Why I miss George W. Bush as one leader of the free world

by UNCENSORED NEWS | August 18, 2010 at 10:07 am
646 views | 8 Recommendations | 23 comments

Photos

Why I miss George W. Bush as the leader of the free world

Why I miss George W. Bush as the leader of the free world

see larger image

uploaded by UNCENSORED NEWS

George W. Bush not only tried very hard to asset the population of the United States by helping their financial growth but he also tried to help Arabs in other countries by giving them freedom of choice in democratic voting and the opportunity to advance as the western world has for many years.


U.S. President George W. Bush signed a 168-billion-U.S.-dollar economic rescue package on Wednesday, February 15, 2008 to fend off a possible economic recession. "I know a lot of Americans are concerned about our economic future. Our overall economy has grown for six straight years -- but that growth has clearly slowed," Bush said at a White House signing ceremony.


Bush was enthusiastic and boasted about the cooperation between the White House and Congress, saying, "We have come together on a single mission, and that is to put the people's interest first." He was very glad that the both of the strong government offices worked closely to accomplish the same goals.


The stimulus plan was achieved after Bush held talks with leaders of Congress last month about "whether or not we could come together to provide a booster shot for our economy -- a package that is robust, temporary, and puts money back into the hands of American workers and businesses," he said.


Now, in 2010 President Barack Obama is earning very low approval ratings over his handling of the economic problems that Americans face and the lack of concern for Americans is noticeable.


After Bush left office President Barack Obama quickly tried to gain political achievement and respect for his continuance of Bush’s economic boosts. Unfortunately, most people have complained that they never did receive them. Then, Obama put a permanent freeze on the paychecks of the disabled in America by stopping Social Security and Veteran’s pension increases despite the heavy inflation during this recession.


By preventing cost of living increases for federal employees and the disabled population, Obama felt that he was doing the country a favor and this has attributed to his low approval ratings. There are many other reasons that President Barack Obama has disappointed voters and the campaign promises which have never been brought into fruition have caused a general lack of respect for Obama throughout American culture.


Bush supported religious freedom but still maintained the American culture that Obama has inflicted cold and uncaring attitudes toward. Bush never initiated ethnic cleansing as Obama seems to continue to support in the U.S.


Obama is supporting religious freedom of the foreign citizens living in America yet he denounces American ethnicity and wants to cram Muslim Mosques down our throats whether it has been accepted fully or not. As a politician he does wind down with saying “I am not so sure it’s a good idea.”


Bush would never make a decision or statement and not follow through and stand fast with his beliefs because he cares about public opinion and when he made his decisions he stood by them until the end, and he did not waffle despite what the media may have said about him over the course of his presidency.


Obama tries to please everyone and in doing so, he actually causes people to turn away from him because he says one thing and does another.

President Barack Obama earned his lowest marks ever on his handling of the economy in a new Associated Press-GfK poll, which also found that an overwhelming majority of Americans now describe the nation's financial outlook as poor. A frustrated electorate could take it out on the party in power — Obama's Democrats — in the November elections. Eleven weeks before the Nov. 2 balloting, just 41 percent of those surveyed approve of the president's performance on the economy, down from 44 percent in April, while 56 percent disapprove. And 61 percent say the economy has gotten worse or stayed the same on Obama's watch.
More than half of Americans now disapprove of President Barack Obama’s job performance, new polling found, as the ground zero mosque controversy appeared to further erode ratings that the nation’s stagnant economy already had damaged. Gallup’s tracking poll for Saturday through Monday found Obama’s disapproval rating at 51 percent, a new high, the organization said Tuesday. For the third day in a row, the president’s approval rating was 42 percent, a new low for Obama. This latest three-day tracking began the day after Obama delivered a speech in which he said that a group of Muslims had the right to build a house of worship anywhere local laws allowed, and that the nation’s commitment to religious freedom must remain “unshakable.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
8
rik

Damn, revisionist history already- Bush ran the deficit WAY up, bloated government payrolls, alienated most of the worlds leaders and populations. He started an illegal ware, changed US war doctrine from we respond to an attack to we attack forst (Iraq was a Bush strike first war, making US the bad guys)all in all Bush was a disaster but you hold him up as an exampleYou are folks are feeble minded wing nut far right idiotskeep on blaming Obama fro the left over Bush crap ...  jeez

0
Dwightwannabe

Yeah, rik. Like the revisionist history that implies Presidents have the power to write or fund budgets. They don't. Congress does. ~ "Illegal war" Right. You reaaaaaaly need a Constitutional refresher, my friend. The ability to declare war is a clearly delineated Presidential power. Congress confirmed the wars by vote and funded them. The only place the wars are illegal is between your ears. I regret marrying my first wife. That was a disaster. But I don't proclaim that the judge who married us was a  criminal.~ The Iraq war is over. We won. Twice. 31 million people freed from tyranny. Twice. All the sand you tried to shovel in the gears of the war effort killed additional Americans and Iraqis by prolonging the war... but the American soldier prevailed anyway. Twice. Suck it.

