NP Rank:
White South African granted refugee status: Canada
Barry Artiste Op/Ed
Well ain't this calling the Kettle Black, in a role reversal, certainly and eye opener on what is going on in South Africa. One wonders what Nelson Mandela's peace train is all about and celebs like U2 who promote concerts on peace and understanding in Africa, guess that White Irish group is okay? Quite the melting pot since South Africa got it's independence from White Rule and Apartheid!
Funny things like this are not major news, as they once were when Apartheid Rule was in the forefront almost daily in the media and Canadian Government contracts emphatically stated No companies or goods and materials from South Africa could bid on Canadian Government work because of Apartheid, but since Apartheid is no more, since Black rule is now in place, the Canadian Government now allows South Africa goods and materials and companies to bid on Canadian Government Contracts regardless that these atrocities continue? Somehow it seems Political Correctness only applies to those of colour, last time I checked White is a Colour too!
An Ottawa man has been granted refugee status after an immigration board panel ruled he would be likely be persecuted if he returned back to his native South Africa — because he is white.
A Canadian immigration and refugee board panel ruled Thursday that Brandon Huntley, 31, could stay in Canada because he presented “clear and convincing proof of the state’s inability or unwillingness to protect him.”
“I find that the claimant would stand out like a ‘sore thumb’ due to his colour in any part of the country,” tribunal panel chair William Davis said in his decision to grant Huntley refugee status.
It’s likely the first time a white South African has been granted refugee status in Canada claiming persecution from black South Africans, said Russell Kaplan, Huntley’s immigration lawyer.
“There’s a hatred of what we did to them and it’s all about the colour of your skin,” Huntley said of the violence wrought by black attackers on many white South Africans.
Recommendations (55)
-
QueensHart
boston, USA., United States -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
jazzyzazzy
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
albertacowpoke
Canada
-
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
The_Cynic
Freddy Beach, Where the deer r, Canada -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (47)
at 03:32 on August 29th, 2009
I'm actually not surprised after all these years of Apartheid. You can't erase hatred overnight.
The seemingly important question here is: What is the South African Government doing to stop this?
at 11:09 on August 31st, 2009
I am born black South African, now an African-Canadian who was forced to flee apartheid repression, persecution for saying no to institutionalized racism and condemnation to a life of a pair of hands for cheap labor for white-only-owned industries that aided and abetted a well organized crime against humanity until 1994. Crime that is endured by all South Africans, black or white, or any other human being anywhere on earth, must be condemned for the medieval barbarism that it represents, not to be politicized and "racialized" for any motivation including a quest for even a deserved asylum. My only brother was murdered in Johannesburg five year ago and the pain that my family still live with as a result of this horrendous crime qualifies me to say I fully understand the frustration of anyone in South Africa, affected by the rampant crime. There is no doubt that the post-apartheid black majority government of South Africa is a very weak one, characterized by its appalling failure, not only to provide adequate safety and security for all its citizens, but also to educate, house, heal and employ them reasonably. Let alone to redress the racial inequities of apartheid. What is most disturbing is that government's tendency to undermine the rule of law and abuse the constitutional institutions for the political ends economic gain of the ruling elite. This government does not fail the electorate because it is a black one, in fact whites are disproportionately represented and occupy economically strategic positions of influence. It fails because of a number of complex reasons including the fact that 1) it was coerced by the international elite groups such as the World Bank and the IMF to adopt economic policies that inherently fail to develop formerly repressed and underdeveloped citizenry to play a meaningful role in the affairs of a free and democratic society; 2) the South African civil society is weak, weakened further by unabated racism and not yet able to hold politicians of all colours accountable. However, the bulk of the black South Africans who were left out during the initial stages of the negotiations to dismantle apartheid, are fast learning the art of organizing themselves and advancing their political interests through the burgeoning social movements that include activism for the right to decent housing, water and sanitation, education, living wage as well as personal safety and security. Other than the ANC constituency, the rest of the black people were not consulted for any mandate to negotiate a settlement with the white ruling party of Mr. de Klerk, which had obtained a 66% whites-only vote to dismantle! While there are some whites involved in these movements in the townships that are a remarkable attempt at participatory democracy, they are few in numbers and their option appears to be emigration to greener pastures mostly in Canada, UK, Australia and the US.There is therefore no persecution of whites by black South Africans, much as there is no persecution of defenseless women and children who are molested without a stop by rogue elements in a society that is clearly grappling with the real teething problems of a new era following year of brutal apartheid. The rest of the black South Africans who are also failed by their government are in fact a magnanimous peace-loving lot who are prepared to have all other whites join them to build that country.
