Where will the poor go from London?

by YankeeJim | June 21, 2011 at 06:07 am
126 views | 8 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

New solutions for an old problem

New solutions for an old problem

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

Where will the poor go from London is the wrong question. Where are the jobs for poor citizens?

Cheap labor in the modern world is an asset. If the workable population can be collocated in locations where manufacturing jobs can be created, then a new working class can propel economic growth.

Government is at the throttle and controls of the nation’s economic engine. The need for economic development and renewal in London is quite apparent.

What are officials doing to attract manufacturing industry? Are they zoning with incentives? Are they providing relocation assistance for workers? Are they engineering new and modern communities for the green economy?

“London’s poor facing squeeze amid housing-benefit cuts

By Anthony Faiola, Published: June 20

LONDON —The choice of the London A-list, St. John’s Wood is a neighborhood of ethereal wealth, its leafy avenues lined with the ample mansions of Paul McCartney, Ewan McGregor and Kate Moss. And yet, they share the most unlikely neighbors — the Kastrati family.

Poor immigrants struggling to survive in one of the world’s most expensive cities, the family of four nevertheless lives in a sunny, two-bedroom flat in an enclave of urban privilege. Their benefactor: the British government, which covers 85 percent of their $3,600-a-month rent through welfare benefits giving tens of thousands of low-income earners access to even the best neighborhoods. But the clock on such subsidized London lifestyles is suddenly running out.

The Conservative-led government is rolling out Britain’s most sweeping welfare reform since the 1940s, taking aim at the ballooning bills in cities such as London, where a few families receive as much as $160,000 a year to ensure economic diversity and quality housing for the poor in some of the priciest districts in the world. Yet as benefits are rolled back, academics are warning of a major side effect: an exodus of the poor from central London in numbers not seen since the demolition of soot-caked Dickensian slums in the 19th century.

London’s population shift may emerge as one of the most dramatic examples of the deficit-busting crusade taking place across Europe and now under serious debate in Washington. On this side of the Atlantic, cash-strapped nations from Greece to Ireland — drowning in debt in the wake of the Great Recession — are rolling back famously generous welfare programs that they can no longer afford.

Few have been as ambitious as Britain, where the government’s push is igniting a fierce debate about the fading European ideal of a right to a good life despite one’s economic standing.

Critics say the reforms could result in a polarization of the classes in this city of 8.6 million, ultimately giving rise to American-style ghettos. Over the next four years, experts say that roughly 82,000 poor families are likely to be forced from expensive apartments in central London and, quite likely, into cheaper accommodations on the fringes of the city or beyond. By 2016, one University of Cambridge study shows, the cuts would leave only 36 percent of London neighborhoods accessible to low-income earners, down from about 75 percent in 2010.

“Families are going to move from inner London to outer London, and as rents keep rising, they’re going to have to move even farther out,” said Helen Dent, chief executive of Family Action, a London-based charity. “This is going to change the nature of London.”

The archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, has decried the reforms, calling them “social zoning” that would push out the poor. London Mayor Boris Johnson went further, describing them as “Kosovo-style social cleansing.” Although he backed off those comments after stinging rebukes by fellow conservatives, the comparison remains particularly poignant for Shpejtim Kastrati, 25, whose family fled to London from Kosovo in the 1990s.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
YankeeJim

And the bright side is London becomes increasingly wealthy. The down side is, shifting the poor without a solution to their core plight will do nothing for the nation.

5
2MUCH4POOR

Councils paying for expensive accommodation for the poor is a waste of money, but like most of DC's motor mouths policies nothing ever changes. The PM certainly seems determined to rock the poor verbally and is an expert at stoking up hatred for his upper crusted privileged classes. Never has there been a PM so biased, rude and hateful towards the lower and middle classes as Cameron but we shall see how well his class war strategist pans out come June 20th when the public gets it's chance to answer back

1
YankeeJim

I am no fan of Cameron or conservatives. I think the burden is on smart people to engineer new solutions, side stepping wasting time with conservatives. Replace them and move forward.

4
workhouseenterprises

Workhouses were a cheap means of housing the poor in Victorian times, as a matter of urgency I suggest David Cameron builds plenty of them.

1
JJgodfrey

I drove through St Johns Wood London NW8 last week and to my surprise found that the roads were falling to bits, humps, bumps and potholes everywhere. The authorities should get down to Avenue road and resurface it,  apart from being a danger to cyclist, it looks a real mess especially in one of the capitals most expensive streets. Oh how London has gone down hill under the Conservatives.

2
YankeeJim

Agreed. Throughout London there is opportunity for redesign and renewal. That takes capital and the ensuing work on infrastructure consumes labor. The trouble is there exists a capital shortage.

Stop participating in the NATO and US-led war machine activities. That will stop the bleeding, financial and otherwise.

The revenue side of the equation needs fixing, that is, the UK must produce superior goods for global consumption. What is it that the UK can produce that fits that mold?

In the past, the UK was renowned for producing metrology instruments used for precision measurement. They produced high quality machine tools. Both are needed to produce high quality consumer products from autos to appliances.

Given the constraints on space in the UK, I think being best at producing consumer appliances that work extraordinarily well in small spaces with a small footprint is an ideal market as world demand increases for them. They must be green by design and production and green in operation.

London could improve transportation by aggressively introducing one-way streets and widening them for improved traffic flow.

Of course, getting the UK to drive on the right side of street is impossible.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 7:00 AM, Jun 21, 2011 by Anonymous (not verified)
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (8)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from