Whack the Enemy or Build a Nation

by YankeeJim | December 9, 2009 at 01:40 pm
170 views | 4 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

General Petraeus | Photo 02

General Petraeus | Photo 02

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

Now, the generals are telling us that subjugating the Taliban in Afghanistan could be as hard as restoring order to Iraq.( I believe it.) Then again, General Petraeus points out that the number dying in Iraq was higher than it is now in Afghanistan (Implying it is easier?). Yet, just a minute General; we’re only getting started in Afghanistan. Wait until the bullets really start flying, you know better than to say something like that.

Speed the surge, slow the progress

The President said he wanted to speed up the surge, get in and get out. Now, the Generals are telling us the truth, we can get in, but getting out of that place is going to take a long time if the end game is to build a nation.

Then, Senator Luger, no friend of the administration, pops off with the notion that we’re wasting resources on Afghanistan when we should be attacking al Qaeda in Pakistan. Of course, Luger misses the whole point about the significance of the Taliban. He also missed the point that the entire Iraq attack was a foolhardy economic sink hole.

I think that it would be perfectly acceptable for President Obama to call up his senior military staff and tell them that he will do the talking for them from now on. It is time for them to surge in, whack the Osama, and come home to Obama.

[q url="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34345847/ns/politics”]

“Petraeus warns new surge progress will be slow

He says Afghanistan is no worse than Iraq was two years ago

WASHINGTON - Progress against the insurgency in Afghanistan probably will be slower than during the buildup of U.S. forces in Iraq two years ago, and the war will be "harder before it gets easier," a top U.S. general said Wednesday.

Gen. David Petraeus, who executed the Iraq surge in 2007, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that he supports the upcoming escalation of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

"While certainly different and, in some ways tougher than Iraq, Afghanistan is no more hopeless than Iraq was when I took command there in February 2007," Petraeus said. Indeed, he said, the level of violence and number of violent civilian deaths in Iraq were vastly higher than what has been seen in Afghanistan.

"The risk is that we will expend tens of billions of dollars fighting in a strategically less important Afghanistan, while Taliban and al-Qaida leaders become increasingly secure in Pakistan," Lugar said.”

[/q]

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
YankeeJim

It is time for them to surge in, whack the Osama, and come home to Obama.      

1
a211423

 but getting out of that place is going to take a long time if the end game is to build a nation.

My impression, and I could be wrong, is that we are not nation building; rather, we are supplying the military training to Afghans, supportive civilian infrastructure, and financial support for Afghanistan to build itself under the direction of  honest and effective governance.  Karsai's responsibility is tantamount to success.

0
YankeeJim

Once again, you are correct. However, making an 18 month down payment on a nation, and knowing that the investment is going to take more like 10-15 years, why not make it clear to NATO and the UN, we're not going to build Afghanistan.

Afgahnistan, For Sale.

First bidder, Taliban...who else?

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

a211423
First Flagged at 2:14 PM, Dec 9, 2009 by a211423
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (4)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from