where's the beef

by DrMarty | March 6, 2012 at 03:43 am
90 views | 4 Recommendations | 3 comments

Photos

toothpaste back in tube we've already discounted the dead so...

toothpaste back in tube we've already discounted the dead so...

see larger image

uploaded by DrMarty

FORMER IAEA INSPECTOR SEES "DEJA VU" IN DEVELOPING CASE AGAINST IRAN NUCLEAR PROGRM


Former Chief Inspector the the International Atomic Energy Association in Iraq, during the 2002-2003 period, Robert Kelley, recounted the scandalous way in which incompetent accusations by a single low level analyst were used to provoke the war against Iraq, and argued that the exact same method was being used today to justify war against the nation of Iran.

``When a country goes to war as the U.S. did in 2003, it ends with disaster."  


"It would appear there are no lessons-learned being used in the current hysteria.



The most important is peer review. The accusations leveled against Iraq in the nuclear area in 2003 were largely from the mouth of one single low level analyst in the U.S.  


He got far outside his competence and made accusations that were shredded in peer reviews by far more competent people, yet his view bubbled to the top because the peers were muzzled and his scary message was more welcome in high circles. The November 2011 IAEA Board Report [on Iran] looks like deja vu.''


``....I think the Board of Governors should demand an investigation of the report and an independent review, line by line, of where that information was coming from, and why it was spun so heavily to one side.''


Kelley has spoken out consistently against the current campaign, which is using the IAEA reports as evidence, against Iran. On Feb. 21, he joined with Dr. Hans Blix, the former Director General of the IAEA, and former chief of United Nations inspection commission, UNMOVIC, at the invitation of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC). 


Speaking to the standing room only audience of Congressional staffers, diplomats, political officials, journalists, and activists, the two experts made clear that there is no evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapon, or a nuclear weapons program, and that war against Iran is unnecessary and will be a disaster for the region and the world.  


Both support the immediate return to diplomatic talks between Iran and concerned parties, especially, the United States.


Earlier, in a January 11, 2012 Bloomberg article entitled, ``Nuclear Arms Charge Against Iran Is No Slam Dunk,'' Kelley, a nuclear engineer with over 30 years of experience in the field questioned the evidence presented in the November 2011 IAEA report on Iran.


Kelley describes how the fraud of 2003 was conducted.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
YankeeJim

War against Iran is a last resort. Iran having nuclear capability is a trigger for war against them. Iran can prevent war and can engage the international community in commerce and business by dropping its nuclear weapon development.

Robert Kelley was correct about Iraq. He is not current with regard to Iran that is a different situation.

Iran's verbal statements against Israel and its actions against the west combine with its repressive regime to pose a threat to Europe, the Middle East including Israel, and to USA interests.

Iran holds the key to its fate and that amounts to their deeds and positive achievements.

Dr. Marty's post tends to balance the rhetoric, though the Iranian threat to the world is as large as Iranians themselves advertise.



3
utilaeastwind

What if the strategy was to attack Iran from way back. 

In order to insure a victory, the USA would first need to surround Iran to insure success. Iraq, Pakistan, Afganistan, Georgia a little to the north and Bahrain are all now available as staging grounds for an attack and possible invasion. Yes, invasion.

If I wanted to get even with Iran for the Hostage Crisis and get my oil back I guess that's how I would go about it.

2
'thirty-aught-six"

All things being equal the statement, "Iran having nuclear capability is a trigger for war against them" is BS of the highest order. The US has not gone to war to stop any other country from obtaining nuclear powers. There is no reason for the US to go to war with Iran and the excuse that they will use the bomb to advance Islamic jihad is unfounded. The Chinese used the same rhetoric to extend their hegemony over Taiwan, during the Vietnam war, and in support of North Korea. Did we go to war with China? How about the constant anti-US rhetoric coming out of N. Korea. Have we gone to war with N. Korea over rhetoric? How about 70 years of anti-US rhetoric coming out of the USSR and their interference during the Korean war and the Vietnam war. Did we go to war with the USSR. No we talked and applied trade sanctions. The Obama Administration needs to look to their own hyped up rhetoric and saber-rattling, and stop being two-faced. All the Obama Administration is doing is providing proof that the anti-US rhetoric is valid.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

YankeeJim
First Flagged at 3:55 AM, Mar 6, 2012 by YankeeJim
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (4)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from