NP Rank:
White House and Congressional Democrats Reach Deal on DADT repeal
- Lt. Dan Choi Speaks out on repeal of DADT
- Gay Activists Angered by slowness on DADT repeal
- Brown thinks Military should rule on DADT
- Top Military officials: Congress should not lift DADT ban
On Monday, Congressional Democrats reached an agreement with the White House and possibly the Pentagon involving a key legislative step toward the repeal of the policy of gays in the military, called, "don't ask, don't tell".
CNN reports that three congressional sponsors of legislation to repeal the policy outlined the proposed agreement in a letter to President Barack Obama.
Contingencies are based on an ensuing military view's completion and subsequent final approval from the president and military leaders.
Specifically, the proposed agreement calls for repeal to become final only after completion of the military review expected by the end of 2010, followed by a review certification from Obama, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen.
If the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs certify that repeal will not alter the military's standards of readiness, effectiveness, unit cohesion, and recruiting and retention, then an outline for speedy repeal which was laid out in the letter can be effective.
The letter sent Monday night that was signed by Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan; Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Connecticut; and Rep. Patrick Murphy, D-Pennsylvania.
The Obama administration endorsed the proposal in a letter sent to the congressmen Tuesday from Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag, who wrote that the agreement "meets the concerns raised by the Secretary of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff."
Congressional Democratic sources said they hoped Gates himself would explicitly support the compromise language because that could determine whether the measure will pass. Several Democrats in the Senate and House have said they are reluctant to support any legislation that doesn't have complete backing of the Pentagon.
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Susan Marie Kovalinsky
Ledgewood, New Jersey, United States -
Mritunjay
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Recommendations (22)
-
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
-
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
JoshArizona
Tempe, Arizona, United States -
stejeb
United Kingdom -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada










Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (5)
at 07:55 on May 25th, 2010
Surely it's not that complicated......repeal it. If it's needed, have a review at a future date, it's worked perfectly well everywhere else that's ended the discrimination.
at 09:27 on May 25th, 2010
Law is an ass,goes the saying.Those who make laws are what?
at 10:28 on May 25th, 2010
The problem isn't the not asking, it's what happens if you were to answer.
I believe they shouldn't ask you whether you are heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual.
It's none of their business.
But, I also believe they have no right to refuse anyone based on sexuality and definitely have no right to discharge anyone for it.
at 14:41 on May 25th, 2010
Now, how about cleaning up the Gulf.
at 18:25 on May 25th, 2010
YJ,ask these ass holes,the law makers.