at 10:04 on September 2nd, 2009
I am a South African immigrant to Canada. I agree with most that Moferefe says. But whites are more prone to be attacked by criminals, the reason, white people are seen as SOFT (easy) TARGETS. That is not what I am saying but what most imprisoned criminals confess to. Law enforcement organizations have regular interviews with rehabilitating criminals where they get this kind of statistics in the prevention of crime. Not only are white people soft targets but women and kids are seen as easy targets. And yes, I agree, there are peace loving people that would like the whites to join them to build up South Africa to the glorious country that it used to be before 1994 when everything started falling to pieces.It is such a pity. We will continue to pray for peace and prosperity to everybody in South Africa.
at 19:45 on September 2nd, 2009
I am not aware of the crime statistics and details from the confessions of criminals. There may be some truth in their statements because whites in South Africa did not have the experience of living with violent crime until recently. Black people who were forced to live in the so-called townships which are sqaulid ghettoes at least 10 km away from the border of surbubs where whites lived before 1990, have always lived without much police protection and adapted their own defenses and tolerance to rife crime. Men used to take the law in their hands and patrol the dusty township streets, providing some security for the most vulnerable. For the black people, there was nothing good about the apartheid era but humiliation,economic exploitation and stunting of human development. Apartheid had to go and building a new society cannot be a simple project. I am as frustrated about the ineptitude of the new government as I am disappointed with the likes of Weir who bury their thick heads in the sand. He sounds like a typical white South African who has yet to come to terms with the defeat of racism in South Africa.
at 17:21 on August 31st, 2009
You don't even know what apartheid means you bumbling moron. It simply means seperation.Like you seperate your socks from your shirts, otherwise you'd look more the fool you are!
at 11:31 on September 1st, 2009
I am a white south african who now lives in Canada and apartheid may mean seperation but it involved something much more brutal than that during Apartheid in South Africa. What the White government and supporters of that government did to blacks during apartheid was extensive and brutal. It may have been inteded only as a method of seperation as not to intrude on anothers culture, but it evolved into something horrible. What happened was horrible, but it is over now and it truly does seem like a reversed affect of apartheid, however, the "black's" doing these horrible crimes, are probably not aiming only at whites, they are just as crewl to their own race as they are to whites. In any case, white's and black's are suffering equally in terms of crimes, safety and security. The government is not equiped to control these factors. They do not have the knowledge or the motivation to change anything because they've already looked after their own needs and their needs have nothing to do with the people of South Africa, black, white or a mix of the two!
at 11:20 on September 1st, 2009
Nothing!! South Africa's current president is a ex fellon and convicted rapist. The government will not do a thing.
at 11:35 on September 1st, 2009
Sorry, Jacob Zuma was not convicted of rape, just arrested for it. I wonder how he managed to get out of that one?! Google the guy..he looks like a pimp, not a president.
at 04:18 on August 29th, 2009
Absolutely ridiculous.
at 05:48 on August 29th, 2009
Apparently Cowpoke the rules of reverse racism and political correctness do not seem to apply in this case!
at 16:15 on September 1st, 2009
It is not reverse racism, simply racism. Racism is not a white prerogative, it does exist in all ethnical groups and towards all as well.
South African Air line has laid of every White person they could as well as those of mixed race and Hindu origins.
