NP Rank:
Why I miss George W. Bush as one leader of the free world
George W. Bush not only tried very hard to asset the population of the United States by helping their financial growth but he also tried to help Arabs in other countries by giving them freedom of choice in democratic voting and the opportunity to advance as the western world has for many years.
U.S. President George W. Bush signed a 168-billion-U.S.-dollar economic rescue package on Wednesday, February 15, 2008 to fend off a possible economic recession. "I know a lot of Americans are concerned about our economic future. Our overall economy has grown for six straight years -- but that growth has clearly slowed," Bush said at a White House signing ceremony.
Bush was enthusiastic and boasted about the cooperation between the White House and Congress, saying, "We have come together on a single mission, and that is to put the people's interest first." He was very glad that the both of the strong government offices worked closely to accomplish the same goals.
The stimulus plan was achieved after Bush held talks with leaders of Congress last month about "whether or not we could come together to provide a booster shot for our economy -- a package that is robust, temporary, and puts money back into the hands of American workers and businesses," he said.
Now, in 2010 President Barack Obama is earning very low approval ratings over his handling of the economic problems that Americans face and the lack of concern for Americans is noticeable.
After Bush left office President Barack Obama quickly tried to gain political achievement and respect for his continuance of Bush’s economic boosts. Unfortunately, most people have complained that they never did receive them. Then, Obama put a permanent freeze on the paychecks of the disabled in America by stopping Social Security and Veteran’s pension increases despite the heavy inflation during this recession.
By preventing cost of living increases for federal employees and the disabled population, Obama felt that he was doing the country a favor and this has attributed to his low approval ratings. There are many other reasons that President Barack Obama has disappointed voters and the campaign promises which have never been brought into fruition have caused a general lack of respect for Obama throughout American culture.
Bush supported religious freedom but still maintained the American culture that Obama has inflicted cold and uncaring attitudes toward. Bush never initiated ethnic cleansing as Obama seems to continue to support in the U.S.
Obama is supporting religious freedom of the foreign citizens living in America yet he denounces American ethnicity and wants to cram Muslim Mosques down our throats whether it has been accepted fully or not. As a politician he does wind down with saying “I am not so sure it’s a good idea.”
Bush would never make a decision or statement and not follow through and stand fast with his beliefs because he cares about public opinion and when he made his decisions he stood by them until the end, and he did not waffle despite what the media may have said about him over the course of his presidency.
Obama tries to please everyone and in doing so, he actually causes people to turn away from him because he says one thing and does another.
President Barack Obama earned his lowest marks ever on his handling of the economy in a new Associated Press-GfK poll, which also found that an overwhelming majority of Americans now describe the nation's financial outlook as poor. A frustrated electorate could take it out on the party in power — Obama's Democrats — in the November elections. Eleven weeks before the Nov. 2 balloting, just 41 percent of those surveyed approve of the president's performance on the economy, down from 44 percent in April, while 56 percent disapprove. And 61 percent say the economy has gotten worse or stayed the same on Obama's watch.
More than half of Americans now disapprove of President Barack Obama’s job performance, new polling found, as the ground zero mosque controversy appeared to further erode ratings that the nation’s stagnant economy already had damaged. Gallup’s tracking poll for Saturday through Monday found Obama’s disapproval rating at 51 percent, a new high, the organization said Tuesday. For the third day in a row, the president’s approval rating was 42 percent, a new low for Obama. This latest three-day tracking began the day after Obama delivered a speech in which he said that a group of Muslims had the right to build a house of worship anywhere local laws allowed, and that the nation’s commitment to religious freedom must remain “unshakable.”
NowPublic on Facebook
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
UNCENSORED NEWS
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Recommendations (8)
-
Barry ORegan
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States -
pankaj kumar
New Delhi, India 
Anonymous users (2)




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (23)
at 10:49 on August 18th, 2010
Damn, revisionist history already- Bush ran the deficit WAY up, bloated government payrolls, alienated most of the worlds leaders and populations. He started an illegal ware, changed US war doctrine from we respond to an attack to we attack forst (Iraq was a Bush strike first war, making US the bad guys)all in all Bush was a disaster but you hold him up as an exampleYou are folks are feeble minded wing nut far right idiotskeep on blaming Obama fro the left over Bush crap ... jeez
at 12:03 on August 18th, 2010
Yeah, rik. Like the revisionist history that implies Presidents have the power to write or fund budgets. They don't. Congress does. ~ "Illegal war" Right. You reaaaaaaly need a Constitutional refresher, my friend. The ability to declare war is a clearly delineated Presidential power. Congress confirmed the wars by vote and funded them. The only place the wars are illegal is between your ears. I regret marrying my first wife. That was a disaster. But I don't proclaim that the judge who married us was a criminal.~ The Iraq war is over. We won. Twice. 31 million people freed from tyranny. Twice. All the sand you tried to shovel in the gears of the war effort killed additional Americans and Iraqis by prolonging the war... but the American soldier prevailed anyway. Twice. Suck it.