2
anarkissed

I feel very offended when Americans describe their president as "the leader of the free world."  Firstly, he's not my leader.  I'm not American and he is only a leader to Americans, if he is a leader at all.  Secondly, his power is very small, mostly the people who run your country are senators, congressmen and civil servants.  Your president's actual power is more that of a figure head.  Much like our Queen, he has veto power he daren't use except in justifiable emergencies.  Lastly, whether the United States of America is actually a free country is debatable in spite of the lipservice paid to that concept.  People are "disappeared," marginalized, impoverished, disempowered and enslaved to minimal wages to a high degree.  Laws tie up the freedom of speech in insane censorships and what you can eat, drink, and smoke is highly regulated.  HOAs strangle homeowner expression and enjoyment while regulations and egotistical enforcers tie up even your business dealings.

One sees a lot from Canada, with the news, entertainment, and expatriots leaking across the border hourly.  My American husband is thrilled to have escaped to a free country.

0
UNCENSORED NEWS

I don't know what to say to you except it's clearly evident that you are opinionated in a negative way about alot of things...

0
ArcherCollins

Right...because a lot of Americans are moving to Canada...

1
YankeeJim

Are you related to Rupert Murdoch?

0
UNCENSORED NEWS

Why, would that make it better?

1
YankeeJim

Why George W. Bush ought to hide out

America is in a bad mood. They haven’t forgotten the economic fix we’re in that was amassed by a blunder-filled eight years of shoot’m up diplomacy and let the fat cats rob the banks. By contrast George W. Bush was a better actor than Ronald Reagan, and Reagan was a better statesman than actor.

He pretended to have a military record, joining the US Air Force Reserves, learning to fly a jet, and failing to show up for drills. But, that in completion went down as an honorable discharge. Somebody knew somebody’s daddy.

You have to give him credit for getting through Yale and onto Harvard because that is difficult and no one cuts slack in those programs. He made a great choice in marriage as Laura is a wonderful lady and a great first lady.

He ran for the House of Representatives and lost. That’s a damned shame because we could have seen how he would have performed as a legislator.

He moved on to be an enthusiastic co-owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team, but you have to note that baseball is not like running a business that produces products for the gross domestic product. For enthusiasm, I would say GW has it.

He took on Ann Richards in 1994 for Texas Governor and defeated her.  I can imagine Governor Bush doing very well in Texas as the states CEO and he did. He was able to get some work done through bipartisanship, and it was hoped he would carry that forward. In fact, he did. He got everybody on board to enter into conflicts where we should not have. GW is a great salesman.

Bush beat Al Gore in a contested election. Some believe he stole it. I do. But, it doesn’t matter. The election was for Al Gore to win convincingly and he didn’t.

Terrorists attacked America and G. W. came through like a champion in stabilizing the nation. I give him 100% ovation for that. As for attacking Iraq, that was out of control, a blunder. Tax cuts for the rich was a blunder too. So was turning down financial regulation.

Social legislation was partisan and wasteful. No Child Left be Hind was a farce. Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act is OK, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefits for Seniors is a plus. Basically, his programs were dwarfed by an unnecessary war and an unregulated Wall Street and Bushes Big Government.

I am not one to jump on the Katrina bandwagon because I think New Orleans should be returned to its natural habitat.


3
Jordan Yerman

I'd point out that the Sept 11 attacks happened on Bush's watch; he was also warned about them and chose to do nothing... except go into hiding afterward. Had he not behaved that way, nobody outside NYC would have any idea who Rudy Giuliani was. So, along with Katrina, Bush really has quite a discouraging record when it comes to stability/security.

I remember the rumors that Dick Cheney had died of a heart attack, which took days to disprove, as he was hiding in "an undisclosed location".

Agreed on 'No Child'. What a joke.

1
Karen Hatter

Well put, Jordan.

0
archercollins

Jordan, you're kind of a d-bag.  I noticed you left out the first terrorist attack on the WTC when Clinton was Pres.  How come you didn't mention that, Jordan?  How come, Jordan? Man, Obama did such a great job with the Deepwater Horizon spill.  How long did that bleed for?  I couldn't believe how quickly he jumped into action!  It was so fast!!!  I mean, he just did so much for the people of the Gulf Coast.  You fail.

