is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
All the world does not get tired of propaganda against what is dubbed as Islamic extremism but when it comes to any other faith it is simply ignored. Was it not Hindu extremism or terrorism when some Hindu fundamentlaist elements beat up a prominent Pakistani television and stage actor Shakeel Siddiqui in Mumbai on Wednesday?
A prominent Pakistan’s television and stage actor Shakeel Siddiqui was beaten up by some Indian fundamentalist elements in Mumbai on Wednesday, Geo T.V reported.
Famous comedian Shakeel was expected to perform in the famous show ‘Comedy Circus’. For that purpose he was staying in Mumbai, but it seems a group of thugs belonging to Nationalist/ fundamentalist Indian mindset has badly beaten the terrific comedian.
At the moment it seems a horrible news, as Shakeel has been a famous person in India and was a source of bringing joy to million of faces all across the sub-continent.
It will be interesting to see how this story unfolds and how it would affect the media relations between both the countries. Ghajini is just released in Pakistan after a slight delay and this horrific news is going to further affect the constant deteriorating situation between the two nuclear Nations.
Anonymous user
archita
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Amaad
somewhere in, Pakistan
Heritage
Taipei, Taiwan
Amitjha
new delhi, India
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (39)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Sanjay Jhaat 02:22 on January 15th, 2009
Hi Hussain, Thanks very much for your post and this incident is certainly deplorable and as an Indian i feel very queasy about such incident. Nobody has any right to beat up any Pakistani artist. He is a good artist and has made a name for his work. But please don't associate this incident with any kind of act of Hindu extremism.
at 02:55 on January 15th, 2009
I appreciate your sentiments about the incident. However, as far as association of the incident with the Hindu extremism is concerned, if there can be Muslim or Islamic extremism, why should not I associate it with Hindu extremism?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
krishnakumar 21 (not verified)at 09:16 on March 30th, 2009
Are U true Indian?
Obviously not!!!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Alvi aka Arc (not verified)at 03:40 on June 21st, 2009
Does being a true Indian mean one should ignore the disturbing facts regarding India and its Hindu majority?
I am sure if an Indian actor was beaten up in Pakistan, from CNN to BBC, every news channel would have reported it as "another act of Islamic extremism". I am sure the religion itself doesnt teach Hindus to do what they did to this actor, but neither does Islam teach violence to Taliban. If they can be used to blame Islam, these extremists can well be used to blame Hinduism too.
at 02:35 on January 15th, 2009
It is sad that we still have extremism from all sides of Humanity. We need to look be on this and realize that it has nothing to do with race, religion, ethnicity or culture rather with a great malaise with in human nature that keeps on reapering with poverty, injustice, fear, misconceptions, intolerance and stresses on the fabric of society such as hunger, unemployment, over population hopelessness.
at 02:53 on January 15th, 2009
the word extremism is all about extreme of any 'ism'.So there will be no solution until this 'ism' is eliminated.we humans have lost our sense of understanding without any prejudice.And this correlation of simple crime with Hinduism is just manifestation of that.
at 02:58 on January 15th, 2009
Amit, you are right but when any Muslim commits a crime, instead of himself the whole world starts maligning Islam so why not other faiths? Whether you agree or not, it is a fact that extremism exists in all socities and in followers of all faiths be they Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Jews, etc. Is Mr Bal Thackeray not Hindu extremist?
at 03:04 on January 15th, 2009
he is simply a criminal.....and a criminal of any nature cannot be religious.Whether hindu or muslim, we all just a puppet in there hands, and they play with the emotion as they want.
All we need is, to develop undestanding that any religion cannot teach violence.It is just a weapon in the hands of politicians to justify there mideeds by taking shelter of religion.
at 03:21 on January 15th, 2009
Amit, had it been between you and me, we might have developed that understanding but in the existing circumstances it seems simply impossible. Have you noted that David Miliband has stated "war on terror" was "misleading and mistaken". What does it mean after killing thousands of innocent people in this useless war. Even if you and me ignore Kashmir to reach an understanding, what happened in Iraq, Afghanistan and now happening in Gaza? Is it not going to deepen the religious divide? It would certainly further divide humans on religious grounds.
