NP Rank:
What would it take to get the USA to stay in Iraq?
An Iraqi General says he needs 10 more years to develop his army to take over when the USA departs. That’s their problem. If a request came from the Iraq government with unanimous approval, the USA might consider an extension 1) providing they would get paid to do it, and 2) would actually make a profit from the activity. Warriors for hire could become a new business and create jobs for Americans.
“Report: Iraqi Senior Officer Wants US Troops to Stay Until 2020
VOA News 12 August 2010
A published report quotes Iraq's most senior officer as saying the United States should leave its troops in Iraq until 2020.
Britain's Daily Telegraph on Thursday quoted Lieutenant General Babakir Zebari as saying it will be another 10 years before the Iraqi army will be able to ensure the country's security. Zebari was speaking at a defense conference in Baghdad.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the United States is on track to end its combat mission in Iraq at the end of the month as planned. He said President Barack Obama is satisfied that the Iraqi military will be able to take over security operations.
Fifty-thousand U.S. troops will remain in Iraq to serve as a transitional force. Mr. Obama has set a goal of removing all U.S. troops in Iraq by the end of 2011.
Also, Iraqi officials said eight Iraqi soldiers and three civilians were killed in Diyala province when gunmen broke into a house in the town of Sadiyah and killed three people. Police say the attackers then lured Iraqi soldiers to the house before an explosion destroyed it.
And a government official said gunmen shot and killed a prominent female doctor in Baghdad. The official said the victim was chief of the Alwiyah maternity hospital in central Baghdad.”



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 05:55 on August 12th, 2010
What do you make of this?
at 07:53 on August 12th, 2010
Why not, instead of battle groups, keep training cadres on the ground, made up of experienced officers, and senior NCOs mostly, to continue training the Iraqi army up to US standards? In fact, it is my experience that one Sergeant Major is worth about five junior officers (Captains and below) for training purposes. This would show the Iraqi people, and the world, that the <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 />United States is committed to doing the right thing, and seeing things through to the end in Iraq, without having to take the country on as a protectorate, or colonial possession, with all the military and financial aid that would be required. It would also give those who volunteered (or were voluntold) for those positions as instructors a great deal of experience and insight which would benefit the US military as a whole as well as leave a western style military which could, then, work along side western forces, to the benefit of all. Whether in disaster relief, peace keeping, or defending their borders from long time enemies, they would function in a way that allowed other allied nations, at their request, to help function well. Put their troops through boot-camp, and they will be as ready as any American soldier on his first rotation through Iraq are, if not more-so, as it is their country. The US keeps face, Iraq maintains some stability, and the world benefits. The Iraqi people to not want a US military presence indeterminately; they simply want stability and safety, to let them get on with their lives, the same as people everywhere else.
at 08:32 on August 12th, 2010
Piobar, that makes a whole lot sense. It is better that the Iraq General comes up the the request and idea than the State Department of DOD.
at 09:04 on August 12th, 2010
Definately, it would be better for the Defence Department or the Iraqi Government to put the idea forward. If they were to work out a system where the Iraqi Government paid for the training, and the US military were to provide it, Iraq could have a viable Army, Navy, and Airforce, in no time. Say, six month long courses, being run on a large scale, over the next few years, and the Iraqi forces would be as viable and reliable as any force out there, at little or no cost to the US tax payer. The British should be involved as well, to be honest, as they have as much a responsibility in this, and a great deal of experience in this sort of endeavour.
at 10:45 on August 12th, 2010
Roger that.