2
Karen Hatter

Jim, I've always found the dissenting opinion offered by Justice Stevens, joined by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer, in Bush v Gore, the decision that gave George W. Bush the election, regarding the disenfranchisement of voters and the subsequent theft of the 2000 presidential election, worth a read.

An excerpt from the dissent:

In the interest of finality, however, the majority effectively orders the disenfranchisement of an unknown number of voters whose ballots reveal their intent–and are therefore legal votes under state law–but were for some reason rejected by ballot-counting machines. It does so on the basis of the deadlines set forth in Title 3 of the United States Code. Ante, at 11.


But, as I have already noted, those provisions merely provide rules of decision for Congress to follow when selecting among conflicting slates of electors. Supra, at 2. They do not prohibit a State from counting what the majority concedes to be legal votes until a bona fide winner is determined. Indeed, in 1960, Hawaii appointed two slates of electors and Congress chose to count the one appointed on January 4, 1961, well after the Title 3 deadlines. See Josephson & Ross, Repairing the Electoral College, 22 J. Legis. 145, 166, n. 154 (1996).5


Thus, nothing prevents the majority, even if it properly found an equal protection violation, from ordering relief appropriate to remedy that violation without depriving Florida voters of their right to have their votes counted. As the majority notes, “[a] desire for speed is not a general excuse for ignoring equal protection guarantees.” Ante, at 10.

 

2
Karen Hatter
Economists would cite many reasons why presidential terms are an imperfect frame for tracking economic trends. The business cycle doesn't always follow the electoral cycle. A president's economic record is heavily influenced by factors out of his control. Timing matters and so does good fortune.
But few would argue that national economic policy is irrelevant to economic outcomes. And rightly or wrongly, voters still judge presidents and their parties largely by the economy's performance during their watch. In that assessment, few measures do more than the Census data to answer the threshold question of whether a president left the day to day economic conditions of average Americans better than he found it.

If that's the test, today's report shows that Bush flunked on every relevant dimension-and not just because of the severe downturn that began last year.
Consider first the median income. When Bill Clinton left office after 2000, the median income-the income line around which half of households come in above, and half fall below-stood at $52,500 (measured in inflation-adjusted 2008 dollars). When Bush left office after 2008, the median income had fallen to $50,303. That's a decline of 4.2 per cent.
That leaves Bush with the dubious distinction of becoming the only president in recent history to preside over an income decline through two presidential terms, notes Lawrence Mishel, president of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute. The median household income increased during the two terms of Clinton (by 14 per cent, as we'll see in more detail below), Ronald Reagan (8.1 per cent), and Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford (3.9 per cent).

As Mishel notes, although the global recession decidedly deepened the hole-the percentage decline in the median income from 2007 to 2008 is the largest single year fall on record-average families were already worse off in 2007 than they were in 2000, a remarkable result through an entire business expansion. "What is phenomenal about the years under Bush is that through the entire business cycle from 2000 through 2007, even before this recession...working families were worse off at the end of the recovery, in the best of times during that period, than they were in 2000 before he took office," Mishel says.

Bush's record on poverty is equally bleak. When Clinton left office in 2000, the Census counted almost 31.6 million Americans living in poverty. When Bush left office in 2008, the number of poor Americans had jumped to 39.8 million (the largest number in absolute terms since 1960.) Under Bush, the number of people in poverty increased by over 8.2 million, or 26.1 per cent. Over two-thirds of that increase occurred before the economic collapse of 2008.
The trends were comparably daunting for children in poverty. When Clinton left office nearly 11.6 million children lived in poverty, according to the Census. When Bush left office that number had swelled to just under 14.1 million, an increase of more than 21 per cent.
The story is similar again for access to health care. When Clinton left office, the number of uninsured Americans stood at 38.4 million. By the time Bush left office that number had grown to just over 46.3 million, an increase of nearly 8 million or 20.6 per cent.
The trends look the same when examining shares of the population that are poor or uninsured, rather than the absolute numbers in those groups. When Clinton left office in 2000 13.7 per cent of Americans were uninsured; when Bush left that number stood at 15.4 per cent. (Under Bush, the share of Americans who received health insurance through their employer declined every year of his presidency-from 64.2 per cent in 2000 to 58.5 per cent in 2008.) 
When Clinton left the number of Americans in poverty stood at 11.3 per cent; when Bush left that had increased to 13.2 per cent. The poverty rate for children jumped from 16.2 per cent when Clinton left office to 19 per cent when Bush stepped down.