Source: thenews.com.pk
If you ask Mr Bush and other people like him, they would not hesitate to defend this barbarism. So how can we expect an end to wars and violence, etc.
at 03:55 on January 15th, 2009
you are right, but this way we will destroy every thing in the name of relegion.Why so much hatred against Islam, is there any specific reason behind it?
at 04:06 on January 15th, 2009
The reason is in part Fear, because Islam is the fastest growing religion in the World today.
at 04:13 on January 15th, 2009
so Paschen , you are saying , the problem is all about the islamic globalisation, in cultural sense.
at 05:04 on January 15th, 2009
The Problem is in part the fear of becoming a minority simply due to the fact that Islam is demographically expending where as others are decreasing in numbers, the four growing population in the world today are Moslem, Hindu and Chinese as well as African. Where as the rest that do maintain the power today are being out numbered soon and they do fear for there status and place in the World and are in part the source of this paranoia. Until Today the Largest Populace Globally was Christian and yet now they are equated by Moslems and soon the largest Population Globally will be Moslem even in Europe by 2050, 35% of all European will be Moslem. It is a change and people are always scared of changes and some times demonize those changes. Yet we all have the same red blood and we all care and cherish the same things, such as family and peace.
at 04:40 on January 15th, 2009
There is more to it than what meets the eyes .When Jewish extremist became a big threat the west carved them a place called Israel as even today they are scared of the white jews making a come back .Just have a look at the map of Israel as to how is it cushioned by water tight territory by Islamic population on all sides.
While the west women have gone sterile the population of Islamist has been ever increasing and with liberal immigration policy the west and the UK are all waking to the factors of mini arab world ghettos in their midst which is scary as they have no control on who are members of extremist and who are moderates.
Victims of terror become future perpetrators
The strange atrocities on the islamic world and the blunders like the Iraq war has resulted in animosity that cannot be contained .In the absence of the Jews the equation with Islam which existed historical with the Christians and the Arab world started expanding into other continents as well untill no continent is spared from it.
In the insecurity and fear of being attacked within their own country and the palestine kind of situation spilling over in their own soil they have become paranoid with Islam and muslims branding the religion and the people of that faith as extremism.
While terrorism exists in all sections today including buddism,Christians,Hindus etc the most feared terror elements are Islamic and LTTE as they are highly organised and sophisticated .
They can deliver what they can say at will, any where. So the world has reason to fear them and hate them
Secular thinking today is considered increasingly a weakness.
I really shudder to think if the world has been so devasted by terror in last 20 year then what will be that our children have to face in next 20 years as there is no sight of this situation changing for the better .
at 07:30 on January 15th, 2009
Paschen, you are correct. The fear of Islam's growth has been growing with every passing day for the last 1400 years.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
MindItMurugan (not verified)at 16:14 on August 12th, 2009
Shows that literaryGuru post at the bottom of the page ..has pint sized brain withe a totally closed mind.. see many people today are accpeting the right path...and for all the hateful propoganda against the faith of God, there are ever increasing people coming to its fold with conviction and their own will...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i1oMxKcydc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25-o9OYrrVU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfzsNoPAh_w&feature=related
It is amazing to see how many non-muslims would blindly post the verses from Quran, without even reading from 'appropriate' and well-know translations. Needless to say they hardly ever know the context. In this article we will be examining commonly quoted verses on the topic of violence and refuting them. This article is divided in 3 parts:
1) Refuting commonly quoted verses on the topic of violence
2) Exposing the hypocrisy of Jews and Christians
3) Providing accurate picture of Islam
1)Refuting commonly quoted verses on the topic of violence
9:5
Islam-critics only post 9:5:
"Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." (PICKTHAL Translation, Quran 9:5)
Let's read the verse in context 9:1-9:5:
Freedom from obligation (is proclaimed) from Allah and His messenger toward those of the idolaters with whom ye made a treaty. Travel freely in the land four months, and know that ye cannot escape Allah and that Allah will confound the disbelievers (in His Guidance). And a proclamation from Allah and His messenger to all men on the day of the Greater Pilgrimage that Allah is free from obligation to the idolaters, and (so is) His messenger. So, if ye repent, it will be better for you; but if ye are averse, then know that ye cannot escape Allah. Give tidings (O Muhammad) of a painful doom to those who disbelieve, Excepting those of the idolaters with whom ye (Muslims) have a treaty, and who have since abated nothing of your right nor have supported anyone against you. (As for these), fulfil their treaty to them till their term. Lo! Allah loveth those who keep their duty (unto Him). Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. (PICKTHAL Translation, Quran 9:1-5)
This verses is always quoted out of context, they never post 9:6 or from 9:1 to 9:6. If we read from start it states that there was a treaty, which the Pagans of Arab broke. Thus Allah gave them 4 months as 9:2 states in order to amend the treaty. Verse 9:4 states that the punishment prescribed in 9:5 is ONLY to those who broke the treaty and NOT to those who abided by the treaty. Therefore the context of 9:5 is of war with the pagan Arabs who broke the treaty yet refused to amend it in 4 months.