Not only White are discriminated against in South Africa today, Mixed races, Asian, and other African from out side South Africa have become victims of a new form of Apartheid.
This in all areas of the country, may that be jobs, Armed Forces, Police, Politics or health care...
at 08:07 on August 29th, 2009
These cases always baffle me a bit, but this is an interesting story.
at 08:29 on August 29th, 2009
Funny though Amy, liberal media love to do fluff pieces like Ms. Jones laundry fell off the clothsline, yet stuff like this turns a blind eye to them, hence why my dislike for many biased media
at 11:36 on September 1st, 2009
Yes it is something to dislike. But all forms of media are biased either unintentionally or intentionally. The author or commentators may do so simply by presenting analysis based on as all trains of thought are, our life experiences. Also, everything has a target audience to catter to.
at 09:35 on August 29th, 2009
hence why my dislike for many biased media
Now that I have to agree with.
at 18:42 on August 30th, 2009
The SA government is doing nothing but in fact is as corrupt as the rest and as racist as they come. the new government elected this year was arrested but not convicted of rape a couple of years back... as well as corruption and fraud. at least in apartheid era the white people were not killing black people at will not was any violence against black people encouraged as it is now. South Africa is a dangerous violent and dying but most beautiful country. But during apartheid the world media only saw the bad as i guess is true now.
at 18:19 on August 31st, 2009
I absolutely agree! I wasn't even born when apartheid was active, but as long as I can remember, crimes against whites have been justified by playing the "previously disadvantaged"-card. Its absolute crap! Apartheid was wrong, i think we all agree on that, but at least it wasn't about killing. I would much rather live my life being pissed off at the government for discriminating against me (like the blacks would have been in the 80's) than live my life in fear of being mugged, raped and assaulted! I left SA because I was tired of feeling scared. My car was stolen twice, my brother mugged at gunpoint, my aunt murdered in her home and I wasn't planning on sticking around to see what happens next. There is NO order, NO justice, NO respect for human life. SA is a beautiful country, but its not a home! Not for me. Not anymore.
at 05:23 on August 31st, 2009
Since 1994 when the African National Congress under Nelson Mandela took over the government in South Africa more than 3000 white farmers were killed by blacks. That does not include any white person killed in the urban areas which happens on a daily basis. The figure is probably in excess of 10000. This is a low level genocide and the world is turning a blind eye. Read www.news24.com , www.iol.co.za , www.thetimes.co.za , www.mg.co.za for news on South Africa.
at 08:53 on August 31st, 2009
The article “White South African Granted Refugee Status” refers. Although much of what is contained in the article is true, I take strong exception to the following:
Huntley says “we” (white South Africans) did terrible things to black people. How dare he imply that not one white South African opposed Apartheid and that the entire generation born after 1994 shares the guilt of supporters of Apartheid. Huntley’s sister refers to “African” South Africans. If she understands racism against white South Africans so well, why does she not understand that minorities in <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 />South Africa see being excluded from being African as another manifestation of racism. Refusing to refer to a white South African as African is like refusing to refer to a black person born in Europe as a European. Huntley implies rich people are able to protect themselves with security. I can tell you that there is no security when driving around the roads wondering if one will be highjacked and killed in the process. No one is safe from mugged in the street. For those who do have a lot of money, they are able to buy a limited degree of security once they are in their own homes but even this is no guarantee. In addition, crime is a rampant problem in South Africa that does not discriminate based on colour. Almost every South African of every race has been the victim one or more times of crime. One of the crimes that affected me was when a black friend was murdered for a cell phone. The writer refers to “colonial past based on racial apartheid”. By saying this, she is implying that all white South Africans are colonialists. Colonialism ended a long time ago and, albeit racist, is distinct from Apartheid. It is also tautological and incorrect to refer to racial Apartheid. It was not simply a racially based system; it was a racist system. The writer does not seem to have done basic research on South African history or racial issues before writing this article. That is appalling journalism.
