World

You take Rick, we’ll keep the presidency

by YankeeJim | March 10, 2012 at 12:46 pm

121 views | 2 Recommendations | 7 comments

Ethanol country

That’s my message to Kansas. Well, we learned nothing except that Kansas is conservative as ever.

What’s this about “fracking,” Rick? Earthquakes for everyone? Can’t drink the water? Don’t light a match?

He is backward on every issue and they call that conservatism. I call it ignorance.

By the way Rick, farmers want to hear the Ethanol story, not fracking.

“Rick Santorum Wins: Kansas Caucus Results 2012

Posted: 03/10/2012 3:23 pm Updated: 03/10/2012 3:54 pm

Rick Santorum was projected the winner of the 2012 Kansas Caucus on Saturday by the AP.

In the contest, 40 delegates were at stake. The results come less than one week afterten states held primaries or caucuses onSuper Tuesday.

With 75.6% of precincts reporting, Santorum had secured 53.4% of the vote over Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul.

While on the campaign trail in Kansas on Friday, Santorum took aim at rival Republican contender Romney and likened the former Massachusetts governor to President Barack Obama. He cast himself as the only choice for conservatives in the race for the White House.

Santorum said, "We already have one president who doesn't tell the truth to the American people. We don't need another." He added, "Gov. Romney reinvents himself for whatever the political occasion calls for."

The race for the Republican presidential nomination will now turn to the South ahead of the Alabama primary and Mississippi primary, which will take place on Tuesday. Voters in Hawaii will cast ballots in the state's caucus the same day.

This is a developing story... More information to come...”

0 See all footage | View Slideshow

Share: email story | add to any | | facebook | stumbleupon

recommend Sign In or Join to post comments

Lord_in_Black

at 13:04 on March 10th, 2012

lol the support for rick sanitarium santorum just means the peeps on the right dont really want the white house back this time cuz its a fixer upper and needs way to much maintainance lol condos and upscale gated communities look a much better bang for the buck lol man his beady eyes really cut me in 2 lol

"thirty-aught-six" (not verified)

at 14:25 on March 10th, 2012

Tea Party wants a House and Senate majority not the White House. That's why there is no Republican consensus. Most Republican understand that no President will be able to undo this mess while the public still sees nothing wrong. And liberals still believe their decisions have had no negative effects. Liberals have been emotionally invested in a populist leader for four years quietly giving the nod refusing to debate any and every policy. The Tea Party does not expect that come November that liberals will suddenly see the Constitution as a necessary instrument of individual Rights and Freedoms. Certainly not with their NDAA patrolling outside their homes and Gitmo an hour and a half flying time away. LOL.

YankeeJim

at 17:12 on March 10th, 2012

NDAA History

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005, from the Congressional Budget Office
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, from GovTrack.us
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, from GovTrack.us
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009, from GovTrack.us
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010: H.R. 2647 and S. 1391
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, from the Congressional Budget Office
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, from GovTracks.us

Are you siding with the American Civil Liberties Union on this?
"On December 31, 2011, President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), codifying indefinite military detention without charge or trial into law for the first time in American history. The NDAA’s dangerous detention provisions would authorize the president — and all future presidents — to order the military to pick up and indefinitely imprison people captured anywhere in the world, far from any battlefield."Via ACLU

'thirty-aught-six" (not verified)

at 18:18 on March 10th, 2012

I'd side with District 9 aliens if it would have the Obama administration step back from this BS brinkmanship's game they invoke at every level. and then hit the taxpayer to pick up the tab. That sh!t got old fast, man. And with these new improved powers we will never know until years later what harm has been done with secret wars and secret detentions and what all the f^ch people be doing in the name of national security. It isn't just Obama. Like I keep telling you. This shit breeds precedence and we don't need to become the secret war nation with secret renditions and secret trial and a population ignorant of what government is doing in our name and some BS national security thanks in good part to a Press that follows along like the good little Obama house pets they have become. It's like the only time the liberals and media are actually engaged in policy direction is when we have a Republican in the WH. So let's get another in soonest. Get folks back to looking at government with a critical eye instead of wetting themselves every time the Wash. Post prints the name OBAMA in all caps.

YankeeJim

at 04:07 on March 11th, 2012

Congress wrote and passed the legislation.

"thirty-aught-six" (not verified)

at 08:09 on March 11th, 2012

NOPE. The bill President Obama threatened to veto, the bill that was so controversial due to the language, is the bill and language the Obama White House itself pressured Congress to add to the bill, is the only reiteration of the bill Obama would sign, and this is all according to Sen. Carl Levin. Democrat. Armed Services, Intelligence, and Homeland Security Committees. We are constantly being gamed by Obama and this administration. Time to wake up.