Whether Threats are Real or Idle, it's Against the Law

by Karen Hatter | November 7, 2008 at 10:48 am
924 views | 40 Recommendations | 6 comments

Photos

Alaska Senator Ted Stevens (R) indicted, Watch News Conference LIVE!

Alaska Senator Ted Stevens (R) indicted, Watch News Conference LIVE!

see larger image

uploaded by politisite

Now that the people of the United States of America, composed of all races, colors and demographics, have elected the first African American to serve as President of the United States, a possibly torturous road toward healing elements of this nation may be required.

During the pursuit of the highest office in the land, many half truths, untruths and lies have been disseminated into the public domain, causing heightened tensions and for a minority within the populous, an all consuming rage at the choice of an African American as president to lead this nation.

The feelings of any person or group are theirs to feel as that is their right.

However, regarding the President of the United States, it is not an accepted action to threaten the life of the President.

What actions can and will be taken remain in the hands of law enforcement and its various agencies, included among those the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the machinery now in place to counter terrorism as a result of the Patriot Acts I and II, with any terroristic threats, which can and will be defined by law enforcement when they seek those that would harm the new President Elect, to be handled within the fullest extent of the law.

Food for thought the next time someone or some group says, vocally or in print, that they'd like to do this, that or the other thing, regarding the President.

That could be their last wish uttered aloud as a free person for possibly an undetermined amount of time.

 

From US Code: Title 18,871 - Threats against the President and Successors to the Presidency:

(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in
    the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter
    carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document
    containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict
    bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-
    elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of
    succession to the office of President of the United States, or the
    Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes
    any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice
    President or other officer next in the order of succession to the
    office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under
    this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
      (b) The terms "President-elect" and "Vice President-elect" as
    used in this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent
    successful candidates for the offices of President and Vice
    President, respectively, as ascertained from the results of the
    general elections held to determine the electors of President and
    Vice President in accordance with title 3, United States Code,
    sections 1 and 2. The phrase "other officer next in the order of
    succession to the office of President" as used in this section
    shall mean the person next in the order of succession to act as
    President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections
    19 and 20.
 

The above statute was used to prosecute an individual who threatened the life of President George W. Bush in 2007.

The Definiton of Terroristic Threats

 

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
Amy Judd

Good points - we had some expereince with this in the last 24 hours or so... :)

1
dunkelberg

In theory at least, the "Patriot Act" is not just aimed at Islamic extremist terrorists, but extremists and terrorists of all color, race, creed and doctrine of hate and/or stupidity.

Although, during the election I wondered whose life was at the greatest risk.  Was it Obama because nut jobs would not an African-American in office or those who cling to the lies about him see him as a foreign threat.  Or would it have been McCain, as many of the whackos against Obama and a coalition of other nutters would want McCain out of the way to put Palin into the White House.

0
politisite

D.

It is a shame that their are nuts on the fringes of each of our parties.  The back lash that would occur with a Obama death would be too much for us to handle.  I am hopeful that our SS and other groups keep vigilant on this issue.  We have come a long way in America... we don't need a wacko to cause turmoil.


0
Arkydee

Good thing this wasn't in force for the last 8 years, eh?

0
politisite

Thanks for this story

0
RayBanBro66

In today's world post 9/11, anybody that publically utters to bring harm to the President MUST be taken seriously and reported.  Most people with good sense would keep those kinds of things to themselves or in private. To PUBLICALLY  say these things, is a terrorist act that threatens national security. And should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.It is my hope that anybody, whether it be a group, or a private citizen heed US CODE Title 18,871

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

dunkelberg
First Flagged at 10:54 AM, Nov 7, 2008 by dunkelberg
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (40)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from