at 18:28 on August 31st, 2009
Eugene First and formost go back and read the article again. Huntley does say "we" though he doesnt imply that ALL white south africans were for the "Apartheid". He is well aware that many were against it. He is a making a statement not a fact. Tribunal panel chair William Davis (THE JUDGE) Says "White South Africans from persecution by African South Africans" NOT Laura Kaplan. He was refering to color "african" being the somewhat politically correct way of saying black (african american.. as in the USA) regardless of colour black or white they are South African. Huntley DOES NOT have a sister. People with the means to pay for it, can buy security. Never will money guarantee that you will not get robbed or killed. Nothing in life can provide you with that guarantee. South Africa has many issue, weather white or black. More power to him in making the choice to come to Canada. The journalist refers to the words Huntley was called as a reference to South Africa’s colonial past based on racial apartheid. (Apartheid—meaning separateness in Afrikaans/ racial separateness, black vs white) Yours is an appalling answer Sir.
at 12:08 on September 1st, 2009
You make a pretty good point as well, however, people see only what they want to see. I think many people will probably interpret the article in their own way and many of the statements in it, similarly to Eugene. The point none the less I think, is that people are generaly uneducated when it comes to matters in countries they have no real relation to (not to mention the uneducated ones that have a relation to that country) and they tend to make their own assumptions based on that lack of knowledge. I think there is a difference between lack of knowledge and opinion and you sir have an opinion and an opinion worth considering.
at 11:44 on September 1st, 2009
Very well said. I definitely agree with many of the points you touched on. I think it is important for people to do some research and know what they are talking about before opening their mouths and blurting out random crap, just beacuase they assume they have enough knowlegde about the subject to generate an opinion. I think doing our part in educating the world on some of the issues taking place in South Africa is the only hope for the people of South Africa, because they definitely do not have a government to rely on.
at 00:28 on September 1st, 2009
Amazing indeed. This is more like an Israeli asking for refugee status in a foreign country as he is under constant threat from Palestinians. The whites in South Africa still call the sots, they run the economy and remain previliledged. You do get those who can't cut it under increased competition for jobs, fleeing to countries like Australia and now Canada. Well I guess Canada has made clear their position for all to see. I have never heard of anyone seeking assylum on the basis of crime ever. Crime affects everyone and in South Africa mostly blacks for logical reasons like residing in the ghetos (townships) where poverty is very strive. Can we discuss the Indian reservations while we are at it? I would advise them to come over for refugee status as I think that deserves assylum in my opinion.
at 02:26 on September 1st, 2009
Lebo You are telling porkies. Fact is, with racist laws such as AA and BEE, whites are not allowed to work. Apart from the hoorendous crime rate, that is one of the main reasons why whites leave.
at 02:13 on September 1st, 2009
Lebo, you are telling porkies. Fact is, through racist policies such as AA and BEE, white persons are not allowed to work. Apart from the horrendous crime rate, that is a reason why white people are leaving the country.
at 03:54 on September 1st, 2009
Read this artcle white liers
Immigration authorities in England have warned Canada to expect a deluge of young, unemployable, white South Africans to arrive in their country after an immigration and refugee panel, made up of white folk who had never been to Africa, bought into former Cape Town resident Brandon Huntley's paranoia and granted him refugee status. "There won't be enough pubs and restaurants in Vancouver and Toronto to employ them all," said an unnamed Home Office source.
On Monday Huntley became the first white person to be granted refugee status in Canada after claiming persecution from black South Africans.
Commenting on the ruling a Huntley's friend, Hannibal Plettervat said, "Brandon was mugged several times by black people. It was a clear case of persecution. They also called him names."
Asked how muggings could be equated to political or racial persecution Plettervat said he didn't know. "But you can ask the tribunal," he said, "they'll be able to tell you."
Asked what Huntley was likely to do now that he was legally free to stay in Canada, Plettervat said his friend would probably spend another few years there, at least until he had qualified for a passport and saved some valuable foreign currency.