Naturally, in war violence is expected. If a war is declared between Country A and Country B, because country B broke the treaty and refused to amend, then if president of country A states "wherever you find soldiers of Country B, you kill them and besiege them", no one would truly find much wrong in that statement.
Killing in war is nothing peculiar, and there is yet to be a war where soldiers hugged and kissed each other. In additions, Dr. Zakir Naik writes in his book "Replies to the most common questions asked by non-muslims":
"4. Verse 9:5 quoted to boost morale of Muslims during battle
Similarly in Surah Taubah chapter 9 verse 5 the Qur’an says, "Kill the Mushriqs [pagans] where ever you find them", during a battle to boost the morale of the Muslim soldiers. What the Qur’an is telling Muslim soldiers is, don’t be afraid during battle; wherever you find the enemies kill them."
Islam-critics remain shy of posting the next verse, 9:6, as it contains the answer to their deception:
"And if anyone of the idolaters seeketh thy protection (O Muhammad), then protect him so that he may hear the Word of Allah, and afterward convey him to his place of safety. That is because they are a folk who know not. (PICKTHAL Translation, Quran 9:6)
Quran does not only say that you release those who seek protection but it goes even further and states to protect them! In the present international scenario, even a kind, peace-loving army General, during a battle, may let the enemy soldiers go free, if they want peace. But which army General will ever tell his soldiers, that if the enemy soldiers want peace during a battle, don’t just let them go free, but also escort them to a place of security?
By the way, Hindu scriptures like Ramayana and Mahabharat are full of violence related incidents..same with Bible.. does this mean Hinduism, Christianity preach violence??
at 06:20 on January 15th, 2009
"...........Even if you and me ignore Kashmir to reach an understanding, what happened in Iraq, Afghanistan and now happening in Gaza? Is it not going to deepen the religious divide? It would certainly further divide humans on religious grounds......"
Hehehehehe....I could not stop laughing.
First of all I congratulate hussain for forcing me to comment on this article and earning 3 NP points. Way to go....
Now about comment. What had happened between Iran - Iraq and Iraq - Kuwait? Oh well...those wars fought either for leisure or ensuring "religious harmony", right ?. How many people got killed in those wars? Any idea? So from your highly charged article it is evident that if muslim countries war on each other, nobody need to make the kind of noises. But if a non - muslim ( what is the word ..? oh..kaffir ) country is on war with a muslim country and then you look at the number of - mujahideen" or "shaheed " casualities , conveniently ignoring the dead "kaffirs". Now who is deviding people on relegious grounds?
Now..
"Was it not Hindu extremism or terrorism when some Hindu fundamentlaist elements beat up a prominent Pakistani television and stage actor Shakeel Siddiqui in Mumbai on Wednesday? "
What happened in this case was wrong, no denial about it . But if you shout that this is "Hindu Fundamentalism" then me too can shout that " this is a stupid comment, it is just a roadside burglary". How about that ?
Have you ever heard how many Indian diplomats got beaten up in Pakistan?
