NP Rank:
World Fertilty Rates by Country - Rise and Decline of Cultures
Why is fertility rate important?Fertility rate is, basically, the number of children that the average woman will have in her lifetime.
If the average woman has exactly two children in her lifetime, this is just enough to replace herself and one man, and thus maintain the population.
Ultimately, this is the only thing that matters in determining long-term population growth. If the average woman has two children, then the number of people in the next generation will be the same as the number of people in this generation. You often hear people say that improved diet or medicene or other things that cause people to live longer cause population to grow, or that wars or other disasters cause population to shrink. But this is only true indirectly: only if it changes the number of children that the average woman has in her lifetime. That is, if many women die while still young, they may not live long enough to have all the children that they otherwise might have had. But beyond that, how long people live doesn't matter. Everybody still dies sooner or later. If a war wipes out a large number of people, this causes an immediate drop in the population, of course. For the time that the war lasts population growth becomes negative. But once the war is over, if the number of children per woman is the same, the old population growth rate will immediately resume. There is a temporary change in the total numbers, but the rate of growth does not change.
NowPublic on Facebook
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
CynicalPatriot
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Recommendations (13)
-
mudricky
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan 
Anonymous user




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 04:11 on May 11th, 2009
Japan has the lowest birthrate in the world, and by some estimates the population of 127 million could half by the year 2050. Conservative estimates put it at 70-80 million. Japan could cease to exist by the end of the century.
The problem is, Japan has a growing aging pop, and with less people working there comes a point when not enough taxes are being collected to support the aging pop.
Of cause, the problem could be solved by allowing more foreign workers and by the year 2050, Japan will need about 30 million foreign workers, which currently stand at about 2.5 million. Most Japanese would be unable to accept such a large number of foreigners.
at 04:23 on May 11th, 2009
The whole declining fertility debate is bogus: the world has more than enough people and many places are exploding with people. For wealthy countries, the solution is not to just import all those people exploding out of the developing world, but to instead create policies that will be supportive to people having families. The rise of insecure employment and low pay for men, are the reasons why people are not having babies. As for Japan, fewer people is not a problem: the island is very crowded as is. The Japanese are smart enough to use robots and other technology to produce the same number of goods with fewer people. The idea they need to import millions of people to work whiping old bottoms and spoon feeding the elderly is bogus. How many strong young males from the developing world want to do that as job? Get real!