He said that once those initial objectives had been achieved Huntley would probably return home to South Africa, buy a house or a small farm and settle down. "You know, the usual."
Meanwhile members of the tribunal panel who ruled that "the claimant would stand out like a 'sore thumb' due to his colour in any part of the country,” reacted with shock on hearing that there were in fact a further five million white South Africans still suffering daily persecution.
"We thought that maybe there were another hundred white people left," said tribunal spokesperson Alba Snow. "We were ready to send a helicopter to airlift them to safety," she added.
Snow admitted that evacuation plans had been put on hold after video footage of Patricia Lewis live in Brakpan had been downloaded from YouTube. "The only person that stood out like a sore thumb in that video was a black sound engineer who looked like he was bleeding out of both ears," she said.
She said the tribunal realised they had it all wrong when further investigation revealed that places like Loftus Versfeld, Constantia and the opposition benches in parliament also contained, "more than their fair share of whites."
at 04:50 on September 1st, 2009
Louis, I work for a company that is by far dominated by whites at all levels and I do not think they will be closing shop as Louis would make it out to be. They have continued to employ predominatly white staff, or other groups and finally blacks to meet the legislatives requirements. No measures have been taken to any of these law breaking comapnies, in fact the government remains persuasive. At least there is a majority of whites back here who are happy with the way things turned and accept that there are challenges which require unity than baeless condemnations and destructive critisism. The world needs to know that the was report last week which clearly shows companies I completely violating the AA and BEE legislation. Now if they were to fully comply I wonder where you and your other cousins would be. Would leave this planet Louis. Unlike the US the blacks are a majority and I don't know in Canada but nature would have them make sure they reverse the well known imbalances of apartheid. For those of you who don't know, white women in South Africa get better opportunities than black men as far as Affirmative action is concerrned as they are deemed to have less priviledged in the past compared to their male cunterparts. As you can imagine blacks feel hard done by that. These are challenges every patriotic South African is willing to deal with until we can get to a balanced and accpetable situation. There are ofcourse those who think lying and twisting things would guarantee them your sympathy and ensure them refugee status. They first targeted Australia and now Canada. Crime affects all South Africans not only whites. As metter of fact more blacks are affected by crime which by the way is not only perpetrated by blacks for obvious reasons.We would recommend you come over and get more refugees if you so please. The current government has and the majority of its people have bent beckwards long enough to try to accomodate these people. We can only wish them good luck. South Africa has refrained to treat our fellow whites like Zimbabwe as we think everyone has a role to play in rebuilding the country for a better future. Good luck to Canada.
at 05:32 on September 1st, 2009
Skhmuba, darling... You can't call people liers... er liars on the basis of a satire. That article you posted there, albeit hilarious, is by no means factual. But thanks, sweetie, for making me laugh - that bit on Patricia Lewis had me in stitches.
at 05:32 on September 1st, 2009
I hate it when expats try to make South Africa to seem like a state in anarchy. I am a black South African living in Joburg, working for company whose work force is predominantly white. Everybody seems to get along quite well, the only horror stories I read are old stories that expats seem to conjure up from nothing. Canada is a sovereign state that makes its own laws. I feel sorry for them as they will now have to contend with a bombardment of refugee status applications from sour, lazy and unemployable white South Africans.
at 12:23 on September 1st, 2009
I would have to agree that for the most part black's and white's get along just fine in SA, but you cannot deny the fact that the crime rate is absolutely insane. When you hear about these crimes, robberies, rapes, torture, muggins and car jackings taking place you automatically know that it was a balck person or a group of blacks (not to say white people do not commit these types of crimes, it's just that the majority of people in South Africa are black). The way the government is set up it is to give "equal" rights, equal meaning the ratio of population should be equal in universities, and the work place. Many white south africans are losing their jobs becuase they need a black person in that role. Employment and acceptance to a university are not based on qualifications, or grades, but the color of your skin. That is why there are people without jobs, black and white. These issues are not racial based, they are consequences of poor governance, causing racial tension.