used to lower standards of living and higher unemployment.
[chuckle]
We've been getting "used" to it ever since Reagan was first elected. Over the past eight years, we've had crash course in lower standards of living and higher unemployment. The only thing which would make it worse would have been more of the same, which is one reason McCain lost.
at 12:45 on November 5th, 2008
You need a lesson in economic history. The US economy BOOMED under Regan. Standards of living rose faster than any other time in modern American history. Bush is a whole other story. The war has cost the US economy greatly and Obama may see some savings on the spending side if he doesn't just find another way to waste that money. That, however, would be unlikely. I do not think anyone really believes that Obama will return those savings to the taxpayers. He will spend it and you will not see a dime of that money. Just wait until the economic effects of the "redistribution of wealth" takes hold of your economy. Until then enjoy life and take a big hit off the Obama crack pipe. Soon you will be high on what economist call The Opiate of the Intellectual - socialism. Like all drugs it is fun for a while, then you become dependant on it and finally comes the long, painful withdrawl. Canada experimented with it and we are still dope sick!
at 13:03 on November 5th, 2008
So true, so scary
at 11:14 on November 8th, 2008
Hey, I got a check from Bush and I don't pay taxes, except for sales taxes.
at 08:20 on November 10th, 2008
Following an historic election, let's take a moment to examine just what an Obama presidency will mean to the United States - what we have to look forward to, and how he will deal with our current economic issues. And according Jim Davidson, some of the numbers just don’t add up:
"One of Obama’s specific proposals is to raise the capital gains and dividend taxes to 25%, which will sharply increase capital confiscation as increasing percentages of “gains” will reflect inflationary depreciation of the currency. In the U.S., an investor must pay tax on the difference between the sales price of an asset and it purchase price, with no adjustment for inflation. Consequently, when the tax rate and inflation are high, a large portion of the “capital gain” is illusory. Any asset that appreciates by less than the rate of inflation will result in its owner losing purchasing power and having to pay taxes on the illusory gains. At Obama’s higher tax rates, (he has suggested that capital gains and dividend taxes should be hiked to as much as 25%,) capital confiscation would result from modest levels of inflation.
And the Great Credit Crunch implies that inflation will be far higher than in recent experience.
Setting aside whether it is moral or equitable to force a small fraction of the population to essentially pay for the whole cost of government, much of which entails the shuffling of checks to purchase votes of various aggrieved groups, there is a bigger question. Can it be wise for the whole fiscal regime to stand on the shoulders of a small group, like a pyramid tottering on its point, so that any tribulation which undermines the prosperity of those who pay would promise to bankrupt the state?"