"X": The faction that follows George Bush

by Rhonda J Mangus | October 5, 2008 at 02:06 pm
127 views | 16 Recommendations | 11 comments

Photos

The faction that follows George Bush:  "I am X,..."?

The faction that follows George Bush: "I am X,..."?

see larger image

uploaded by Rhonda J Mangus

Is the "right" reducing itself to emotional extremes rather than acting as a movement for political ideas, and can its arguments be reduced to the most rudimentary logical proposition: "I am X, and X is both superior and treated with deep unfairness."?

Glenn Greenwald, an accomplished author and former constitutional law and civil rights litigator in New York City, thinks so.


Go pick whatever right-wing journals or polemicists you want and (with some isolated exceptions) what you will find is this simultaneously self-loving and self-pitying worldview permeating virtually everything they say, think and believe. You can reduce most of their arguments, and all of their group-based drives, to a rudimentary logical proposition: "I am X, and X is both superior and treated with deep unfairness." It doesn't matter what "X" happens to be for any one of them -- conservative, male, Republican, Christian, Jewish, religious, white, Western, American -- that is the formula that expresses how they perceive the world and their role in it.


Petulance and self-pitying grievance is what fuels them. This endless need to self-victimize would be one thing if the groups to which they belonged were small minorities targeted by a hostile and more powerful majority. But the exact opposite is true. By and large, the groups to which they belong (and therefore see as oppressed and treated with unparalleled unfairness) are the most numerous and the most powerful in the country and always have been. Yet still -- nothing is their fault; they face hopeless obstacles imposed by Evil and Omnipotent Forces which hate them; "I am X, and X is both superior and treated with deep unfairness."

They have run the country for the entire decade. For the last 14 years, they've controlled the House for all but 20 months. They spent substantial parts of the last eight years in control of all branches of government simultaneously. They've won 7 out of the last 10 presidential elections. The country's largest and richest corporations -- including the ones owning the most powerful media outlets -- pour money into their party and perceive, correctly, that their interests are served by the Right's agenda. But still -- they can't get a fair shake; everything is deeply oppressive to them; it's all so unfair.

As they've ruled the country, it's been driven into the ground on every level. The President they revered and endlessly glorified is the most unpopular in modern American history. They've ushered in disastrous wars, virtual economic panic, state-sanctioned torture and astonishing debt. Their leaders have been exposed as bloated, corrupted criminals and hypocrites. Their current candidate chose as his Vice President someone who can barely string together a complete sentence or opine on the simplest of matters, and himself acknowledges that he's been joined at the hip with the failed Bush Presidency on virtually all key issues.

But still -- they're about to lose not because of anything they did, but because the corporate-owned Media hates them and is distorting their message; because they're being persecuted for their religion (which more than 75% of Americans share); because they are just weak, kind, good little Davids being hopelessly crushed by the Goliath forces arrayed in a confederacy against them. That they belong to virtually every majority group and wield most power makes no impact on any of that. This kind of self-centered, self-victimizing, self-pitying worldview provides great psychological comfort and a release from any responsibility for one's actions, and so they are highly motivated never to give it up. To the contrary, they'll cling to it -- are clinging to it -- even more desperately as their failures and rejection by the public become more vividly apparent.



recommend This comment thread is now closed
SOLARLIFE
SOLARLIFE
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 14:26 on October 5th, 2008

Rhonda J Mangus, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Hi SOLARLIFE.  I think Greenwald presents a very convincing argument. Thank you for reading and for the Flag.

0
SedulousPleb

I disagree somewhat with this article. I believe the "right" (although a majority) do not control the political agenda but are duped into believing their interests are being met. Let's face it, "rightys" want abortion banned because they feel it is murder because they believe life begins at conception. Roe v. Wade still stands (even after they have had control for 10 years). Homosexual marriage is being demanded and "rightys" feel strongly this is an abandonment of moral values/traditional marriage. The media is on the "left's" side too (except obviously Fox News and the religious channels). Can you name a primetime TV show that says homosexuality is wrong? I can name a dozen shows that "glorify" homosexuality and transgender lifestyles. The right then feels pressured to do something so they pass laws to try to control what they preceive as a moral decline. Which are then overturned by judges as unconstiutional leading to the phrase: "activist judges". The Republicans see this and they use it to their advantage.  I also strongly disagree with the direction all this (i.e. left vs. right)  is going too as it is polarizing our nation and transforming our arguments into meaningless cliches fed to us by political office seekers. Besides, the main premise to this article "I am X, and X is both superior and treated with deep unfairness." can be applied to ANY special interest group.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

SedulousPleb, thank you for reading and for sharing your thoughts.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

zichi, thank you for reading, commenting, and the Flag.

djermano
djermano
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 02:29 on October 6th, 2008

Rhonda J Mangus, I like this story. It's good stuff.

they're about to lose not because of anything they did, but because the corporate-owned Media hates them and is distorting their message; because they're being persecuted for their religion (which more than 75% of Americans share); because they are just weak, kind, good little Davids being hopelessly crushed by the Goliath forces arrayed in a confederacy against them. That they belong to virtually every majority group and wield most power makes no impact on any of that.

Mangus I think the Corporate Media loves them...because the bosses are all tied to Israel.  If anyone is being persecuted for their religion are people like me forced to leave the USA because my religion is against the use of violence...If I work they take tax money to pay the Violent Military Machine....The people who believe in Nonviolence are being persecuted here......and here I thought this article was going to be about a guy named Malcolm...

Rev. Jermano

0
Rhonda J Mangus

djermano, it didn't occur to me that people would think this article could be about Malcolm X. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and for the Flag.

Barry Artiste
Barry Artiste
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:51 on October 6th, 2008

Rhonda J Mangus, I like this story. It's good stuff.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Barry, thank you for reading and for the Flag.

rumana husain
rumana husain
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 04:57 on October 6th, 2008

Rhonda J Mangus, I like this story. It's good stuff. interesting read.

0
Rhonda J Mangus

Hi Rumana! Thank you for commenting and for the Flag.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from