at 12:22 on August 18th, 2010
I feel very offended when Americans describe their president as "the leader of the free world." Firstly, he's not my leader. I'm not American and he is only a leader to Americans, if he is a leader at all. Secondly, his power is very small, mostly the people who run your country are senators, congressmen and civil servants. Your president's actual power is more that of a figure head. Much like our Queen, he has veto power he daren't use except in justifiable emergencies. Lastly, whether the United States of America is actually a free country is debatable in spite of the lipservice paid to that concept. People are "disappeared," marginalized, impoverished, disempowered and enslaved to minimal wages to a high degree. Laws tie up the freedom of speech in insane censorships and what you can eat, drink, and smoke is highly regulated. HOAs strangle homeowner expression and enjoyment while regulations and egotistical enforcers tie up even your business dealings.
One sees a lot from Canada, with the news, entertainment, and expatriots leaking across the border hourly. My American husband is thrilled to have escaped to a free country.
at 14:02 on August 18th, 2010
I don't know what to say to you except it's clearly evident that you are opinionated in a negative way about alot of things...
at 21:39 on August 20th, 2010
Right...because a lot of Americans are moving to Canada...
at 13:35 on August 18th, 2010
Are you related to Rupert Murdoch?
at 14:03 on August 18th, 2010
Why, would that make it better?
at 15:37 on August 18th, 2010
Why George W. Bush ought to hide out
America is in a bad mood. They haven’t forgotten the economic fix we’re in that was amassed by a blunder-filled eight years of shoot’m up diplomacy and let the fat cats rob the banks. By contrast George W. Bush was a better actor than Ronald Reagan, and Reagan was a better statesman than actor.
He pretended to have a military record, joining the US Air Force Reserves, learning to fly a jet, and failing to show up for drills. But, that in completion went down as an honorable discharge. Somebody knew somebody’s daddy.
You have to give him credit for getting through Yale and onto Harvard because that is difficult and no one cuts slack in those programs. He made a great choice in marriage as Laura is a wonderful lady and a great first lady.
He ran for the House of Representatives and lost. That’s a damned shame because we could have seen how he would have performed as a legislator.
He moved on to be an enthusiastic co-owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team, but you have to note that baseball is not like running a business that produces products for the gross domestic product. For enthusiasm, I would say GW has it.
He took on Ann Richards in 1994 for Texas Governor and defeated her. I can imagine Governor Bush doing very well in Texas as the states CEO and he did. He was able to get some work done through bipartisanship, and it was hoped he would carry that forward. In fact, he did. He got everybody on board to enter into conflicts where we should not have. GW is a great salesman.
Bush beat Al Gore in a contested election. Some believe he stole it. I do. But, it doesn’t matter. The election was for Al Gore to win convincingly and he didn’t.
Terrorists attacked America and G. W. came through like a champion in stabilizing the nation. I give him 100% ovation for that. As for attacking Iraq, that was out of control, a blunder. Tax cuts for the rich was a blunder too. So was turning down financial regulation.
Social legislation was partisan and wasteful. No Child Left be Hind was a farce. Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act is OK, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefits for Seniors is a plus. Basically, his programs were dwarfed by an unnecessary war and an unregulated Wall Street and Bushes Big Government.
I am not one to jump on the Katrina bandwagon because I think New Orleans should be returned to its natural habitat.
at 15:38 on August 18th, 2010
I'd point out that the Sept 11 attacks happened on Bush's watch; he was also warned about them and chose to do nothing... except go into hiding afterward. Had he not behaved that way, nobody outside NYC would have any idea who Rudy Giuliani was. So, along with Katrina, Bush really has quite a discouraging record when it comes to stability/security.
I remember the rumors that Dick Cheney had died of a heart attack, which took days to disprove, as he was hiding in "an undisclosed location".
Agreed on 'No Child'. What a joke.
at 15:42 on August 18th, 2010
Well put, Jordan.
at 21:43 on August 20th, 2010
Jordan, you're kind of a d-bag. I noticed you left out the first terrorist attack on the WTC when Clinton was Pres. How come you didn't mention that, Jordan? How come, Jordan? Man, Obama did such a great job with the Deepwater Horizon spill. How long did that bleed for? I couldn't believe how quickly he jumped into action! It was so fast!!! I mean, he just did so much for the people of the Gulf Coast. You fail.
at 16:24 on August 18th, 2010
Jim, I've always found the dissenting opinion offered by Justice Stevens, joined by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer, in Bush v Gore, the decision that gave George W. Bush the election, regarding the disenfranchisement of voters and the subsequent theft of the 2000 presidential election, worth a read.
