Will Olbermann’s departure mean return of Journalistic neutrality

by YankeeJim | January 22, 2011 at 05:59 am
147 views | 0 Recommendations | 10 comments

Photos

Miss you Tom

Miss you Tom

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

Will Olbermann’s departure mean return of Journalistic neutrality and objectivity?

I like Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews too. They are liberals. Should journalists with liberal and conservative biases have their own programs classified as “news?” I don’t think so. Then there is Ed Schultz, a knock off, and a poor one at that.

Keith was thoughtful and provocative and entertaining. He’s a smart guy, but his sports jock background doesn’t match.

Chris Matthews, on the other hand, has academic and professional qualifications that are suited for biased political news commentary.

Yet, as Tom Brockaw lamented, where is objective and professional news reporting – the unbiased type? Where is civil debate and discussion? That is what we are looking for?

“Breaking News Alert: MSNBC, Olbermann parting ways
January 21, 2011 9:09:18 PM

MSNBC announced Friday night that it and provocative liberal talk-show host Keith Olbermann "have ended their contract." Olbermann announced at the end of his "Countdown" that it would be his final appearance. No reason for the split was given by either party.”

If Keith doesn't come back, he will be remembered for splendid rants.

Brockaw says journalism can be saved.

Brokaw: Journalism can be saved

By Sarah Scott

Contributing Reporter

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Journalism will survive the significant challenges it faces only if it succeeds in engaging and empowering readers and viewers, NBC News special correspondent Tom Brokaw said Tuesday.

Before a packed auditorium in the Whitney Humanities Center, Brokaw argued that new forms of journalism hold great promise but that they must be used thoughtfully. Journalists need to be more proactive in promoting journalism as a vital part of society, he said.

“For too long we have talked and you the viewers have listened, we wrote and you read,” Brokaw said. “Now [the media] needs to engage readers and viewers in the future of journalism … The new viewer is empowered as never before to satisfy his needs and curiosity.”

Before addressing the future of journalism, Brokaw recalled the power of network television news to bring people across the country together. Still, he acknowledged the limits of journalism’s prior generation, including a failure to cover gender issues, the health sciences and Asia.

Today, he said, the world faces a starkly different problem. Rather than having a relative scarcity of informed coverage, consumers of media can now pick and choose information from countless news sources, including network television, newspapers and the Internet.

“Does this new reality of television represent a step forward, or is it simply a retreat to the lowest common denominator of common interest and exploitation?” Brokaw asked. “The answer: all of the above.”

Brokaw challenged the audience to take an active part in the modern wave of journalism by choosing its news sources carefully and being wary of misinformation that may appear in the unfiltered media.

While journalism is alive, Brokaw said, it is on “life support.” But he said he sees promise in collectives of investigative journalists who sell their work to newspapers, television networks and Web sites. These transactions make the news more reliable and assist viewers in making informed decisions, he said, while also providing a sustainable financial model for journalism.

The four students interviewed said the talk brought out the tensions created by new technology and ways of getting information.

“The benefits of new technology in the journalism industry are striking, but it is clear from Mr. Brokaw we need to be cautious, careful and innovative in our business models,” Peggy Liu ’11 said.

Rachel Styer ’12, however, said she had difficulty connecting on a personal level with Brokaw’s experiences.

“His talk was insightful, but I wish he were more relatable,” Styer said. “His anecdotes seemed to be from another era of journalism, and I couldn’t really relate to some of the issues he was trying to convey.”

Over the course of his 47-year career, Brokaw has served as anchor of “NBC Nightly News” and “Today.” He has also made 25 documentaries on a variety of subjects, including Watergate and global warming.”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Scrivener

This public takedown telegraphs what's to come for any mainstream media TV type who fails to tow the line.  The countdown to Rachel Maddow's untimely departure, along with Ed Shultz, is on. 

O'Donnell and Mathews will survive because they know how to blow with the wind, but MSNBC's strong second-place ranking among cable nets has been delivered a fatal blow; its core viewership can see right through this. 

Is Comcast's plan to save NBC by destroying it?  Is Comcast president Burke really Lt. Calley in disguise?  Comcast wants to make no waves as it turns all TV into pay TV.  Ruining MSNBC is all part of the plan, perhaps.

 Predictably, many of Keith's colleagues are buying the slander that this is about his "mercurial personality" and not about a purge of American society engineered by dark forces among the power elite. 'No connection to the Comcast takeover," the apparachik intone.  That's like saying, "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain." 

Could K.O.'s firing be a portent of a larger, more disturbing trend?

nowpublic.com/world/rule-law-morality-die-usa-fusion-center-slow-kill-genocide

0
YankeeJim

Rachel Maddow is the smart one. I would have preferred that she pick objective journalism as her mark. She will always be employed in a significant capacity.

1
Letemhang

In a US court ruling, a judge ruled the news agencies had no legal obligation to tell the truth. Kind of opens the door to all kinds of illegitimate reporting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZkDikRLQrw       Move cursor to 10:30 if you don't want to watch full video.

1
YankeeJim

Unless, of course, they advertise that they guarantee the truth. Then there is warranty claim. 

1
Letemhang

Won't be seeing that for quite some time.

0
YankeeJim

There are several Olbermann stories posted today. Some serious, some factual. some not. I am watching to see which ones win the highest NP readership.

1
Scrivener

Olbermann's show never was advertised as "news" but as commentary on the news. 


Rachel Maddow is "safe" because she's naive, which Keith is not.

So now you thinly veiled psy ops agents want a "Ministry of Truth?"  Who decides what is "truth?"  Hey, frat boy Nazis, the book "1984" isn't the prescription, it's the DISEASE! 

Is THIS why Anschutz bought NowPublic?  It's getting very creepy around here...  but at least you guys are transparent, so thanks for that.


0
YankeeJim

I like you best when you are not wearing your straight jacket.

1
Scrivener

Jim:  Thanks for confirming what I already knew by intuition! You guys are hard-wired to insult and degrade -- again, thanks for the transparency!

KEITH O. FANS:  BOYCOTT COMCAST-XFINITY

Perhaps the most immediate remedy to corporate media abuse of power would be a boycott of Comcast/Xfinity cable/telco services in favor of other providers. Money talks, and in a consumer economy, information consumers must vote with their wallets and pocketbooks.

0
YankeeJim

I am on board with nixing Comcast-Xfinity. Xfinity, is that supposed be a play on infinity as in forever failing to provide quality service?

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from