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2000/01/17/stories/0117000b.htm
Here is one of those stories. Similarly Pakistan also complain that their diplomats gets beaten up in India. Thing like this happen all the times. But it is really funny when you say it is "Hindu Fundamentalism" is behind such petti violence. It is a blatant lie and I know even you dont believe this.
Your comment ..
"if there can be Muslim or Islamic extremism, why should not I associate it with Hindu extremism? "
.....says it all. India has Prithvi Missile , pak has ghori missile (Ghori was a muslim king who killed Prithviraj ,a hindu king) . When India conducted their nuclear test, immediately pak conducted their own test and thus re-ignited relegious frency across many countries. India has Kashmir issue, pak has Baluch issue.
I dont blame you if you feel bad that India not having any fundamentalism of her own. So you just gifted her a "fundamentalism".
Thank you very much for that contribution.Much appreciated.
Agent.
at 07:02 on January 15th, 2009
what about the destruction or Babaris Mosque? what about the killing of thousand of Muslims in Gujrat after the train desaster? what about the rath Yatra from India to Kashmir by BJP? is that not Hindu fanaticism or fundamantalism? give your arse a rest and stop talking out of it.
at 07:32 on January 15th, 2009
Destruction of Babri Masjid. A stupid act by the Hindus.Nothing achieved by that. But that was nothing comparing to the Mumbai attack in which Islamic terrorists provided military training for one year and advanced weapons to maniacs and send them to "another" country to kill people. In the same note, how about destruction of Baamian Buddha statues ?
About Gujarat , another wrong doing by Hindus. But here also look at what was the trigger behind that. Railway coaches were set fire by one community killing 58 people including women and children and other community retaliated. These are not activitites well planned and masterminded by ruthless terrorists.
What about rath yatra? It was within India. It was like Pakistan Punjabis and Sindhis testing their nuclear weapons in Baluchistan.
"give your arse a rest and stop talking out of it."
Sorry, I am a human being and my physical pecularities does not permit me to talk through that particular part of my anatomy - unlike you. So you just demonstrate how to start and stop talking , the way you do.. Maybe you can upload a clip to youtube. Animal planet people may get interested in it.
Go here to do that .http://www.youtube.com
Agent.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
IndianMuslim (not verified)at 15:28 on August 12th, 2009
Agent or shall I say Bhadwa..
To all the atrocities perpetrated by Hindu fanatics, you simple say its wrong.. NO... there has been systematic genocide in Gujrat and all the inquiry commissions could not prove that it was Muslims who set the train on fire... though there was a fight between Muslims and Hindus near Godhra after many karsevaks behaved atrociously towards women and bullied people in the train.. There have been systematic efforts by extremist Hindus to target minorities in India.. given an opportunity they would like to do the final justice with the minorities.. i.e. ethinc cleansing... children are brainwashed since childhood days to hate muslims and other communities.. India is on a terrible path unfortunately due to the indifference of the majority Hindus towards this problem..for centuries the lowe caste hindus were oppressed now it seems they have found Muslims, christians as the scapegoats.. shame is that this happens in a so-called secular democratic country..Hopefully, all good Indians will come forward to save India from the extremists and make it a livable place for people of all races and religions..
at 07:37 on January 15th, 2009
israeli.agent, I don't consider your diatribe in the garb of a comment worth counter-comment for you being an Israeli agent as is evident from your nick.
at 07:41 on January 15th, 2009
Fine. But, is "this" comment posted by you ?
Agent.
at 09:03 on January 15th, 2009
This conversation is not good at all! We must see the journalist code of ethics....
My friends! "We all believe in one God... We are meeting here today to say that religions should be a means to iron out differences and not to lead to disputes," King Abdullah said, in an inaugural speech at the three-day World Conference on Dialouge (Wed. July16, 2008). "My brothers, we must tell the world that differences don't need to lead disputes," "The tragedies we have experienced throughout history were not the fault of religion, but because of the extremism that has been adopted by some followers of all the religions." He added, ...speaking to more than 300 people of different faiths rose as one to applauded King Abdullah after he called for a 'constuctive dialogue'. to open a new page to reconcillation after so many disputes.... To succeed we must emphasize the common link between us which is a belief in God.