An excerpt from the dissent:
Source: law.cornell.edu
at 15:29 on August 18th, 2010
Source: theatlantic.com
at 16:03 on August 18th, 2010
Many late night talk show hosts like Leno and Letterman and hundreds of stand up comedians whole hardheartedly agree!
at 16:06 on August 18th, 2010
Yeah, he was a wealth of material for all of those guys, Barry.
at 18:08 on August 18th, 2010
Gangstalking, Cointelpro2, human experimentation, was started under George Bush. But in this case, there are new chemical, biological and electronic weapons.
Less lethal, *they* will say.
But many innocent victims of these anti-terrorist, domestic surveillance programs have known these constant tortures for years , some since just after The 911 incident, and of course, the enactment of the 'Patriot Act.'
at 18:47 on August 18th, 2010
G.W. was as effective during his tenure as Obama has been during his. Obama's advantage is that he doesn't have to come up with foreign policy that can be criticized, just carry on with G.W.'s . Obama can keep the Dems happy in their delirium as moral authority and after two years still blame G.W. for the problems. Which any non-partisan knows were laid at G.W.'s doorstep by the Clinton administration. As it was Bill Clinton who championed and got mortgages for the poor who could not afford them as part and parcel of his idealism that every American should own their own home. Bill Clinton spent eight years lobbing cruise missiles into Iraq rather than declare war or move for any regime change. G.W. got the job done and gave the Iraqi people a course for democracy and self determination. As for the banking crisis the Dems are in that up to their armpits though they still try to blame G.W.. 59 top Democrats receive financial contributions from Fanny May from 1989-2010. Obama getting a total of $130,713 to date. Hilary Clinton getting almost $60,000 so far. From 2009-2010 under Obama the top four American banks have contributed more than 6.5 million in campaign donations. The idea that the Democrats hands are clean concerning the financial crisis is propaganda of the highest order and only believed by partisan hacks. The only people who can see the political situation with any clarity are the independents and thankfully their numbers are growing.
at 20:38 on August 19th, 2010
Al Qaeda killed about 2700 Americans. Bush then "liberated" Iraq by killing over 4000 Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis. Al Qaeda was not even in Iraq until Bush opened it for them!And now there's more than Al Qaeda, Pakistan, and Afghanistan out there to worry about. You do the math, "patriots". Always reacting to every terrorist noise like they're the powerful ones to fear, and you made it even worse!
at 21:46 on August 20th, 2010
You sir, are a rat-fuck!
at 21:39 on September 23rd, 2010
Haha, best you can do is name call and ignore the facts! Dumber than a rat-fuck.Have a nice day, Sir!
at 21:04 on September 29th, 2010
What would you consider an appropriate response to a terrorist attack?
at 10:16 on October 22nd, 2010
You know everytime some american idiot goes on t.v threatening different countries and races or cultures, after bush did the pre-emptive strike puts america at risk. I don't know what we would do in response to the question. Those mouthing off are the biggest fraUDS. They can't beat any body. Uh-- my hope is that whoever they piss off will take it out on them and nobody else. They got your( the one mouthing off ) face and know what you look like and will know where --you-- live and leave us alone.
at 10:08 on October 22nd, 2010
I don't agree with the author of the article. As I remember it. Bush got us into 2 wars. One unfounded but produced a drain on our economy and lost of innocent lives on both sides of the equation and bad behaviors ordered by the bush whitehouse that shamed america period. Bush favored Haliburton and Blackwater who committed crimes against humanity and women paid for with our economy. As bush drained our economy paying top price to these bandits more than we paid our regular military. We are in this predicatment because of bush and cheney and cohort supporters. The portrayal of government was as close to a kingship with loyal subjects, paying off people to do his bidding like evangelicals, with a promise to give them their cut. I truly believe they want george to come back for round 2 of screw americans. I believe that because of articles like yours and others who favor the madness and unjustness. We never would have been in this mess if not for bush. As far as this giving people over seas the right to vote like we do-- what are you talking about. america is demented with this voting business. The repub are the only ones they want to win elections. When others win the repubs don't work with them. They threaten people with death all kinds of schemes and scams. I don't advocate voting to any nation on the say so of america cause you people are a big fat lie and a health hazard. You don't mean what you say about voting. You do everything you can to make sure the winner is going to be a sinister republican. There's no room for anyone else here. I just think it is all about conquering the world by any means necessary even if it is by the method of giving others the right to vote in other countries. I think we are just fooling ourselves cause other nations see this. We by example show how ruthless our system is. Who would want it? What goes on here is a poor example of our behavior with our democracy. When helping the people and giving us what we worked for is cAlled communism, and letting the ultra rich and the corps rule is called democracy HOW PATHETIC!