Why liberals can't understand Glenn Beck, and why it matters

by lounsbury | September 16, 2009 at 02:22 pm
1064 views | 13 Recommendations | 7 comments

Videos

CNBC's Rick Santelli's Chicago Tea Party

see larger video

sourced by lounsbury

CNBC's Rick Santelli's Chicago Tea Party

It's too bad that folks on the left can't understand Beck because he articulates what a growing majority of Americans think and feel. That the liberal knee jerk reaction about Beck is that he is another Rush Limbaugh, and this just underscores a monumental misunderstanding of the political movement that frustrates them so much.

The problem is that liberals feel as if Obama's 53% was a mandate for the ushering in of European style social democracy in America, but they fail to grasp the fact that Obama's 53% (1% greater than Bush's 52% in 2004) represents the fact that Obama sold himself as something that we later found out he is not: A slightly left of President Bush moderate.

What Obama did manage to do was to force Americans to re-evaluate their political beliefs, and again this is something that liberals just can't seem to grasp. The fact of the matter is that when the majority of Obama supporters who thought that all of the charges against him such as his alignment with Saul Alinsky, ACORN and the radical black nationalist church he attended, were what liberals told them they were... false charges. The fly in the ointment was that as when Obama changed roles roles from campaigner to President this particular block of voters saw two things: 1) that when Obama did govern he validated the charges made against him by the right during the campaign, and 2) that Obama did a lot more campaigning than governing once elected as President of the United States.

The true history of the Tea Party Movement

CNBC analyst Rick Santelli, reporting from the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade, went on an epic rant regarding the stimulus package saying, "The government is promoting bad behavior," before turning to the traders on the floor and whipping them up into a frenzy. He also calls for a Chicago Tea Party in July, saying - at the 2:10 mark - "All you capitalists that wanna show up to Lake Michigan, I'm gonna start organizing it...I'll be dumping in some derivative securities..."

You'll get alternate versions all over the internet where Rush Limbaugh Ron Paul are credited with the genesis of the movement, but the fact of the matter is that that is the spin that is merely "believed" to be true by folks who "desire" it to be true.


The Tea Party Movement began as a revolt against the Obama Administration's mortgage bailout plan, pure and simple. The theme was that the government had gone overboard in it's meddling in the free market system, and what followed was actually a naturally flowing chain of events that eventually spilled over into Town Hall meetings where John and Jane Q Public voiced the same concerns about their belief that the federal government had over stepped it's Constitutional authority.

Whether you agree or disagree with what the Tea Party Movement believes, you can not deny the facts regarding how it actually began. Enter Glenn Beck...

Glenn Beck 101

I've been a fan of Glenn beck since his radio days in Tampa Bay Florida, and the truth of the matter is that although Glenn Beck is indeed a true conservative (for lower taxes, limited government and supports a constructionist view of the U.S. Constitution), he is by no means a sock puppet for the GOP. Most of the confusion is the deliberate distortion of facts by liberals who correctly understand Beck to be their political adversary. The problem with that type of thinking is that Beck is anti-liberal and conservative, and not a kool-aid drinking Republican. The difference there being that he often slammed Bush and the GOP for leaning left and abandoning what he felt should have been core Republican principles of Reaganesque conservatism.

Beck grew in popularity because he was speaking to people who already were in line with his vision of what the conservative answer to liberalism should be, and eventually that core following turned into a movement of it's own when he was picked up for TV by Fox News.

The recent vicious and personal attacks on Glenn Beck are a reflection of a misplaced hatred by the left who re-aimed their venom from Bush, who although was no longer a player and increasingly a bad target for said anger, and then went on to the next largest and most effective voice of anti-liberalism in America... Glenn Beck.

Liberals are frustrated for a good reason

I believe that liberals are besides themselves right now because they have convinced themselves that the 2008 Presidential victory of both President Obama and both houses of the United States Congress were a reflection of support of their vision of America, rather than what it really was... anger at both Bush and Republicans who had 8 years to get it right (pardon the pun) and failed to do anything but look like the Democrats that were ejected en-masse in 1994 during the Gingrich revolution - power drunk politicians. The mistake is that they confused a vote against a particular group of politicians, with a vote for their radical left wing agenda.

Add to this the constant abuse of the charge of racism being over-used by Democrats whenever things aren't going as they had hoped, and you can clearly begin to see the crack that naturally followed in their belief system. They are frustrated, but it's because they are besides themselves and unable to accept the aforementioned chain of events that do in fact reflect the reality of the political landscape of America in 2009.

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
2
Chevalier de Pas

I believe that Republicans are in desperation, confined to the South Confederation.  Your story makes me laugh. Republicans are like the Nazis, they have a good propaganda scheme, and Glenn Beck is more a mystic, adept a numerology and symbology than someone serious to worry about.  Elections forecasts does not ever work, I like better the day after the election, the day when you can really listen to people's voice. Actually you may like better a tea party than a election results, don't you?

1
Rodge

When has Glenn Beck ever claimed to not only be a Republican but to even support them?  In many ways he has been harder on the GOP than the Dems.  Keep underestimating Beck, we have no problem with that.  It takes you out of the picture and removes you from the opposition.  By not taking him seriously, you are doing us a favor.

Now, if you want to try and stop him why don't you organize a boycott of his advertisers?  Oh, wait, they tried that, it didn't work.  Never mind.

1
dudebrojunction

Um, Glenn Beck has all but told me not to take him seriously.  By saying he doesn't check facts, he is a comedian not a journalist, etc. why would anyone take him seriously? His 'wall of conspiracies' alone was enough to make me step back and say "wow, people actually believe the things this man says."  The problem with people who label themselves conservatives and everybody else socialist, communists, liberals,  etc. is that they live in some kind of alternate reality where opinions are impervious to truth.  If you yell something loud enough, and with enough rage behind it, it has to be true. Right?

0
lounsbury

I agree. Let's stick to the facts and leave out the personal insults.

0
Bmw139

When you have nothing intelligent to say, hurl insults and hope that you can detract from the facts.  It brings to mind a phrase my dear old grandfather once told me.  Better to shut your mouth and let people think you a fool than to open it and prove them right. 

0
bilbidiobagginso

And when you don't have an adequate comeback to an insult, just claim the other person doesn't have anything intelligent to say and blabber on about "facts." Then, don't mention any facts. In fact, don't argue at all.  By just saying that the other person "doesn't have anything intelligent to say" and that you, unlike him, are full of relevant factual information you have won the argument.  Nevermind stating any one of the multitude of facts that you possess in your oh so impressive knowledge base.

0
AndrewD

And when you don't have an adequate comeback to an insult, just claim the other person doesn't have anything intelligent to say and blabber on about "facts." Then, don't mention any facts. In fact, don't argue at all.  By just saying that the other person "doesn't have anything intelligent to say" and that you, unlike him, are full of relevant factual information, you have won the argument.  Nevermind stating any one of the multitude of facts that you possess in your oh so impressive knowledge base.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

deleted_user_481875
First Flagged at 3:13 PM, Sep 16, 2009 by deleted_user_481875
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (13)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from