NP Rank:
Would candidate Obama approve of President Obama?
Ariana Huffington of Huffington Post ponders David Plouffe's book, and wonders how the Audacity to Win became the Timidity to Govern.
It is a question on the mind of many Democrats, one year after the stunning victory of Barack Obama, the first biracial man to be elected to the office of US President.
Huffington points out that Plouffe stresses what most of us Democrats loved in the campaign: The graceful and swift mechanism of correction and damage control. Why, she wonders - as we do as well - is this mechanism not at work within an Obama White House? It is a question on which Plouffe and Obama have been all too silent.
I had arranged to meet David Plouffe on Saturday afternoon at a Starbucks on Wisconsin Avenue in Washington. The night before, a copy of his new book, The Audacity to Win: The Inside Story and Lessons of Barack Obama's Historic Victory, was waiting for me when I checked into my hotel at midnight. I flipped it open, read a few lines and was hooked. I spent the rest of the night reading it.Plouffe has written the most important political book of the year (for reasons I'll get to in a moment). It's also completely gripping. It reads like a thriller. Even though you know how it ends, you quickly get caught up in every twist and turn of perhaps the most remarkable campaigns in American history.
Along the way, I found myself tearing up when I read about the campaign volunteer who had scrimped and saved ("Grabbed some ramen on the weekends... Didn't take the girl to a movie") so he could donate ten dollars to Obama, and laughed at the funny-in-retrospect tales from the trail (like David Axelrod's BlackBerry crashing at a crucial moment because of glazed donut getting stuck in the trackwheel.)
But it's not the insider look at the past that makes the book so important. It's what it shows us about the present -- and the effect it could have on the future.
Plouffe's book arrives at a crossroads moment for the administration -- exactly one year after the election, and one year before the 2010 midterms. A lot has happened in that year, as the audacity of winning has given way to the timidity of governing. But in recounting how the campaign team -- and the candidate -- not only had the audacity to win but was able to keep that audacity alive, day in and day out over the long nearly-two-year slog of the campaign, Plouffe has also shown the Obama White House the way forward.
The book is a powerful reminder of what the country voted for last year -- and could serve as the trigger for Obama and his team to refocus and remember why the election mattered so much.
Crowd Power
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States
Recommendations (16)
-
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
albertacowpoke
Canada -
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 08:11 on November 3rd, 2009
Remember what Obama looked like trying to bowl? I had the feeling that he is a "klutz". A "klutz", a German-Jewish word, is a person who is uncoordinated. He is not whole. That is what we saw there. Same with the pitch he threw.
The real problem is that he is in over his head. He represented a media culture's take on a reality show version of the "West Wing", a show I could never watch for more than five minutes, if at all.
So, now we have an analysis by the flip-flopping Arianna Huffington, ex-conservative, as unbalanced now as she was then.
I do agree. If you oppose "don't-ask-don't-tell", what takes so long to reverse it?
Arianna and Michelle would both be more effective in implementing a liberal program.
That is because they are "animus-possessed" women, masculinized, driven by the power principle while the men who represent the extreme liberal mindset are "anima-possessed", feminized, and lack the balls to do what has to be done.
These women could never be elected, though. The public reads them as wounded in their capacity to nurture and experiences them as a turn-off.
Obama could be elected. Why? Because Obama was loved as a child, though, of course, neglected by his father. When he beams, he is extremely likable. But, lacking that anchoring of the father, he has the feminine point of view seeded in his psyche to the extent of limiting the complementary point of view.
He is incompletely Machiavellian as a result and can't close the deal. He can't kick the ass of his own party. To do that would be to admit that his idealization of the left was wrong, wrong, wrong.
That would cut off his narcissistic supply and cause a collapse from within.
So, he loses weight, instead, reflecting an incapacity to take in nourishment now. He is treading on thin ice.
at 08:18 on November 3rd, 2009
Very astute analysis there, Roy. Wonder what dear A211 would respond? Yes, your Jungian view is exactly what Peake lacks in the way of social commentary, and these ideas would strengthen his Daemon concept considerably. thanks recommendo
at 16:00 on November 3rd, 2009
SMK: Could it be that Obama is seeking his core of being through his presidency? A core of being that was never established as a result of his trans-continental, bi-racial, and lack-of-a-father-figure upbringing? Obama is indeed unique among all other American presidents in that his formative years were spent in places other than the U.S. mainland. And when he did finally settle on the U.S. mainland, virtually all of his mainland U.S. experience derived from an academic setting.
Source: en.wikipedia.org
at 08:23 on November 3rd, 2009
Thanks.
at 08:28 on November 3rd, 2009
More simply, it seems that Obama is just another politician, and not particularly adroit at that.
at 15:27 on November 3rd, 2009
Hugh: YES! Just another politician to us rubes! HA! But to the more analytically inclined among us he's, apparently, a rather complex individual. I bet Schlomo would have a field day talking to Obama.
at 11:25 on November 3rd, 2009
Hugh, actually, if we want to stop turning in circles, my contention is that we need to be more sophisticated about what is going on psychologically.
Some people can, for example, find a mate and have a good marriage without much introspection or study of what it is all about.
But, some need to come to terms with choice in the area of marriage. I think that picking a politician to vote for, especially when young, is a lot like "falling in love".
We need to stop "falling in love". How to do that?
A good spiritual life is a good start.