This is one of my favourite... dialogue.
By the way I'm a Roman Catholic! (I'm on neutral side) Thanks everyone! :D
at 15:04 on August 12th, 2009
Believing in antiquated fables about gods is what got us into this mess.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
IndianMuslim (not verified)at 16:17 on August 12th, 2009
literaryguru, Shows that you have pint sized brain and you have a totally closed mind to quote Quran verses in the wrong context.. see many people today are accpeting the right path...and for all the hateful propoganda against the faith of God, there are ever increasing people coming to its fold with conviction and their own will...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i1oMxKcydc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25-o9OYrrVU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfzsNoPAh_w&feature=related
It is amazing to see how many non-muslims would blindly post the verses from Quran, without even reading from 'appropriate' and well-know translations. Needless to say they hardly ever know the context. In this article we will be examining commonly quoted verses on the topic of violence and refuting them. This article is divided in 3 parts:
1) Refuting commonly quoted verses on the topic of violence
2) Exposing the hypocrisy of Jews and Christians
3) Providing accurate picture of Islam
1)Refuting commonly quoted verses on the topic of violence
9:5
Islam-critics only post 9:5:
"Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." (PICKTHAL Translation, Quran 9:5)
Let's read the verse in context 9:1-9:5:
Freedom from obligation (is proclaimed) from Allah and His messenger toward those of the idolaters with whom ye made a treaty. Travel freely in the land four months, and know that ye cannot escape Allah and that Allah will confound the disbelievers (in His Guidance). And a proclamation from Allah and His messenger to all men on the day of the Greater Pilgrimage that Allah is free from obligation to the idolaters, and (so is) His messenger. So, if ye repent, it will be better for you; but if ye are averse, then know that ye cannot escape Allah. Give tidings (O Muhammad) of a painful doom to those who disbelieve, Excepting those of the idolaters with whom ye (Muslims) have a treaty, and who have since abated nothing of your right nor have supported anyone against you. (As for these), fulfil their treaty to them till their term. Lo! Allah loveth those who keep their duty (unto Him). Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. (PICKTHAL Translation, Quran 9:1-5)
This verses is always quoted out of context, they never post 9:6 or from 9:1 to 9:6. If we read from start it states that there was a treaty, which the Pagans of Arab broke. Thus Allah gave them 4 months as 9:2 states in order to amend the treaty. Verse 9:4 states that the punishment prescribed in 9:5 is ONLY to those who broke the treaty and NOT to those who abided by the treaty. Therefore the context of 9:5 is of war with the pagan Arabs who broke the treaty yet refused to amend it in 4 months.
Naturally, in war violence is expected. If a war is declared between Country A and Country B, because country B broke the treaty and refused to amend, then if president of country A states "wherever you find soldiers of Country B, you kill them and besiege them", no one would truly find much wrong in that statement.
Killing in war is nothing peculiar, and there is yet to be a war where soldiers hugged and kissed each other. In additions, Dr. Zakir Naik writes in his book "Replies to the most common questions asked by non-muslims":
"4. Verse 9:5 quoted to boost morale of Muslims during battle
Similarly in Surah Taubah chapter 9 verse 5 the Qur’an says, "Kill the Mushriqs [pagans] where ever you find them", during a battle to boost the morale of the Muslim soldiers. What the Qur’an is telling Muslim soldiers is, don’t be afraid during battle; wherever you find the enemies kill them."
Islam-critics remain shy of posting the next verse, 9:6, as it contains the answer to their deception:
"And if anyone of the idolaters seeketh thy protection (O Muhammad), then protect him so that he may hear the Word of Allah, and afterward convey him to his place of safety. That is because they are a folk who know not. (PICKTHAL Translation, Quran 9:6)
Quran does not only say that you release those who seek protection but it goes even further and states to protect them! In the present international scenario, even a kind, peace-loving army General, during a battle, may let the enemy soldiers go free, if they want peace. But which army General will ever tell his soldiers, that if the enemy soldiers want peace during a battle, don’t just let them go free, but also escort them to a place of security?