0
Barry ORegan

Many late night talk show hosts like Leno and Letterman and hundreds of stand up comedians whole hardheartedly agree!

0
Karen Hatter

Yeah, he was a wealth of material for all of those guys, Barry.

0
anon333

Gangstalking, Cointelpro2, human experimentation, was started under George Bush. But in this case, there are new chemical, biological and electronic weapons.

Less lethal, *they* will say.

But many innocent victims of these anti-terrorist, domestic surveillance programs have known these constant tortures for years , some since just after The 911 incident, and of course, the enactment of the 'Patriot Act.'

0
“thirty-aught-six”

G.W. was as effective during his tenure as Obama has been during his. Obama's advantage is that he doesn't have to come up with foreign policy that can be criticized, just carry on with G.W.'s . Obama can keep the Dems happy in their delirium as moral authority and after two years still blame G.W. for the problems. Which any non-partisan knows were laid at G.W.'s doorstep by the Clinton administration. As it was Bill Clinton who championed and got mortgages for the poor who could not afford them as part and parcel of his idealism that every American should own their own home. Bill Clinton spent eight years lobbing cruise missiles into Iraq rather than declare war or move for any regime change. G.W. got the job done and gave the Iraqi people a course for democracy and self determination. As for the banking crisis the Dems are in that up to their armpits though they still try to blame G.W..  59 top Democrats receive financial contributions from Fanny May from 1989-2010. Obama getting a total of $130,713 to date. Hilary Clinton getting almost $60,000 so far. From 2009-2010 under Obama the top four American banks have contributed more than 6.5 million in campaign donations. The idea that the Democrats hands are clean concerning the financial crisis is propaganda of the highest order and only believed by partisan hacks. The only people who can see the political situation with any clarity are the independents and thankfully their numbers are growing. 

1
Bush Kills

Al Qaeda killed about 2700 Americans. Bush then "liberated" Iraq by killing over 4000 Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis. Al Qaeda was not even in Iraq until Bush opened it for them!And now there's more than Al Qaeda, Pakistan, and Afghanistan out there to worry about. You do the math, "patriots". Always reacting to every terrorist noise like they're the powerful ones to fear, and you made it even worse!

1
Table for One

You sir, are a rat-fuck!

1
Bush Kills

Haha, best you can do is name call and ignore the facts! Dumber than a rat-fuck.Have a nice day, Sir!

0
FaithlessTemplar

What would you consider an appropriate response to a terrorist attack?

0
lyn lyn

You know everytime some american idiot goes on t.v threatening different countries and races or cultures, after bush did the pre-emptive strike puts america at risk.  I don't know what we would do in response to the question. Those mouthing off are the biggest fraUDS. They can't beat any body. Uh-- my hope is that whoever they piss off will take it out on them and nobody else. They got your( the one mouthing off ) face and know what you look like and will know where --you-- live and leave us alone.

0
lyn lyn

I don't agree with the author of the article. As I remember it. Bush got us into 2 wars. One unfounded but produced a drain on our economy and lost of innocent lives on both sides of the equation and bad behaviors ordered by the bush whitehouse that shamed america period. Bush favored Haliburton and  Blackwater who committed crimes against humanity and women paid for with our economy. As bush drained our economy paying top price to these bandits more than we paid our regular military. We are in this predicatment because of bush and cheney and cohort supporters. The portrayal of government was as close to a kingship with loyal subjects, paying off people to do his bidding like evangelicals, with a promise to give them their cut. I truly believe they want george to come back for round 2 of screw americans. I believe that because of articles like yours and others who favor the madness and unjustness. We never would have been in this mess if not for bush. As far as this giving people over seas the right to vote like we do-- what are you talking about. america is demented with this voting business. The repub are the only ones they want to win elections. When others win the repubs  don't work with them. They threaten people with death all kinds of schemes and scams. I don't advocate voting to any nation on the say so of america cause you people are a big fat lie and a health hazard. You don't mean what you say about voting. You do everything you can to make sure the winner is going to be a sinister republican. There's no room for anyone else here. I just think it is all about conquering the world by any means necessary even if it is by the method of giving others the right to vote in other countries. I think we are just fooling ourselves cause other nations see this. We by example show how ruthless our system is. Who would want it? What goes on here is a poor example of our behavior with our democracy. When helping the people and giving us what we worked for is cAlled communism, and letting the ultra rich and the corps rule is called democracy HOW PATHETIC!

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

pankaj kumar
First Flagged at 10:24 AM, Aug 18, 2010 by pankaj kumar
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (8)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from