NP Rank:
Why would the church interfere with organ donations?
Consent by default
It seems to me that if people were given the right to decide in this matter, the majority would opt to become organ donors.
In such matters, people won’t go out of their way. That is why in the US, you are asked if you wish to be a donor when you get your driver’s license. It is coded on the license.
Now, making harvesting mandatory unless people opt out is a far more aggressive approach. At any rate, it doesn’t seem to be a matter of church business as it is a matter belonging to the people and their government.
“Organ donation: Church in Wales debate on presumed consent
The Archbishop of Wales addresses the meeting inside the Cardiff city centre church
The Church in Wales has staged a public debate to discuss plans to introduce presumed consent rules on organ donation.
Under the Welsh government proposal, everyone in Wales would automatically become a donor unless they opted out.
The Archbishop of Wales, Dr Barry Morgan, has already called for the legislation to be scrapped.
The debate was held at John the Baptist Church in central Cardiff. Official consultation will end on 31 January.
The Reverend Carol Wardman, of the Church in Wales, said: "Most people would be only too happy for their organs to be used for the benefit of someone else after their death.
"But sadly, only about 30% of us join the organ donor register. This is why the Welsh government wants to bring forward legislation to allow organs to be used for transplant unless the deceased has registered an objection.
“The Church in Wales is inviting people to think about the moral and ethical questions too”
The Rev Carol Wardman
"The government's current consultation process focuses on the practicalities of the proposed system. The Church in Wales is inviting people to think about the moral and ethical questions too."
Around 80 people the question and answer session.
The discussion, which aimed to explore the issues from a Christian standpoint, was arranged by the Church in Wales.
BBC Wales' Sara Gibson reports that the meeting heard why Dr Morgan and fellow bishops in Wales disagree with the opt-out model, and instead want the system to remain as it is.
Many in the meeting also did not agree with the notion of "presumed consent" and agreed with Dr Morgan that an organ should be a gift.
However, Martyn Hutchings, from Thornhill, Cardiff, told the meeting that he had been waiting four years for a transplant, and he hoped that the change in legislation would assist people like himself.
In September, Dr Morgan questioned whether it was a legitimate use ofpower by the Welsh government.
He told the church's governing body: "Organ donation surely ought to be a matter of gift and not of duty.
'Faith' questions
"Giving organs is the most generous act of self giving imaginable but it has to be a choice that is freely embraced, not something that the state assumes."
His views were criticised by the chairman of Kidney Wales Foundation, Roy J Thomas, who has agreed to take part in the public debate, as part of the Opt for Life campaign backing the changes.
Mr Thomas said: ""This is a progressive change in the law. A great deal of scaremongering unfortunately materialises as with anything new.
"We have received great support in the lead up and now want to see those who support this change have their voices heard."
Mr Thomas will be joined by the archbishop and the medical director of NHS Wales, Dr Chris Jones at Saturday's debate.
The latest figures show Wales has reached a deceased organ donation rate of 27.7 per million people (pmp), compared to the UK average rate of 16.3 pmp.
It places Wales above many other European countries, including France (23.8 pmp), Italy (21.6 pmp) and Belgium (20.5 pmp), which already has a system of presumed consent, according to figures for 2010.
The proposed change to the law has been backed by organisations such as the British Medical Association, British Heart Foundation, DiabetesUK, British Lung Foundation, the Welsh Kidney Patients Association.”






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
"thirty-aught-six" (not verified)at 12:07 on January 21st, 2012
It is not the business of the State to determine by default that all persons are automatically organ donors and place the responsibility of opting out on the citizen. It is the citizens right to determine for themselves in their own time whether or not they may wish to donate their organs. The "Church" seems to be doing the work to save the rights of the individual over the State to assume those rights. Makes one wonder why you are attacking the "Church"? Do you believe that you are entitled to other peoples organs? That it is the States right to disperse the individuals organs?
at 13:07 on January 21st, 2012
Agreed--yes indeedy.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
"thirty-aught-six" (not verified)at 16:47 on January 21st, 2012
So you agree that the State holds the right over the individual. That our organs are the property of the State. That institutions who depend on these organs have a right to champion such law, but another institution, in this case "the Church", must be kept quiet while these other institutions work their fascist rule over the individual working uncontested to put the State's Rights over our bodies into law.