Winona, MN Accused Judge Says One Thing, Evidence Another

by Standtall | October 5, 2009 at 05:50 am
4661 views | 66 Recommendations | 5 comments

Videos

Rick Lubinski, Susan Gallas, Perjury - You Judge, Trial Recorded

see larger video

sourced by Standtall

Rick Lubinski, Susan Gallas, Perjury - You Judge, Trial Recorded

Photos

Winona MN Court Bias, Perjury, Cover Up

Winona MN Court Bias, Perjury, Cover Up

see larger image

uploaded by Standtall

Judge James A. Fabian in his final order issued September 29, 2009 places perjury as a new argument even though perjury was submitted in a one-hundred and twenty-one page document titled: NEW FINDING [PERJURY] May 12, 2008 and Judge Fabian had not taken this case under advisement until May 20, 2008 as both are listed on the docket ledger. This case started off with Judge Fabian stating that his mother’s house had asbestos and lead and she is eight-nine-years-old and then pressuring the Bourne’s with his ‘bias’ “Why not just sell the house and get it over with.”  The Bourne’s had concerns over Rick Lubinski’s and Susan Gallas’ honesty addressing the hazardous asbestos and lead paint.  In the end with this final order issued September 29, 2009 Judge Fabian has approved the sale of this home. He is allowing the perjured belief that the 400 square feet of asbestos flooring has been removed and the house is safe. He is making the Bourne’s pay all costs and attorney fees thus rewarding Rick Lubinski’s and Susan Gallas’ apparent perjury with a large money windfall from this now completed and finalized home sale.  Thousands of Minnesotans have expressed outrage and anger over this Judge’s actions and are voicing strong opinions demanding the removal of Judge Fabian.












recommend Add a comment
3
Ken Potts

A federal rights violations seven figure lawsuit is the best answer for the Bourne's. Winona, MN Judge James A. Fabian obviously has not read the Bill of Rights.

0
Bonnie Blair

The Bournes should file a seven figure federal lawsuit for these extreme rights vioations. Has this Judge even read the U.S. Constituiton?

0
Susan Mills

The essence of a 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 claim is to authorize a court to grant relief when a party's federally protected rights have been violated by a state or local official or other person who acted under color of state law. See United States Supreme Court

1
Mary T. Moore

I think the Bournes may want to see a constitution law attorney. This Judge is disgusting!!

0
Susan Starr

This is the most disgusting act by any judge that I have EVER heard of!!!!

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 5:54 AM, Oct 5, 2009 by Anonymous (not verified)
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (66)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from