Hence even in war Quran promotes peace.
2:191
Islam-critics usually apply "cut and choose" approach with regards to this verse. They only quote: "And slay them wherever ye catch them…" (2:191). However, let us be brave enough to read the whole passage in context from 2:190-195:
Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loves not transgressors. And kill them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for persecution and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, kill them. Such is the reward of those who reject faith. But if they cease, God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God; but if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression. The prohibited month, for the prohibited month, and so for all things prohibited, there is the law of equality. If then any one transgresses the prohibition against you, transgress ye likewise against him. But fear (the punishment of) God, and know that God is with those who restrain themselves. And spend of your substance in the cause of Allah, and make not your own hands contribute to (your) destruction; but do good; for Allah loveth those who do good. (YUSUF ALI, Quran 2:190-195)
The verse clearly states to fight those who fight you, yet do not transgress limits. In so sense therefore does it promote killing of innocent but allows self-defence. It further goes on to state "And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice" and "if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression". Hence, once again when the whole context is examined the verses does not promote killing of innocent in anyway.
Abdul Majid Daryabadi (Finlay, Greece Under the Romans, pp. 367-368) writes on verse 2:190:
"...Violating the truce they themselves had signed. The Muslims, after having borne untold persecution with almost superhuman fortitude for years and years at the hands of the pagans of Makkah, are now for the first time enjoined to take to reprisals. ‘For a full thirteen years the Muslims were subjected to relentless persecution in Mecca. The Prophet and his followers fled for life to Medina, but the enemy would not leave them alone in their refuge. They came to attack them within a year, and the first three battles were fought in the very locality which will whether the Prophet was an assailant or defendant’ (Headley, The Original Church of Jesus Christ and Islam, p. 155). The Makkans had signed a truce and were the first to break it..."
Once again when the whole context is examined the verses does not promote killing of innocents, whether muslims or non-muslims in anyway, but only self-defence.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
MazherIndian (not verified)at 16:20 on August 12th, 2009
literaryguru, Shows that you have pint sized brain and you have a totally closed mind to quote Quran verses in the wrong context.. see many people today are accpeting the right path...and for all the hateful propoganda against the faith of God, there are ever increasing people coming to its fold with conviction and their own will...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i1oMxKcydc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25-o9OYrrVU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfzsNoPAh_w&feature=related
It is amazing to see how many non-muslims would blindly post the verses from Quran, without even reading from 'appropriate' and well-know translations. Needless to say they hardly ever know the context. In this article we will be examining commonly quoted verses on the topic of violence and refuting them. This article is divided in 3 parts:
1) Refuting commonly quoted verses on the topic of violence
2) Exposing the hypocrisy of Jews and Christians
3) Providing accurate picture of Islam
1)Refuting commonly quoted verses on the topic of violence
9:5
Islam-critics only post 9:5:
"Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." (PICKTHAL Translation, Quran 9:5)
Let's read the verse in context 9:1-9:5:
Freedom from obligation (is proclaimed) from Allah and His messenger toward those of the idolaters with whom ye made a treaty. Travel freely in the land four months, and know that ye cannot escape Allah and that Allah will confound the disbelievers (in His Guidance). And a proclamation from Allah and His messenger to all men on the day of the Greater Pilgrimage that Allah is free from obligation to the idolaters, and (so is) His messenger. So, if ye repent, it will be better for you; but if ye are averse, then know that ye cannot escape Allah. Give tidings (O Muhammad) of a painful doom to those who disbelieve, Excepting those of the idolaters with whom ye (Muslims) have a treaty, and who have since abated nothing of your right nor have supported anyone against you. (As for these), fulfil their treaty to them till their term. Lo! Allah loveth those who keep their duty (unto Him). Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. (PICKTHAL Translation, Quran 9:1-5)
This verses is always quoted out of context, they never post 9:6 or from 9:1 to 9:6. If we read from start it states that there was a treaty, which the Pagans of Arab broke. Thus Allah gave them 4 months as 9:2 states in order to amend the treaty. Verse 9:4 states that the punishment prescribed in 9:5 is ONLY to those who broke the treaty and NOT to those who abided by the treaty. Therefore the context of 9:5 is of war with the pagan Arabs who broke the treaty yet refused to amend it in 4 months.
