Why Would UN World Government Be Allowed To Influence America?
There has been a hidden push to deliver the US under the governance of the United Nations. Why?
Around 1996 you may have seen a couple of roadside posters while driving in Dallas on Central Expressway northbound near the Royal Lane exit or driving north on Interstate 35E towards Carollton, Texas. The signs read “United Nations Troops On American Soil?” These ads were sponsored by a Christian organization that was advocating Constitutional law. They were alluding to a number of worrisome legislative moves being made by the Clinton Administration that were allowing United Nations oversight into domestic affairs within the US. There were many disturbing revelations about what lawmakers were doing behind the backs of the American people.
Why would the UN be given jurisdiction over American rivers and waterways? This would be in violation of US domestic laws both state and federal. Why would UN troops be allowed on US soil. I know from interviewing armed services personnel that there were joint training maneuvers coordinated with United Nations forces, not necessarily NATO allies. Why would there be UN oversight concerning American state elections? Since the mid 1990’s a number of Democrat leaders have made proposals to include United Nations monitoring of American elections on state and local levels. This fact was exposed during a Texas representative race prior to the year of 2000 and was even announced on the radio during the course of a campaign ad. Are Americans alarmed by these developments? Apparently not. Why? This is the typical strength of the left and the radicals who are dismantling America’s traditions, the apathy of voters who are uninformed, living in denial, or simply indifferent to the far reaching implications.
Obama has introduced yet another piece of legislation that would allow UN control over domestic affairs within the United States. In a 47 article proposal to the UN Obama has proposed that indigenous peoples (native Americans) should have their formal tribal lands to be restored, protected, repurchased, and for the Indian people to be financially supported according to their needs for education and welfare. This is a typical rights issue that has been used by the United Nations over and over again to politicize rather than effectively deal with the needs of the people. A good example would be how UNICEF began a new priority of rights advocacy of impoverished children they were supposed to feed, clothe, and vaccinate and instead pursued preposterous rights arguments as these children starved to death of diseases. The same would be true for the American Indian.
Legal experts on the Constitutional sovereignty are more worried though about allowing the UN to gain a foothold through US courts to begin the process of eroding the laws within our nation. This would make us vulnerable to international agendas that do not have the best interests of Americans at heart, and would nullify our Constitutional rights. It is specifically against our laws to allow any international law to be applied to US citizens either on the state, local, or federal level. This is why we have a Constitution, Bill Of Rights, and Declaration of Independence, to protect us against such threats to our sovereignty, yet the Democrats are pursuing this destructive strategy against our people and nation. The Obama administration has continually waged a war against American exceptionalism. Even though American individualism and independence is the cornerstone of our liberties and rights, this is not the first time Obama has made overtures to the United Nations concerning oversight over supposed human rights violations.
There can be no realistic way to compensate Native Americans for the violation of treaties and atrocities that were committed against them more than a hundred years ago. It is estimated that 30% of tribal lands were denied them as a result injustices that were never resolved. Many tribes do collect compensation on their reservations from federal funds. Other tribes such as the Choctaws has been very successful in building and constructing casinos in such states as Oklahoma. Still other tribes such as the Utes in New Mexico and Colorado have made profitable windfalls from oil and gas production royalties. These tribes demonstrate a clear and practical method of utilizing one’s own resources (land) and having a business plan in which to enable capitalizing upon means that already exist for them.
Where as Obama wants to donate more economic aid in our current deficit ridden economy, the best course of action would be to provide opportunities based upon job creation and education rather then promoting more dependency on federally disbursed checks that would encourage fraud and apathy. It is obvious Obama’s agenda is ego driven, is directed toward recruiting more votes, and exhibits his typical assault on traditional American institutions.
The United Nations have historically botched nearly every program they have been in charge of administering. Corruption has been rampant in their fund disbursements for supposed humanitarian causes. The United Nations has continually opposed the United States on many of its foreign policies even though the US contributes 22% of all funding that supports the organization and houses its proceedings with a palatial campus. The United Nations are neither sympathetic to the cause of Americans nor do they support us in our policies the world over. For an American president to be asking them to monitor our elections, oversee our laws, or have any say what so ever in our domestic affairs is preposterous and a gross violation of our Constitution.
You need to contact your congressmen and senators to find out who supports the international intervention in US laws and politics, and vote them out in 2012. This must be stopped if you value the future of your country and your children’s lives in this nation.