Naturally, in war violence is expected. If a war is declared between Country A and Country B, because country B broke the treaty and refused to amend, then if president of country A states "wherever you find soldiers of Country B, you kill them and besiege them", no one would truly find much wrong in that statement.
Killing in war is nothing peculiar, and there is yet to be a war where soldiers hugged and kissed each other. In additions, Dr. Zakir Naik writes in his book "Replies to the most common questions asked by non-muslims":
"4. Verse 9:5 quoted to boost morale of Muslims during battle
Similarly in Surah Taubah chapter 9 verse 5 the Qur’an says, "Kill the Mushriqs [pagans] where ever you find them", during a battle to boost the morale of the Muslim soldiers. What the Qur’an is telling Muslim soldiers is, don’t be afraid during battle; wherever you find the enemies kill them."
Islam-critics remain shy of posting the next verse, 9:6, as it contains the answer to their deception:
"And if anyone of the idolaters seeketh thy protection (O Muhammad), then protect him so that he may hear the Word of Allah, and afterward convey him to his place of safety. That is because they are a folk who know not. (PICKTHAL Translation, Quran 9:6)
Quran does not only say that you release those who seek protection but it goes even further and states to protect them! In the present international scenario, even a kind, peace-loving army General, during a battle, may let the enemy soldiers go free, if they want peace. But which army General will ever tell his soldiers, that if the enemy soldiers want peace during a battle, don’t just let them go free, but also escort them to a place of security?
Hence even in war Quran promotes peace.
2:191
Islam-critics usually apply "cut and choose" approach with regards to this verse. They only quote: "And slay them wherever ye catch them…" (2:191). However, let us be brave enough to read the whole passage in context from 2:190-195:
Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loves not transgressors. And kill them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for persecution and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, kill them. Such is the reward of those who reject faith. But if they cease, God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God; but if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression. The prohibited month, for the prohibited month, and so for all things prohibited, there is the law of equality. If then any one transgresses the prohibition against you, transgress ye likewise against him. But fear (the punishment of) God, and know that God is with those who restrain themselves. And spend of your substance in the cause of Allah, and make not your own hands contribute to (your) destruction; but do good; for Allah loveth those who do good. (YUSUF ALI, Quran 2:190-195)
The verse clearly states to fight those who fight you, yet do not transgress limits. In so sense therefore does it promote killing of innocent but allows self-defence. It further goes on to state "And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice" and "if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression". Hence, once again when the whole context is examined the verses does not promote killing of innocent in anyway.
at 20:16 on August 15th, 2009
My "pint sized brain" has an A+ average in 4th year University. Keep the personal insults to yourself. For a guy who claims to reject violence, your rhetoric hints otherwise.
As for violence inspired by the Koran, one only has to look to Al Qaida. Are you going to tell me they don't know how to read the Koran? They cite it as a justification for violence constantly. Are they reading a different Koran, or, as I believe, the Koran CAN and DOES justify violence depending on how you interpret it. It's designed to be ambiguous enough to justify anything to anybody.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Ali456 (not verified)at 16:41 on August 12th, 2009
Oh...so many Christians are being killed in India by Hindu extremists and you are still neutral!!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
gautam (not verified)at 09:41 on January 15th, 2009
i dont bilive this happens in india .all our prominent actors r muslims whether in hindi or regional languages (remember in hindu dominated area ) if we were fundementalists we will nt allow tat to happen. it may be out burst of angry against pakis who attacked mumbai recently .
at 09:52 on January 15th, 2009
Yeah..
Moreover Indian government do give subsidy to the muslims who are travelling to Hajj pilgrimage. The taxpayer's money. Is there any Muslim dominant country do anything similar to the minorities.
Details.
http://www.indianmuslims.info/reports_about_indian_muslims/hajj_operation_in_india_2006.html
Agent.